I’d say that’s probably true for most tattoos, regardless of what language they are in. I suppose some guys like it when a gal takes her shirt off and there’s a fucking cobra surrounded by roses framing the underside of her boobs, but I’m not one of those guys. Nor do I want to look at your ex-boyfriend’s name during intimate moments, especially if he’s in prison right now.
To each their own. If I were to get a tattoo, I suppose “Portable BBQ Grill” in Japanese would be fairly high on the list. It should mean something special to you, after all.
I’m just talking about tattoos being wrong in general. At least for my tastes. But yes, improper translations fall into their own special category of bad tattoos.
Not that I’m anti-tattoo completely. It’s just that there are so many bad ones in general. I can appreciate a well-done and well-placed piece of body art. I suppose all of the ladies with gumball machines on their necks, a .44 magnum on their thigh or swear words tattooed on their knuckles are doing me a favor.
A friend of mine is an Everton Football Club supporter, they are called Evertonians. One of their lot, a chap called Onion, who is particularly thick, got a tattoo across his stomach in large letters saying Evertonion hence his nickname forevermore.
It’s not only for tattoos in Asian languages. When hyphen Americans hear that I’m from their alleged Old Country they start rolling up their sleeves unprompted ans showing me their tattoos that are supposed to “celebrate their heritage”.
My answer is always one of the following:
I have no idea what that means.Are you sure you didn’t mix up the countries? All special letters are tattooed backwards. Grammar is completely fucked up. Did you use Google translate? That’s extremely racist
That was more of a (forgive the term) “split the baby” type of compromise I thought reasonable Democrats would agree to. Then the very next week the Virginia governor made his remarks and a Virginia legislator proposed a bill that would allow abortion “after dilation”.
So, the hell with it I guess. What’s a few million more dead babies? We’ll just import our unwanted children like everything else.
“So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen, the infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if this is what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physician and the mother.”
Did you notice the “kept comfortable” part where they’re deciding on whether or not to keep the baby human alive or not? This is straight up infanticide and eugenics and is not the same as someone with a DNR or who has been medically proven unable to survive without medical machinery.
I think you all need to get your facts from places other than Twitter and Ben Shapiro’s hack site.
You can already get a third trimester abortion in VA. The bill does not allow for infanticide as has been claimed. But this is the age of outrage so what do facts matter?
What is funny, or stupid, is all of the republican politicians who were bringing up the Bible in their bursts of outrage. I wonder if they skipped all of the parts where God killed children and pregnant mothers or had them killed.
