Ah, just as I suspected. An itchy miserable cunt.
You should start a blog or something. You could probably garner a pretty good following of people suffering from confirmation bias in the coming years.
Yeah. And smh is acting like the pres. just snaps his fingers and Pow! military action ensues on a unilateral decision.
…and I’m the dumb one?
The one advocating for war crimes? The one calling for torture? The one who doesn’t know what the nuclear triad is, yet rants without rest about the need for American “strength” in the international realm? Least “militaristic”? He’s certainly the most illiterate of international affairs and national security policy.
1 Like
POTUS is commander in chief and has quite a bit of latitude via-a-vis defense policy. Trump has called for American forces to commit war crimes. You endorse him, because, hey, it might be “entertaining” to have a nescient, miserable fuck as president. Pretty dumb.
It isn’t about “militaristic,” it is about intellect and judgment and reason. Often, these things lead us correctly to war. The war simply has to be right. There is literally no reason to think it would be right with Trump. (Btw, is he the least militaristic when he is promising to murder women and children? Or is that just to win the al-Qaeda vote?)
He says that to g3t people fired up. And it works.
Oh? You have an insight into his heart of hearts? Maybe he’s a fucking idiot who has no place commanding an JROTC outfit, much less the United States military. Even if he says it to “fire people up”, whoever those miserable fucks must be, he’s still an imbecile of the highest order. As are his supporters.
P.S.; one should be pretty “fired up” when a front-runner for the next POTUS calls for American forces to violate domestic and international law by commiting blatant war crimes. If not, you’re in the aforementioned miserable fuck category.
This sort of anti-intellectualism is exactly what lead to Trump, the GOP’s Frankenstein monster.
If you check your and skyz previous posts you’ll notice that the trump campaign has been one of scorched earth since it’s rise. You admitted yourself that a substantial amount of Trumps support wants the establishment to burn. Why are you surprised that they establishment fires back with the same strategy?
I agree it would be best if they could ride the wave and use it but unless Ted can pull it off I would not be willing to set aside principles for a win in November with Trump.
What I wrote is objective fact, not questions up for debate. He’s on record advocating war crimes and torture. He’s on record not having the faintest idea what the nuclear triad is. He’s on record as being uniquely and inarguably unsuited to be commander and diplomat in chief. You may not support Trump, but you aren’t doing anyone any favors by sticking your head in the sand.
Clearly they don’t know how to do that, so how would you have gone about it?
Up for debate, given his defense “prescriptions”. Regardless, least-“militaristic” isn’t necessarily a good thing. Preeminent American military power is a foundation stone of the American made world order. The POTUS should understand and appreciate all of the instruments of statecraft, especially military force. Trump is assuredly far behind in this regard.