Well, screening for STIs is the biggest service at PP, but No. That 3-4% number is misleading for a number of reasons. Slate, WPo and NPR have done stories about this, and have talked about why that number is misleading. The percentage of clients getting an abortion is closer to 14%.
From the National Review, so right leaning article, but this is how they get that number.
Take an example. A woman walks into a Planned Parenthood clinic. She takes a pregnancy test, meets with a counselor, and chooses to have an abortion procedure. While sheās there, she also receives an STI test and a breast exam and is handed birth control on her way out the door. Planned Parenthood would count each of these ādiscrete interactionsā ā six in total ā as a service, so abortion would be only 16 percent of that womanās visit.
From NPR. This article also shows the way PP underestimates abortion with the deceptive 3% number.
Well, I think STI screening and Contraception are the top two services, but the way they keep track of numbers makes some of this pretty hard to parse out. Also, in terms of Govt agencies, we have county health departments that also perform STI screening and prescribe birth control.
Assuming the govt has the capacity to pick up all the non abortion slack, I personally wouldnāt be opposed to dissolving PP and forcing people to go a different route for their abortions. Obviously thatās not the case, but still.
Iād bet when single payer finally rolls out weāll see PP go the way of the dodo
Well the other option would be to reign in the HC industryās runaway rising costs vs inflation, but given their power in Washington single payer is probably more likely