The Real Weiner

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dk44 wrote:

[quote]Grneyes wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]

If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]

I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service[/quote]

Try not to act like a ass. If you were paying him to do a job that did not entail advertising his penis…[/quote]

So it’s not okay even in his leisure time to show off his wang?

What The Fuck use is technology if we can’t show off our boners to the ladies we wanna bone with it?[/quote]

He did it with a gov’t owned cell phone over gov’t paid for band width. If that’s not justification for being fired then I don’t know what is. [/quote]

Actually, he’s stated that he used his personal computer and personal Blackberry. He does not recall using any gov’t resources.[/quote]

Are you crazy? He was also “hacked” and he also couldn’t recall if it was him in those pics. Why do you believe him? He lied for a good week, but now he is telling the truth.[/quote]

I am curious , when was the last time you flogged the dog ,spanked the monkey, chocked the chicken,squeezed the weezel , would you be real quick to tell America , And do you think you have the right to know these things from your elected officials ? Would you want some one in office that would answer those questions too fast ? That may take some type of perversion in it’s self .
[/quote]

Do I have a vote in the House of Representatives Pitt?

Did constituents elect me to represent their best interest?

As a politician, your are expected to be better. You are supposed to NOT be a dirtbag prick, and this guy is 1st team All-American at that. It’s not just that he lied, but he was a total dick about it. He yells and screams (like a bitch), called a reporter a jackass when pushed about it, talked about someone throwing a pie from the crowd…I mean come on dude. The guy is a disgrace. Had he just denied it and left it at that, it probably would not seem as bad. But when he is rudely dismissive and abrasive, it’s time for him to go.

The Dems will blackball him, ignore his calls, and basically turn him into the black sheep of Congress. You have Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (head of the DNC chair) calling for his resignation, along with Pelosi too.


I present you, Anthony Weiner, House Representative of New York…holding his cock in a towel.

Watcha think Pitt, should we start a political SAMA thread ?

My name is Anthony bitch !

Max! Those are just progress pix! :wink:

Seriously, this just gets more tawdry by the day…

[quote]Grneyes wrote:
It’s interesting, to me at least, that most people are saying what he did wasn’t that bad. I’m sure if he had actually had sex or committed some kind of sex act with another woman, it would be totally different. People are drawing the line between real life and the technological world. Does that make sense? The thinking is that as long as he didn’t ACTUALLY have sex with another woman, whatever he did is okay. He’s not as bad as Clinton or John Edwards or Arnold. [/quote]

In my mind there is no difference. Cheating emotionally on your wife does the same damage. Would you be ok if your own woman was doing this with other guys? Would it be understood by you as “Technology”?

Would she be fit for office? Would someone who betrays their own wife hold any allegiance to you as a constituent? I think not.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
My name is Anthony bitch ![/quote]

C’mon dude, all he meant to do was send this to T-Nation’s 'Rate My Physique", but it accidentally went out on twitter.

Maximus…maybe we should start a thread in RMP for Mr. Wiener???

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]Grneyes wrote:
It’s interesting, to me at least, that most people are saying what he did wasn’t that bad. I’m sure if he had actually had sex or committed some kind of sex act with another woman, it would be totally different. People are drawing the line between real life and the technological world. Does that make sense? The thinking is that as long as he didn’t ACTUALLY have sex with another woman, whatever he did is okay. He’s not as bad as Clinton or John Edwards or Arnold. [/quote]

In my mind there is no difference. Cheating emotionally on your wife does the same damage. Would you be ok if your own woman was doing this with other guys? Would it be understood by you as “Technology”?

Would she be fit for office? Would someone who betrays their own wife hold any allegiance to you as a constituent? I think not.
[/quote]

This is for the voters to decide. It certainly isn’t for other politicians to judge and then use their judgements in calls for resignation.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]Grneyes wrote:
It’s interesting, to me at least, that most people are saying what he did wasn’t that bad. I’m sure if he had actually had sex or committed some kind of sex act with another woman, it would be totally different. People are drawing the line between real life and the technological world. Does that make sense? The thinking is that as long as he didn’t ACTUALLY have sex with another woman, whatever he did is okay. He’s not as bad as Clinton or John Edwards or Arnold. [/quote]

In my mind there is no difference. Cheating emotionally on your wife does the same damage. Would you be ok if your own woman was doing this with other guys? Would it be understood by you as “Technology”?

