Perhaps, but Trump is playing the fear angle. If there are multiple major Islamic terror attacks between now and November, it wouldn’t surprise me if polls started to sway in his favour. Who are we kidding? We are guaranteed at least one more Islamic attack with a double digit body count either here or in Europe prior to the election.
I have Hillary’s high negatives based upon her being a scandal clad exceptionally flawed candidate.
“But Trump has high negatives too”
Yes…but why? He has a big mouth. If he can manage to shut up that can go away or at least be lowered. Hillary is still going to be the 2016 poster child for scandal. the FBI pass today does help that but the way she was passed definitely does not give the public a warm fuzzy feeling.
I’m not understanding your point. PA is one of about 10 swing states Trump would need, and he is currently down in all of them. Yes things can change, but that is a big hill to climb.
You might think it will go that way, and it may, but the last poll Hillary had a 21 point lead. It will need to do more than tighten up. The current evidence points to the exact opposite of what you are saying will happen. Over the last 2 months Clinton’s lead went from 4-7 to 15-21.
1, Benghzi is done and over with. Conspiracy nuts say stupid stuff, smarter GoP question the White Houses’ seemingly all too-eager need to blame a youtube video, and the Dems say nothing is there to blame Hillary for. Long baked into Hillary’s run, either way. And still more liked than Trump.
Good luck having to resort to e-mail scandal plan B, “Ok, so she was careless, at least.” She was careless, but we pretty much ALL knew that. Unfortunately, with Trump, your only hope was that she would be indicted.
Well, IF the refusal to indict over the e-mail was political then the logical prediction is that the foundation scandal will see a similar fate…
The fact is either Trump or Hillary will be elected. If you don’t vote for Trump then yes you do help Hillary.
if you want a couple of more left wing loons on the Supreme Court then you are going about it the right way. You will help wreck the country for generations to come.
First of all it was the millions of voters that decided to give Trump the nomination, not the party. You are going to have to correct that because you keep saying it.
LOL…I would never make that bet. Much easier to drop from PWI for one year as I promised to do. But oh my you said you would drop for a lifetime.
[quote=“Sloth, post:125, topic:218984, full:true”]
1, Benghzi is done and over with. Conspiracy nuts say stupid stuff, smarter GoP question the White Houses’ seemingly all too-eager need to blame a youtube video, and the Dems say nothing is there to blame Hillary for. Long baked into Hillary’s run, either way. And still more liked than Trump.[/quote]
Not so fast Sloth. Either you do not remember or just don’t fully understand how Benghazi can be exploited in TV ads around the Country. Again check the Swift Boat ads that sunk the Kerry campaign. People don’t like inept leaders that get people killed.
Yes, what a wonderful thing to put on your resume. “I am careless when it comes to high security matters” And then Benghazi piggy back on that. Not a pretty sight for her.
It may, it may not. But it does hang in the air does it not?
The only three republicans to win PA over the past 50 years was Reagan twice, Nixon once and Ike twice. My point is if Trump is virtually tied in PA I’d say that’s pretty good news for his campaign.
First of all it was the millions of voters that decided to give Trump the nomination, not the party. You are going to have to correct that because you keep saying it. [/quote]
Nope. This is where you’ve fallen short. He is the party’s nominee. The GoP gave us Trump. The GoP is now Trump. And Trump is the GoP. His stink, the explicit race-baiting, women objectifying, would be war criminal cloying stench of it finally and firmly attached to the GoP to the Democrats’ delight. What a gift. This wasn’t just about losing to Hillary, this was about the future of the GoP.
Yes, according to your link Trump is currently 11.7 pts. (average of polls) behind Hillary in NJ. I agree he has a lot of work to do. But Christie (another republican I dislike) is quite popular in NJ. Are you disputing that having him on board will help Trump gain the ground he needs?
But, after viewing his choices for the Supreme Court I feel much better than allowing another nut ball like Sotamayer to join the high court. And Hillary will most assuredly do such a thing.
No, you will. People like you and Push who whined about our early warnings about Trump. You guys are responsible for having helped nominate Hillary’s dream opponent. And you’re responsible, alongside the full-blown Trump crowd, for the lasting damage done to the GoP (as a possible opposing force to the Democrats) well beyond this election. Trump was the Democrats’ “See, told you they were like that!” opposition candidate. And the GoP put their stamp on it.
Christie has been on board the Trump train for a while now, and the polls are moving in Clinton’s direction. I’m saying that based on the evidence, that theory is not supported.
And just to add more to the view that Trump is a conspiracy-nut, race/ethnic/religiosity baiting, loon…His campaign may have used an image from an often violence-tinged, white supremacy, alt-right loon gathering…GoP’s candidate, folks…