[quote]randman wrote:
You think blacks are so violent, huh? Well I’ve got another hypothesis for your small-minded brain to chew on. I’ll come up with more statistics than you’ve offered thus far for your weak hypothesis.
What do you think of that one my white supremacist friend?
So your simplistic view of color = more prone to violence doesn’t hold water. Actually, it just further proves your bigoted view on the world. [/quote]
RANDMAN . . . what are you, a Freshman taking Sociology 101? Are you incapable of debate without insult? I should ignore your post since your patter is getting old, but you’ve obviously been busy and you’ve constructed one of the few counter-arguments that actually has some thought in it. I think I owe you the respect of an answer.
First off, I’m tyrying hard to ignore “cause.” I don’t know why black communities are more violent. I know black people, as individuals, aren’t any more violent than whites. I think it probably has something to do with culture . . . but that’s another thread.
Second, a list of white atrocities proves nothing. In fact, the real white racists and supremacists out there, actually use the statistics you cited to prove how bad things are today. Their argument is that those things you mention (while bad) don?t compare to what blacks regularly do to whites. (I’ll get to that, shortly.)
The problem with your list (as an example) is that you have to compare the lynchings in 1903 with the black on white crime in 1903.
Afterall, that is what we’re talking about . . . are black communities more violent than white communities?
So, let’s compare BLACK-ON-WHITE crime with WHITE-ON-BLACK crime. I’ll use FBI statistics for 2003. (I don’t have 2004; they’re not complete yet.)
Let’s start with the fact that blacks make up only 13% of the population (38 million).
MURDERS: Of 7024 murders in 2003, blacks committed 3412 of them . . . 49%
Let me repeat: 13% of the population did 49% of the murders.
3147 blacks were murdered . . . 226 by whites . . . 7%
3600 whites were murdered . . . 501 by blacks . . . 14%
Not only do blacks kill whites at twice the rate white kill blacks . . . but blacks die violent deaths in unbelievable rates. A population that makes up 13% commits 49% of the murders and suffers 45% of the deaths!
Now lets compare urban areas. I first selected nine urban areas that I think are predominantly white. I may be wrong on some Here are their population and the number of murders in 2003. Remember the New Orleans population is 1,500,000.
MINNEAPOLIS - ST PAUL pop 3,000,000 88 murders (twice the size of NO)
MILWAUKEE pop 1,500,000 119 murders
MADISON, WI pop 522,000 16 murders (1/3 size of NO so adjusted murders = 48)
FT LAUDERDALE pop 1,740,000 67 murders
SANTA ANNA-ANAHEIM-IRVINE pop 2,900,000 (twice the size of NO) 64 murders
LAS VEGAS (sin city) 1,500,000 172 murders
LANCASTER, PA pop 500,000 10 murders (adjusted for pop would be 30 murders)
HONOLULU pop 900,000 15 murders (adjusted for pop would be 22 murders)
HARRISBURG, PA pop 515,000 14 murders (adjusted 52)
Now . . . New Orleans . . . predominantly black while all the above were predominantly white . . . 1,300,000 pop
334 murders
If you think NO is unique . . . go to 2003 FBI crime stats at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm
Make a list of cities with large black populations and look up their murder rates. See if you spot a trend.
Finally . . . the Hispanic population in the US is around the same as the black population. See any riots in San Antonio or Houston lately?
My point . . . once again . . . what we’re seeing in NO can be explained by the fact that black communities are much more violent than white communities.
I don’t claim to know the cause . . . and I don’t claim that blacks as individuals are any more violent . . . but my conclusion is irrefutable.