I thought Evil Dead 2 took place in Michigan
1 Like
Extra stupid points for whichever campaign manager actually let this interview with CNN happen.
1 Like
I saw that shit earlier - I thought weād be past this by now ā¦ what a fuckinā non-issue at this point. This guyās just looking to get his name in the news as heās running for Senate, i believe
You know Trumpās people called this guy after he announced the run and went āJoeā¦ when you get a POTUS pardon youāre supposed to just fucking go awayā¦ā
1 Like
Well, I guess I wonāt be voting for Obama when he runs for president.
2 Likes
I feel like life has become an Onion article.
1 Like
Can you imagine Trump playing COD?
āI Shot you with my baby hands! I have great reflexes! The best!ā
1 Like
Heād probably swat his opponents.
Heād only play if it was his server and anyone with a better score or ratio would be kicked for being such obvious cheaters.
1 Like
100% chance heād use a lag switch.
3 Likes
100% chance he has Kushner play for him since he is also going to pacify the middle East.
Youāre all wrong. Trump camps with shotty/snipe. For sure.
He also has a turtle beach headset and calls everyone fag. Iād bet my bottom dollar on it.
2 Likes
Has anyone noticed the preponderance of political usernames in online gaming?
Donāt know how many times Iāve had to shoot some version of lyin_ted666, littlemarco, crookedhillary.
1 Like
Shooting them beats talking to them.
3 Likes
Not gonna lie, Iād definitely have a tag like āDonaldo Trumptasticoā if I still played. The best way to beat someone at a shooter is to throw them on tilt and wait for them to drown in salt.
But then, I have an amoral competitive streak.
2 Likes
My personal fav is throwing them out of helicopters a la Pinochet - but only after theyāve declared their allegiance to Marx and Communism ā¦ makes me warm insideā¦
oh,yāall are talking about vidyah games? ::backs out slowly::
2 Likes
I have a feeling CH4 will come to regret the existence of this interview.
Dollars to dimes heās never invited back.
EDIT: Itās a personal pet peeve when interviewers or debates say āWhat youāre basically sayingā¦ā It is among the most annoying attempts at re framing a conversation.
5 Likes
Youāre probably right - he wonāt be invited back BUT Iād be surprised if he didnāt convert a few viewers - or at least made them think.
And, even though I found her to be vapid and ignorant, I thought the woman interviewing him did a good job. She probably embodied her viewers perspective and engaged Peterson as they would have. I think she, in a way, gave the typical viewers (pardon my assumption here) an experience as if they were engaging with him.
He was poised and well spoken, spoke clearly and succinctly enough for her to kind of āget itā and at one point even reached her to where she was left speechless and thoughtful. I thought it spoke to how good of an interview it was.
To an extent. However, at times the probing was borderline hysteria. I feel like she lost control of herself here.
Had this been Marr or Neill (who are excellent) I feel like there would have been a more fruitful examination of his position.
Neil: Andrew Neil destroys Labour's Emily Thornberry - YouTube
Marr: Diane Abbott's hair-raising interview on Marr - YouTube
1 Like
Donāt get me wrong ā¦ I think she did a good job despite of herself. Really it was how Peterson responded to her attempts at putting words in his mouth and jumping to conclusions - non-the-less THATāS precisely how a lot of people think. They react using their type 1 thinking rather than slowing it down and considering EXACTLY the words being said and the context in which they are said.
Again, she was a perfect representative for her viewers and gave a great interview.
2 Likes