[quote]rainjack wrote:
I like the way you call out someone for ‘racist remarks’ if he is on the right, but you defend the same type of name-calling and racist blather when it is directed at southern whites.
Your hypocrisy is smelling up the political forums.
[/quote]
List one quote where I defended name-calling of southern whites? I don’t understand you sometimes.
Are you on the clen already,
Fahd
[quote]rainjack wrote:
fahd wrote:
Nice try though. It really shows your intelligence and maturity to resort to associating particullar people with certain racist ideas.
I like the way you call out someone for ‘racist remarks’ if he is on the right, but you defend the same type of name-calling and racist blather when it is directed at southern whites.
Your hypocrisy is smelling up the political forums.
[/quote]
-Here we go again!
Are you going to keep bringing this topic to each thread until somebody agrees with you?
I guess the french will pick up any anti-American rhetoric they can and publish it. You would figure with the way they are falling apart at the seems right now it doesn’t matter what they publish.
[quote]fahd wrote:
sjoconn wrote:
So to summerize this thread: you post s BS story which people then say is BS. So then you come back with something that reads something like “you guys are neocon stupid heads and I hate America”. Now thats good discussion there. Wow.
Try understand it in the context the that Thebigdogbarks racist remarks.
Thebigdogbarks first started insulting all Arabs (not that I am one) by calling them “goat molesters and ragheads”.
The article is not and cannot be 100% true, it is, however, a general and true reflection of what many people in western Europe think about the war and people like thebigdogbarks only reinforcing the R*dneck (rainjack made it a dirty word)Stereotype.
I apologise for the unnecessary donut-eating remark; I personally have NOTHING against American people, I did it on purpose to demonstrate some people’s hypocracy: they act as if you can call an entire gourp of human being ragheads and goldmolesters just for being born in the middle east, while its not ok to joke about Americans.
You’re always right and I’m always wrong,
Fahd
[/quote]
If you would have made a reasonable semi well thought out statement such as this you would have appeared less petty and better educated. It would have been more of a discussion.
It seems that name calling is kind of the norm in the political forum, which is why I seldom come down here unless its military related. After the name calling starts I really dont care how well thought out a comment is…it seems to loose all credibility.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
fahd wrote:
Nice try though. It really shows your intelligence and maturity to resort to associating particullar people with certain racist ideas.
I like the way you call out someone for ‘racist remarks’ if he is on the right, but you defend the same type of name-calling and racist blather when it is directed at southern whites.
Your hypocrisy is smelling up the political forums.
[/quote]
calling an arab a rag- head and someone else a redneck is not the same thing, rainjack…fucking give it up…please!! no ones buying it.
[quote]sjoconn wrote:
fahd wrote:
sjoconn wrote:
So to summerize this thread: you post s BS story which people then say is BS. So then you come back with something that reads something like “you guys are neocon stupid heads and I hate America”. Now thats good discussion there. Wow.
Try understand it in the context the that Thebigdogbarks racist remarks.
Thebigdogbarks first started insulting all Arabs (not that I am one) by calling them “goat molesters and ragheads”.
The article is not and cannot be 100% true, it is, however, a general and true reflection of what many people in western Europe think about the war and people like thebigdogbarks only reinforcing the R*dneck (rainjack made it a dirty word)Stereotype.
I apologise for the unnecessary donut-eating remark; I personally have NOTHING against American people, I did it on purpose to demonstrate some people’s hypocracy: they act as if you can call an entire gourp of human being ragheads and goldmolesters just for being born in the middle east, while its not ok to joke about Americans.
You’re always right and I’m always wrong,
Fahd
If you would have made a reasonable semi well thought out statement such as this you would have appeared less petty and better educated. It would have been more of a discussion.
It seems that name calling is kind of the norm in the political forum, which is why I seldom come down here unless its military related. After the name calling starts I really dont care how well thought out a comment is…it seems to loose all credibility.
[/quote]
I believe he was replying to someone else who started it, calling him a rag-head…
[quote]AZMojo wrote:
Are you going to keep bringing this topic to each thread until somebody agrees with you?
