The Philosophy of Liberty

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]NickViar wrote:

This is why socialist and communist utopias are ridiculous. [/quote]

Thank you… I was called a whole bunch of names for saying this same thing, and then dragged into a pointless semantics argument for saying the same thing. [/quote]

Don’t be sophomoric.

just kidding zecarlo…
[/quote]

I was thinking along the lines of being called a sociopath for pointing out when one word is used to define another… ah fuck it, who cares.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]NickViar wrote:

This is why socialist and communist utopias are ridiculous. [/quote]

Thank you… I was called a whole bunch of names for saying this same thing, and then dragged into a pointless semantics argument for saying the same thing. [/quote]

Don’t be sophomoric.

just kidding zecarlo…
[/quote]

I was thinking along the lines of being called a sociopath for pointing out when one word is used to define another… ah fuck it, who cares. [/quote]

Well, at least to my knowledge, no one has claimed you conspire with the Devil. And yes, that’s happened to me…

  1. There would be no currency.
  2. There would be no private competition if workers organised and refused to work for a wage.
  3. there would be no businesses afterwards, just organised people running workplaces, designing new commodities.

This has been done for near the entirety of the spanish civil war in catalonia, farmers farmed, harvested, waiters went to work, mechanics did etc. Productivity went through the roof. We know this can work, I am not saying it is the only economic system that can work.

Yes the working class took control of the means of production, the capitalist became workers in those areas. Do any of you know of anarchy-communism, if not I won’t waste evryones time, I just thought it would make an interesting debate.

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:

  1. There would be no currency.
  2. There would be no private competition if workers organised and refused to work for a wage.
  3. there would be no businesses afterwards, just organised people running workplaces, designing new commodities.
    [/quote]

What incentive will there be to work?
What incentive will there be to innovate?
What will you do with those that don’t work?
How do you purpose people will react when a doctor works 8 hours performing surgery and a HS dropout works 8 hours digging ditches for the same things?
Who chooses what everyone “gets” for their effort?
How do you “pay” to get your car fixed to go to your workplace if there is no currency?
How do you organize anything if there is no organization/leadership structure?
What do you do with retirees?
What do you do with children?
What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
What about fun activites like gyms, do they still exist? For what purpose?

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

What incentive was there to work in catalonia during the anarchist phase? there is incentive to work so you can eat, get new clothes, have nice dinners at the communal restaurants, so they could have education and go to the pub and have sports events etc etc.

There is far more incentive for the workers to work and work harder if they control what gets produced, they get what is produced etc.

Workers make everything in society, every single thing. We would have iPods and big ass TV’s, we just wouldn’t have a capitalist extracting surplus value off the workers who make it.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

There has and always will be someone in power.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

But you haven’t addressed the massive anarchist economy in a big part of spain during the spanish civil war that worked, it flourished. Some families had lots of kids, some had no kids. I don’t get your point.

More than enough is produced globally to feed, house and supply all needs, but food is dumped in the millions of tonnes to drive up food and stop overproduction, the insanity of the capitalist system actually destroys millions of tonnes of food so that it can keep prices artificially high.

If anything, believing that capitalism can work is far more utopian because you believe manipulatable markets can lead to liberty.

The fact is it is in the workers interests to take control of the means of production nd it is in the interests of the capitalist to keep the means of production private and use wage slavery to create surplus value.

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:
What incentive was there to work in catalonia during the anarchist phase? there is incentive to work so you can eat, get new clothes, have nice dinners at the communal restaurants, so they could have education and go to the pub and have sports events etc etc.
[/quote]
I don’t know anything about Catalonia. Do they produce anything other than essentials to survive? What sporting events? I hope it wasn’t European football run by capitalist states.

I disagree. If I can not improve my station there is no point in working hard, furthering my education, getting an education to begin with, taking a chance on innovation, etc…

Someone has to come up with “what get’s produced.” If that party doesn’t have incentive to innovate there will be nothing for the wokring class to produce in short order.