Would she be fit for office? Would someone who betrays their own wife hold any allegiance to you as a constituent? I think not.
[/quote]

I happen to agree with you. It’s just interesting to me that people are drawing a line and creating levels of cheating. It’s almost like they’re condoning what he did because he didn’t commit the ultimate act of cheating by actually sleeping with another woman. Cheating is cheating, no matter if it’s what he did or what Arnold did or what Clinton did.

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dk44 wrote:

[quote]Grneyes wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]reddog6376 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Americans think it is their right to get involved with all aspects of some one’s life , He was GUILTY of flirting with consenting adults , shame on him , this is redickulust :)[/quote]

If an employee of yours took pictures of his Johnson on a company paid for cell phone, then sent said pictures using company bandwidth, all while on the company clock, you’d be ok with all that?[/quote]

I guess it depends on what my business is , is it a Bible Book store or a Male Escort Service[/quote]

Try not to act like a ass. If you were paying him to do a job that did not entail advertising his penis…[/quote]

So it’s not okay even in his leisure time to show off his wang?

What The Fuck use is technology if we can’t show off our boners to the ladies we wanna bone with it?[/quote]

He did it with a gov’t owned cell phone over gov’t paid for band width. If that’s not justification for being fired then I don’t know what is. [/quote]

Actually, he’s stated that he used his personal computer and personal Blackberry. He does not recall using any gov’t resources.[/quote]

Are you crazy? He was also “hacked” and he also couldn’t recall if it was him in those pics. Why do you believe him? He lied for a good week, but now he is telling the truth.[/quote]

I am curious , when was the last time you flogged the dog ,spanked the monkey, chocked the chicken,squeezed the weezel , would you be real quick to tell America , And do you think you have the right to know these things from your elected officials ? Would you want some one in office that would answer those questions too fast ? That may take some type of perversion in it’s self .
[/quote]

Jane, you ignorant slut. He was doing it on company time.


Max either didn’t notice or just didn’t post the good one though. If these TMZ shots are legit than maybe they are progress pics and damn did he come a long way. Somehow I have my doubts of their authenticity after seeing this one.

[quote]EndersDrift2 wrote:
Max either didn’t notice or just didn’t post the good one though. If these TMZ shots are legit than maybe they are progress pics and damn did he come a long way. Somehow I have my doubts of their authenticity after seeing this one.[/quote]

Dude, TMZ are everywhere in major cities, hell you should see them hiding at LAX airport !

If this man wants to send dick pics, why not sent them to his new wife? Can someone explain that one to me ? If he has some fetish with this shit, why not share it with the woman whom he claims to love, and not with the public ?

I swear, my eyes are bleeding looking at this man that resembles a walking penis if there ever was one.

If he were a Republican he’d be gone already.

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

I am curious , when was the last time you flogged the dog ,spanked the monkey, chocked the chicken,squeezed the weezel , would you be real quick to tell America , And do you think you have the right to know these things from your elected officials ? Would you want some one in office that would answer those questions too fast ? That may take some type of perversion in it’s self .
[/quote]

Exactly. Weiner is guilty of stupidly bringing his personal and public lives to an intersection for a moment in time. And he is guilty of ONLY that. The rest has nothing to do with any of you, at least until it can be explicitly and beyond any doubt verified that laws were in fact broken.

Weiner should have done exactly what Clinton should have done: “I apologize for bringing a meaningless distraction to the national consciousness. I apologize for my momentary and relatively harmless lapse in judgement [posting the photo, not the sexting itself]. And beyond that, it’s none of your fucking business.”[/quote]

He was incredibly stupid, that is exactly what he should have done

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
If he were a Republican he’d be gone already.[/quote]

If he were Republican it would have involved a Men’s Restroom :slight_smile:

It looks like Obama is using PC speech to get Weiner to resign…

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
If he were a Republican he’d be gone already.[/quote]If he were Republican it would have involved a Men’s Restroom :)[/quote]And he would have been gone already.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
If he were a Republican he’d be gone already.[/quote]If he were Republican it would have involved a Men’s Restroom :)[/quote]And he would have been gone already.
[/quote]

you mean like Newt ?

Huma returns tomorrow, he will resign within a few days, guaranteed.

After being called out by Obama and Pelosi, he better. If he doesn’t, they will blackball him, and be the albatross of the 2012 elections.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Huma returns tomorrow, he will resign within a few days, guaranteed.

After being called out by Obama and Pelosi, he better. If he doesn’t, they will blackball him, and be the albatross of the 2012 elections. [/quote]

“2012 Dems…The party of Weiner”!

What an absolutely pompous asshole. Calling people “jackass” and talking about “a pie being thrown from the crowd”, how fucking stoopid can you look ?