[/quote]
No - just until you are exposed for the racist piece of shit you are.
[quote]mmg_4 wrote:
calling an arab a rag- head and someone else a redneck is not the same thing, rainjack…fucking give it up…please!! no ones buying it.[/quote]
Says who? You and your merry band of liberals?
It is the same thing. Racism is racism - bigotry is bigotry. If you don’t like what I write - you have every right to go the fuck somewhere else.
I have been here a shitload longer than you have - and I will be here after you have quit lifting, gotten morbidly fat, and quit posting on here. I really don’t need a newb like you to tell me anything. I have more than proven your position to be that of a bigoted racist - yet you tell me to give it up. I think you took too many fastballs in the temple area back when you were a ‘pro’.
[quote]fahd wrote:
The article is not and cannot be 100% true, it is, however, a general and true reflection of what many people in western Europe think about the war
[/quote]
This doesn’t make sense. You post something that has been thoroughly exposed as BS, and then tell us that Western Europe believes it. What’s the point? Maybe that folks in Western Europe need to be a little more selective about what they choose to believe?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
AZMojo wrote:
Are you going to keep bringing this topic to each thread until somebody agrees with you?
No - just until you are exposed for the racist piece of shit you are.
[/quote]
I know you are, but what am I? So you’ve finally resorted to name calling. The end is near.
How can one white person be racist against another? A geographist maybe, but not a racist?
You’re done. No one is buying your arguments, and it’s making you crazy. Each post becomes more and more irrational.
Everybody watch as Rainjack self-destructs.
fahd has posted numerous anti-American posts that he has either plagerized as his own (the anti-US university story) or has not investigated to verify accuracy (the Jimmy Massey fabrication). I suspect that he leans far in the direction of being anti-American and believes any anti-American propoganda he hears which only reinforces his hatred of the US.
On several posts, he has stated that some of his posts are just done in jest. How does he know my raghead comment was not in jest? It appears that he can play a “joke”, but he cannot take one. As an aside, I’m not to fond of donuts, but a thick ribeye steak (medium rare) often hits the spot!
Also, fahd demonstates either his prejudice or his ignorance in his statement inferring that all people from Middle Eastern countries are, in his words, “Arabs”. With his stated background, this is surprising. A Welshman may not want to be called a Brit and most “Oriental” people are quite offended if you confuse a Korean for a Japanese, etc. Perhaps to FAHD they’re “all they same”.
Fahd seems to be able to dish it out, but cannot tkae it. Furthermore, he berates others that argue about his posts, calling people who argue on the internet “retarded”, and then he argues back becoming angrily involved in the arguements himself. Fahd, was that your own special olympics picture that you posted on the forum? (I noticed the family with the goat in the background…don’t look, I’m just kidding.)
On a serious note, if you’re going to repost a story from another site, at least give credit where it is due so that you don’t continue to lose all credibility. Also, verify some of the stories that you repost (ie Jimmy Massey). Your knee-jerk anti-American reponses only serve to undermine your credibility and reinforce my belief that you are one of those smegheads (hopefully I don’t need to translate this one for you) who continue to pollute the internet with urban legends. (ROFLMAO)
[quote]thebigdogbarks wrote:
fahd has posted numerous anti-American posts that he has either plagerized as his own (the anti-US university story) or has not investigated to verify accuracy (the Jimmy Massey fabrication). I suspect that he leans far in the direction of being anti-American and believes any anti-American propoganda he hears which only reinforces his hatred of the US.
On several posts, he has stated that some of his posts are just done in jest. How does he know my raghead comment was not in jest? It appears that he can play a “joke”, but he cannot take one. As an aside, I’m not to fond of donuts, but a thick ribeye steak (medium rare) often hits the spot!
Also, fahd demonstates either his prejudice or his ignorance in his statement inferring that all people from Middle Eastern countries are, in his words, “Arabs”. With his stated background, this is surprising. A Welshman may not want to be called a Brit and most “Oriental” people are quite offended if you confuse a Korean for a Japanese, etc. Perhaps to FAHD they’re “all they same”.
