Isn’t sad people are more concerned that a guy with a Jewish daughter married to a jew used a star shaped symbol in attack ad than actual crimes committed by Hillary?
Sorta like losing a lawsuit over antitrust violations to the DOJ? Or perhaps sorta like the fraud lawsuit nominee Trump will be forced to testify in soon?
It really boggles my mind how Trump gets a free pass from his supporters.
Isn’t it sad you guys chose to support a guy who this kind of stuff all too easily sticks to? Pretends not to know who David Duke is (does) and fails to immediately repudiate his support after an interview question. Runs on mass-Mexicam horde rapist language…He “assumes” “some” are good people. Wants to ban all Muslims from coming in (some recent signs of walking that back a bit). Has been often seen to reduce women down to their looks (Bill Clinton’s women troubles were merely the fact they were “ugly” for example).
Because people are going to pick careless over alt-right, race-baiting, conspiracy nut-jobbery. You might as well be trying to sell David Duke at this point.
Apparently, she didn’t negligently leak US secrets to my country’s enemies. Do you have proof to the contrary or is George W. Bush’s Deputy Attorney General, James Comey, in on the fix too?
One of the candidates has lost a lawsuit to the DOJ. The other has not.
Oh, I’m sorry, I wasn’t aware candidates could break some laws and get a pass while other candidates can allegedly break other laws and not get a pass.
See, that’s rub of it, he acts like he knows nothing about David Duke and the folks who support Duke (and him).
But he’s clearly on record as “knowing about David Duke.” As you just demonstrated, by the way. Sort of like his attacking Hillary for her attacks on Bill’s women. Or, problem women I suppose. But the record shows, Trump attacked those same women and called Bill the victim…
We did. And it was demonstrated clearly that the best he could muster was that some could be good people…Well, he could only bring himself to assume some were good people.
He said he had a bad ear piece. What are you up in arms about? I thought it was his failure to disavow Duke?
Could it be at least possible to you that a man who meets tons of people constantly may not have had the lowly name David Duke " not registered at that moment?
A bad ear-piece doesn’t explain that video…He clearly heard David Duke. He immediately repeats his name and says he doesn’t know anything about him/them (the white supremacy around Duke). That’s an after the fact excuse.
But, wait, which is it in the first place? Bad ear piece ,or he couldn’t remember David Duke?
This coupled with the stat that 80% of women crossing illegally into usa from Mexico are raped along the way is ample evidence from me. The border patrol guards have never formally endorsed a candidate either so they don’t exactly have a political history