Hell, people today already accept “free” food and money to do nothing when McDonalds is hiring. You think all of a sudden people will have drive because they get a piece of what they produce. That already happens, it’s called a salary.

[quote]
Workers make everything in society, every single thing. We would have iPods and big ass TV’s, we just wouldn’t have a capitalist extracting surplus value off the workers who make it.[/quote]

Yes they do, but in almost every case it isn’t an idea/product they came up with. They also don’t typically know anything about producing, selling, marketing, etc… said idea/product. All they know is there single job (often very well).

They also don’t have the resources for R&D, unless you think farmers are going to give crops away for R&D, which 9/10 will produce nothing.

Times are a lot different now than 10th century Spain. There is no purpose behind producing an Ipad…

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:

But you haven’t addressed the massive anarchist economy in a big part of spain during the spanish civil war that worked, it flourished. Some families had lots of kids, some had no kids. I don’t get your point.[/quote]

You are talking about a single city, during wartime and expecting anyone to seriously entertain the idea you could apply that model to a nation of hundreds of millions of people?

Well, variations of one system has been working pretty well for a long ass time now, leading to exponential prosperity. And then you have the former USSR, North Korean & Cuba. Lets not forget how awesome Pol Pot was…

Lol, if they could do that, they already have. People get promoted.

[quote]nd it is in the interests of the capitalist to keep the means of production private and use wage slavery to create surplus value.

[/quote]

Wage slavery? Please provide some documentation for any skilled position that doesn’t pay a wage.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:
What incentive was there to work in catalonia during the anarchist phase? there is incentive to work so you can eat, get new clothes, have nice dinners at the communal restaurants, so they could have education and go to the pub and have sports events etc etc.
[/quote]
I don’t know anything about Catalonia. Do they produce anything other than essentials to survive? What sporting events? I hope it wasn’t European football run by capitalist states.

I disagree. If I can not improve my station there is no point in working hard, furthering my education, getting an education to begin with, taking a chance on innovation, etc…

Someone has to come up with “what get’s produced.” If that party doesn’t have incentive to innovate there will be nothing for the wokring class to produce in short order.

Hell, people today already accept “free” food and money to do nothing when McDonalds is hiring. You think all of a sudden people will have drive because they get a piece of what they produce. That already happens, it’s called a salary.

[quote]
Workers make everything in society, every single thing. We would have iPods and big ass TV’s, we just wouldn’t have a capitalist extracting surplus value off the workers who make it.[/quote]

Yes they do, but in almost every case it isn’t an idea/product they came up with. They also don’t typically know anything about producing, selling, marketing, etc… said idea/product. All they know is there single job (often very well).

They also don’t have the resources for R&D, unless you think farmers are going to give crops away for R&D, which 9/10 will produce nothing. [/quote]

I don’t know how to isolate things you said so I will just respond like this dude.

Yes they were former private owned teams, the footballers collectivised the team and the fans took over the stadiums.

Catalonia is in spain, it was Anarchist collectively run for a long time until the fascists with help from mussolini and air support and weapons and financial backing from Nazi Germany won the war against the republicans, communists, anarchists and other resistance groups. But a massive section of spain was ran along Anarchist lines without wages or police etc etc and it worked and productivity actually increased from its previous capitalist economy.

Again saying they don’t have the resources would be true in a capitalist economy, after an anarchist revolution there would be no currency and no capitalist enterprise, I am not saying workers should run everything in capitalism because obviously thats impossible, I am talking about a different economy, based on workers producing to provide what workers want. So everything we produce now and more, without the value system of capitalism there would be no impediment to producing as much as possible. No millions of tonnes of food a year dumped to keep illusory “value” systems capitalism has to enforce to keep the capitalist economy from tanking.