Fahd seems to be able to dish it out, but cannot tkae it. Furthermore, he berates others that argue about his posts, calling people who argue on the internet “retarded”, and then he argues back becoming angrily involved in the arguements himself. Fahd, was that your own special olympics picture that you posted on the forum? (I noticed the family with the goat in the background…don’t look, I’m just kidding.)
On a serious note, if you’re going to repost a story from another site, at least give credit where it is due so that you don’t continue to lose all credibility. Also, verify some of the stories that you repost (ie Jimmy Massey). Your knee-jerk anti-American reponses only serve to undermine your credibility and reinforce my belief that you are one of those smegheads (hopefully I don’t need to translate this one for you) who continue to pollute the internet with urban legends. (ROFLMAO) [/quote]
Lol. keep ‘em comin’.
thebigdogbarks wrote:
Everyone needs to realize that FAHD has an agenda. He is blatantly anti-American and has, on multiple occassions, either fabricated, plagerized or passed on “stories” simply because they had an anit-American message. Form his location and his spelling of various words, he was obviously not raised in the US and possible has never visited the US. From his posts, I suspect he is an Islamic extremist and apparently suffers from a severe form of microcephaly and quite likely craniorectal inversion.
PS - fahd, I wasn’t trying to insult “all Arabs”…just you!
Paid a malu cachu.
[quote]thebigdogbarks wrote:
fahd has posted numerous anti-American posts that he has either plagerized as his own (the anti-US university story)
[/quote]
LOL! He still think it was anti-university.
The funniest thing is that I’m not even Arab.
I’ve stated NUMEROUS times that I’m Asian and live in wales. So this is absolutely the worst example you can give. Again, it shows how illiterate you are.
Good joke, but I’m not Arab.
I stated “interesting article” which means its not mine. Or is that to subtle for you?
You are too easily amused by your own jokes.
[No doubt, but the last numbers I have seen (from the UN?) showed the terrorists were responsibly for most of the civilian deaths in Iraq.
Also the US does not target civilians. The terrorists certainly do.
Zap,
Given the administration’s stated goal of turning Iraq into a terrorist “flytrap”, and “fighting them over there instead of over here”, don’t we bear much of the blame for the civilian deaths? If our goal was to attract as many terrorists as possible to Iraq, then we endeavored to create a situation where Iraqi civilians would inevitably die…the rationale, based in no coherent logic, presupposes “better their women and children than ours”.
[quote]dermo wrote:
…the rationale, based in no coherent logic, presupposes “better their women and children than ours”.
[/quote]
Do you disagree with that?
Better ANYONE’s women and children than ours.
fart, faht, fahd, whatever:
Please stop posting lies. If my country is so awful, you should be able to get something which is actually true to incriminate us with. Lord knows our very own media tries every damn day to do so.
Until then, kiss my and every other US patriot’s ass.
Fahd : your a tool . How old are you? are you married? Got any good friends? Look around you , if this abrasive attitude is you all the time , apparantly your just projecting your anger of yourself @ amerikkka
[quote]thabigdon24 wrote:
How old are you? are you married?
[/quote]
Asking a guy whether he’s married is quite gay. But yeah I do have a gf, sorry to disapppoint you.
No we can’t just be friends either.
[quote]
your just projecting your anger of yourself @ amerikkka[/quote]
I am perfectly happy with myself. I am happy enough that I don’t need to project my sexual frustration on the Internet by resurrecting dead threads just to start arguements.
Typical of the liberal media. Print and spread the news before checking credibility. It’s been uncovered that Massey is a liar. He has admitted to being told to say these things (probably paid).
As Mary Mapes, formerly of ABC news and the phony “Bill Burkett Bush National Guard documents,” has been saying lately – it’s not a journalists job to prove their stories are true, it’s others responsibility to prove the stories are not true. I think that is a common warped logic throughout the current major media.