Any thoughts on this? I read in The Times yesterday that partying like this is considered routine ‘after’ the President leaves but apparently the prostitutes saw the room Obama was staying in.
The ethical and professional questions of wild partying and hookers the night before you are responsible for the presidents safety aside, the biggest part of the misconduct is having hookers in rooms and exposed to classified information, like the president’s schedule.
Seems like something Sterling Archer would do…
Fish rot from the head.
Haggling over 45$ with a callgirl is not only cheap but also incredibly stupid if you stand out already and have a job to do.
If you’re ready to take a bullet for me, I’d be ok with you snorting coke off a Columbian hooker’s ass.
Think its a bit cheap to argue price though.
A lot of these people are sent to sites ahead of time and don’t even deal with the president directly, they are literally off to the next city before the president arrives. Many are also very young, possibly their first job after leaving 4 years of the military.
Edit: Could be different in every situation especially another country, but a majority of these lower level secret service don’t even stay at the same hotel the president does.
[quote]orion wrote:
Haggling over 45$ with a callgirl is not only cheap but also incredibly stupid if you stand out already and have a job to do.[/quote]
Yes very stupid, I wouldn’t be surprised if the girl made it up to get more money and that kind of thing happens all the time.
Apparently the girl was an escort who was promised $800 and then was offered $45 the day after.
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Apparently the girl was an escort who was promised $800 and then was offered $45 the day after.
[/quote]
Yeah…if you’re going to ask for a tune you have to pay the piper.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
Haggling over 45$ with a callgirl is not only cheap but also incredibly stupid if you stand out already and have a job to do.[/quote]
Yes very stupid, I wouldn’t be surprised if the girl made it up to get more money and that kind of thing happens all the time.[/quote]
I would.
You usually do not get that shit with 800$ a night callgirls.
Very bad for her reputation.
Don’t CIA learn about “the honey trap” in their training? Amateurs.
[quote]orion wrote:
Haggling over 45$ with a callgirl is not only cheap but also incredibly stupid if you stand out already and have a job to do.[/quote]
…and one is very comfortable with the whole exchange if they are willing to haggle after the fact.
Damn, those call girls got “stiffed”
BADUM TISH!! Thank you…thank you…I’ll be here all week. Tip your servers.
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Apparently the girl was an escort who was promised $800 and then was offered $45 the day after.
[/quote]
Nah, the girl wanted $800, and the client said $30 and a fight pursued, the guy finally paid $200. So I heard.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Don’t CIA learn about “the honey trap” in their training? Amateurs.[/quote]
'The Colombian prostitutes entangled in the Secret Service sex scandal could have been Russian spies, Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested Tuesday.
“We’re looking at something that is very, very serious when national security might not be protected properly,” Grassley told Radio Iowa. “Who knows who might be using prostitutes? The Russians are famous for that to get information out of us.”
“The issue here isn’t just people messing around with prostitutes, the issue is the security of the president of the United States and the issue is any national security implications that it might have because of the secrecy and the documents and things of that nature,” Grassley said.’
This is one case where the U.S. Secret Service could apparently stand to learn a thing or two from the British Secret Service.
Can you imagine Bond having to actually pay a woman to have sex with him, much less haggle with her over the price?
Secret Service ‘lax management culture – directly endangering life of president’…
“So far, the biggest scandal in the history of the Secret Service involves agents hiring prostitutes in Colombia . But the media have largely ignored a much bigger scandal at the agency: a lax management culture that condones cutting corners, directly endangering the life of the president…”
I’d say someone should go away for about 7 months and look into this problem. In 7 months, if they haven’t found a solution they should go away for another four years and try to figure it out again. These things take time.