I don’t know if that is a picture from Paris or not, it may be, but I don’t take your word on much.
In any event, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is, but this “globalism” phenomenon in which your blaming these condition isn’t new. I was in France in the late 90s and the ghettoization of North African immigrants was atrocious then.
Which makes your claim that Trump suddenly changed his mind because he “discovered” these conditions in the past three years is asinine.
Fact is, Trump is taking you and all other nativists for a ride. He’s marked you and your ilk for the suckers you are, ridden your ignorance to the nomination, and should be win, will have no desire or ability to deliver on this neo-Know-Nothing platform.
[quote=“thunderbolt23, post:3317, topic:212571, full:true”]
I don’t know if that is a picture from Paris or not, it may be, but I don’t take your word on much.[/quote]
Not at all. People are slowly waking up to globalism and how it’s turning the West into the 3rd world.
Plus even if he did know, rich businessmen only benefit from globalism. Why would he take an anti-globalist position as a businessman?
You may be right, we shall see.
Basically every politician other than Bernie Sanders has a history of changing their minds. If this is an important point for you, then you might as well withdraw from the political process completely.
Here’s my belief as to why globalism is being pushed and what’s lead to rise anti-globalists like Trump and people like him around Europe:
Governments around the world are running out of money, are in massive debt and their local taxpayer base is shrinking (see: white fertility). So instead of relinquishing this power, scaling back the size and scope of government, they import hordes of people. High iq immigrants increase the taxpayer base while voting democrat, low iq immigrants increase state dependence and vote democrat for free stuff.
If you guys want to believe he has an ulterior motive, all I can say is we shall see.
I’ve stated this before:
I believe he’s wildly succeeded throughout his life and is satisfied with his achievements at age 70. He is now focussed on his families future long after he’s dead and a globalist society is a bad one. When a man hits a certain age he starts to think deeply about his legacy.
I love it. The Middle East is in shambles in large part because of our policies there over the past 16 years and we’re confused as to why people are fleeing to places like Greece, France, and other European nations. I mean jee, why would you leave such an awesome place like Iraq or Syria where you can get beheaded for praying incorrectly.
If I say shanty towns are a developing country thing and you find out there is a 0.05% presence of shanty towns in developed countries, does this statement become a lie to you?
I’m following along here, but usmcc is probably one of the better posters for backing up his arguments with facts and sources.
You said: “shanty towns are a developing country thing”
He proved they’re not.
You then make up a statistic: “there is a 0.05% presence of shanty towns in developed countries” while moving the goal posts (your initial statement never said anything about percentages).
People who actually know how to debate, use facts, are willing to admit they don’t know everything, and don’t blindly follow their biases. Aka, not you.
Shanty towns are not a developing country thing. We have shanty town, right now, in the U.S. There have been shanty towns in the western world for hundreds/thousands of years. History didn’t start last year.
Nice made up statistic too, by the way. At least, it seems, you figured out how percentages work over the weekend.