Again obviously none of what I said would work in a capitalist system. I am talking about a non monetary, non statist society.

we have seen it work in reality as I said for instance in catalonia, until it was crushed by the fascists. Ultimately it would have to be global like the capitalist economic system is now. I think it will definitely come about, maybe not for hundreds of years or until monopoly capitalism has breathed its last laboured breath, but i am sure we will see it.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Times are a lot different now than 10th century Spain. There is no purpose behind producing an Ipad…
[/quote]

10th century? What the hell are you talking about?

1936-1939

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

There has and always will be someone in power. [/quote]

And this whole point will continue to be ignored, lol.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

There has and always will be someone in power. [/quote]

And this whole point will continue to be ignored, lol.
[/quote]

people believed the earth was flat. That never changed
women were owned with the same recourse as chattel have.That never changed
There was no such thing as private property for non royalty and the aristocracy.That never changed
There was no such thing as cars or engines.That never changed
It was legal to beat your wife.That never changed
It was punishable by death to read the bible.That never changed
There was no such thing as democracy.That never changed.
There was no such thing as agriculture.That never changed.
There was no such thing as capitalism.That never changed.

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

There has and always will be someone in power. [/quote]

And this whole point will continue to be ignored, lol.
[/quote]

people believed the earth was flat. That never changed
women were owned with the same recourse as chattel have.That never changed
There was no such thing as private property for non royalty and the aristocracy.That never changed
There was no such thing as cars or engines.That never changed
It was legal to beat your wife.That never changed
It was punishable by death to read the bible.That never changed
There was no such thing as democracy.That never changed.
There was no such thing as agriculture.That never changed.
There was no such thing as capitalism.That never changed.[/quote]

Weren’t you giving me shit about not addressing points before?

So, in your utopia, things, non living things just magically distribute themselves? Lol

So, at some point in the future mankind won’t have to pass anything out, food will just magically appear on a diner plate. Logistics, a thing of the past.

lmao at this nonsense. This is great.

No more moving things from point a to point b. They just are. And why is that? Because you can’t beat your wife anymore… Yes sir… Only in PWI.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

What if family A has 1 kid and family B has 15 kids? Do they get more stuff? Who decides that?
[/quote]

Ah yes… Only a handful of questions in and you’ve come across one fatal flaw in the ludicrous utopian theory.

Who indeed collects, tracks and distributes the resources? Because that Who, is the Who with all the power. That Who has all the guns, because people will give up their guns for the food the Who has. That Who has all the currency (resources). That Who is the tyrant.

[/quote]

There has and always will be someone in power. [/quote]

And this whole point will continue to be ignored, lol.
[/quote]

people believed the earth was flat. That never changed
women were owned with the same recourse as chattel have.That never changed
There was no such thing as private property for non royalty and the aristocracy.That never changed
There was no such thing as cars or engines.That never changed
It was legal to beat your wife.That never changed
It was punishable by death to read the bible.That never changed
There was no such thing as democracy.That never changed.
There was no such thing as agriculture.That never changed.
There was no such thing as capitalism.That never changed.[/quote]

Weren’t you giving me shit about not addressing points before?

So, in your utopia, things, non living things just magically distribute themselves? Lol

So, at some point in the future mankind won’t have to pass anything out, food will just magically appear on a diner plate. Logistics, a thing of the past.

lmao at this nonsense. This is great.

No more moving things from point a to point b. They just are. And why is that? Because you can’t beat your wife anymore… Yes sir… Only in PWI. [/quote]

Thats you being insane again. Pointing out things that always were that stop being is a valid response to your dumb, deterministic point of lola people always been in charge lollol

You are literally the only person in the thread constantly spewing out retarded one liners which make no sense and are not debatable, because they don’t mean anything.

You a couple pages ago

You can’t address the point so you say things about the person who said them

you page later

Karl marx was a self hating jew.

IRONY. Understand it for goodness sake.


Catalonia>unrelenting reality

[quote]Kareem Said wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Times are a lot different now than 10th century Spain. There is no purpose behind producing an Ipad…
[/quote]

10th century? What the hell are you talking about?

1936-1939[/quote]
Lol, it was the first date on Wikipedia. I guess that’s what I get.