Where’s the actual article. I’d like to read the context.
I am saying that it isn’t.
1 Like
I don’t remember…
You know, I’m sitting here and I’m a little confused as to why you’re even upset about the Hitler comparison. Aren’t you the poster that praised how efficient the Nazi’s were at rounding up the Jews and suggested a Trump administration should do the same?
1 Like
Then I don’t understand what you meant by you comment?
My point exactly. Why bother discussing his child care policies when people say stuff like this?
That’s your position…
And if we did the same analysis for white voters we wouldn’t find something similar?
I’m pretty sure Trump gave up on the grass roots conservative vote a while ago. Some will vote for him just because he isn’t Hillary, he won’t be winning over the rest. Politically I’d actually say it’s a pretty good move for him, he needs to grab some of the soccer mom vote. The fact that he’s been more reserved lately helps feed into this and not scare them away.
Using Ivanka to promote it is also a good move, it helps remove some of his personal liability in the conservative arena regarding growing government.
Either Trump is finnally getting some decent campaign advise or finnally starting to listen to it.
Ya, I agree very much with you.
You are spot on with your post. Kellyanne Conway his new campaign manager is very sharp and he seems to be listening to her.
I agree that you believe your hallucinations you have of my position are real
Raj, you stated that case to me. I said there was a cost of deporting people, you claimed I didn’t believe in the holocaust and how efficient the Nazi’s were at rounding up Jews. He is accurately stating your position that you presented to me and they were you words, not something usmcc is making up.
I believe you evade the exchange by saying that sometimes you say things just to see what people will do, which is basically a way of backing out of your position because it is indefensible.
Edit: I believe it was in the Next President III Thread but I can’t find the thread.
1 Like
Maybe I misread comment flow.
My observation is that Raj said open borders, nation building, and agreeing to most Democrat policy are equal to what is called Conservative. I opine that these are NeoCon objectives and ‘Alt-Right’ is actually the path this country has trod most of its existence. Most not all - Monroe Doctrine or TR’s Big Stick. Finished with statement that Trump base is closer to Jackson - Don’t mess with me or,
As a note, I can see consternation with conservatives with maternal leave as another govt program. I also see that Trump has to make some move to overcome the false narrative that being against abortion (GOP for far longer Trump sigh) is a ‘ism’ against women’s bodies rather than a stand against murder.
Hope that clears it up.
You got this stupid retort from professional buffoon and goofy spoon-bending “persuasion” guru Scott Adams. Just thought I’d point that out.
Edit: so we can add languid plagiarist to your other adjectives (to wit: dimwitted, racist, MRA, loser).
For all the Trump supporters that hate the establishment Republicans so much, why is he acted so much like an establishment Republican?
They and he have no problem with big government, they just think they can run it better.
Well, the Democrat primary part two has been interesting.
Your argument appears to be that immigration should be restricted in part - really, in large part - because of the ideological shift in politics that will occur, mainly that the influx will mean greater support for liberal policy as opposed to conservative?
So our immigration policy should be set to make sure one party’s ideas prevail over another’s?
Come on Raj. You might be a die-hard Trump cultist, but you’re generally an honest one. You really didn’t suggest Trump learn from how the Nazi’s rounded the Jews as a means to round the illegal Mexicans up?