The Stupid Thread 2 (Part 1)

I didn’t give that much thought to the words, but I suppose it’s important to remember that Tipper Gore was a Democrat, a total bitch, and she deserved every bit of the smackdown she got from Frank Zappa.

Liberal should mean liberal again, in my opinion.

What does fossil fuel, illegal immigration, prostitution, universal healthcare, free education (I assume college since we have public schools already), Covid 19, have to do with racism against blacks? I’m not asking you specifically, just asking.

This “for all” crap sounds like communism and only people who don’t think they will have to have jobs (since everything is free) will believe it. You’ll pay for it with money or you’ll pay for it by labor, but you will pay for it one way or another.

The one thing I do agree with is decriminalizing drugs and prostitution (for the prostitutes, not the pimps and johns).

???

It never stopped being one.

Meh some of that I wouldn’t be opposed to, some of that I would be very much opposed to, and some of it I would need to know exactly what was meant by it. Unless something is a very detailed specific plan a lot of that I would be curious to know what some of it means. And some of it I have no idea what is but guessing it’s local stuff for you.

I’ll still say that we could use a massive overhaul of our criminal justice system. Question why we are the land of free but have more prisoners than any other country. I don’t think we should abolish police by any means but I’m not sure why it seems in some of these situations police have equipment that seems like it should belong to the military. Which we clearly can’t spend enough on either.

And yet the “mmm more police, more military” people get pissed off about funding education or healthcare. Different priorities than me I realize, but odd still. And odd in a time when some cheered the idea not long ago of people standing up against the jackbooted government thugs overreach during a pandemic are now cheering on those same jackbooted government thugs no matter what they do? Because this is apparently a protest they don’t like nearly as much?

Anyways just things that make me scratch my head right now.

Crazy. They don’t like burning and looting as much as they like businesses refusing to shut down, and dislike kids not being allowed on playgrounds. Let’s just call it what we know it to be: Racism.

If you disband the police then you wouldn’t need courts, at least criminal courts, since no one could be arrested and brought to trial. Basically, you wouldn’t have a criminal justice system so technically, you wouldn’t have criminals. I think they found the secret to eliminating crime.

1 Like

? The people who said we won’t follow the governments rules a few weeks ago are now cheering violence being used against people who aren’t following governments rules. They went from you can’t make me do what you want to they better lock these people up for not following curfew.

I’m not defending burning or looting at all. I’ll be honest I haven’t fully followed closely as I’ve been busy at work. Cops have only responded with aggression at people burning and looting solely? I would find that hard to believe with the amount of protests that have gone on.

It’s just a weird about face. Maybe more of a continued commentary about how people will oppose/support almost anything the government does to any level as long as they agree with it perhaps?

I don’t know you, but I hope you don’t waste time posting on even the political subsection of a bodybuilding site’s message board if you’re really either this ignorant or dense. The people that disagreed with government shutdowns a while back are the same people(for the most part) that disagree with burning and looting. They didn’t want to cripple the economy in response to a sickness, and they don’t want to destroy and steal property in response to a suspected killer…being charged with manslaughter and murder.

Ok. If that’s the ad hominem response you have then no point in discussing. Go troll someone else.

Do you know what ad hominem means?

That’s not it.

Even this:

isn’t.
You posted an absurd statement and got called on it. There is nothing strange about the people that opposed a forced economic shutdown a while back also supporting the use of government force to quell riots.

These people protested because they thought the government was using its power to do something they didn’t like. It wasn’t just about saving the economy like they were some crusaders. They refused to wear gloves or masks in a recruiting video as they said it would detract from the movement.

Again have the police only targeted people who were rioting? They haven’t done anything that could be seen as an infringement of the rights of peaceful protestors? Not at a single one of these? Not any instances? Has every single person protesting been rioting and looting the whole time? So me who hasn’t been following this closely in a two second google search can find police clubbing a guy on a bike (not looting or rioting that I can see) and shoving an old man to the ground (not looting or rioting that I can see) and it’s all fine. You’re staunchly anti-government but this is no big deal apparently?

Like I said I’m not for rioting or looting at all. Not defending that in the least bit. But the very people who were saying the government was going too far a few weeks ago are now all about the government reacting violently in a different situation of people saying the government has went too far. I’m also not for people walking into capital buildings armed to the teeth either.

An ad hominem is an argument or reaction directed at a person. If you don’t feel it fits that’s fine. I did. I’m just the nanny state guy who thought speed limits were ok. And you’re just the guy who spent weeks laughing and crying about people wearing masks during a pandemic.

He’s trolling you and/or not following events. Lots of non-lethal force has been used against peaceful protests across the country. Including clearing out peaceful protesters with gas and rubber bullets so trump could awkwardly fondle a Bible for a photo op intended to pander to the Bible belt.

1 Like

I really enjoyed reading this.

Violating property rights.

Not sure what recruiting video it was, but is there not conflicting information on gloves and masks even if you believe anything beneficial should be mandatory?

No clue.

No clue. Some people believe the very existence of private property is an infringement of rights.

Ehh…I don’t think so.

I haven’t seen this. Can you post it? Are you talking about the NYC Officers tackling the asshole? Why is the only black guy in the BLM protest in uniform and keeping a white girl away from his coworkers?

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

But far more anti-leftist.

Right. I believe you.

I’m not sure why this is so surprising. You even said, “different situation.”

And I still think it’s unnecessary, if you’re healthy. If you’re not healthy, wearing a mask isn’t going to change that. If you have heart disease and lung cancer, have already given up smoking, and normally wear a mask, I certainly don’t think it’s silly to wear one.

Try google. Like I said I haven’t even been following it closely as I’ve been swamped at work and it took me a few seconds to prove it.

Try google.

Easily verifiable by using the internet to check. For someone with a strong opinion on this you sure seem like you haven’t even bothered to look for information. Or (far more likely) you know some of the information but the troll game needs to be on point.

There you go. Protest and get your ass kicked is never a big deal as long as you’re a lefty.

Oh that’s undeniable. Apologies and cheering on big government if it’s something the right is doing has now turned into your trademark. Much like many on the right as long as the President or members of the government are doing something that goes against “leftists” who really gives a shit?

Now now, H, don’t take China’s prison figures at face value. Your incarceration rate is high, for sure, but so are your crime levels.

I’d say a fair few comparitor nations (The U.K. very much included) could afford to send a lot more to the clink than they currently do.

I wouldn’t be so sure. It didn’t take long to go from same-sex marriage to pedophile drag queens reading stories to children in libraries.

They have to know that human trafficking would only increase if prostitution were made legal. They are literally advocating for the creation of more sex slaves.

1 Like

Can someone tell me what a “black femme” is, and why facial recognition technology is so uniquely dangerous to them?

Could be, I’m not well-informed on that. The one I.C.E. agent I know personally works human trafficking cases with Interpol. It is a seedy world of the worst people on the planet who will exploit any opening they can, so you’re probably right.

I pictured Ru Paul, but I’m probably way-off.