Another question: Is it immoral that blacks voted overwhelmingly for Obama solely on the basis that he’s black?
If not, then my position of preferring to vote for someone of my gender isn’t immoral.
No I did not, women’s happiness has been on a steady decline since the women’s liberation movement.
[quote]
The lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years by many objective measures, yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate that women’s happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to men. This decline in relative wellbeing is found across various datasets, measures of subjective wellbeing, demographic groups, and industrialized countries. Relative declines in female happiness have eroded a gender gap in happiness in which women in the 1970s reported higher subjective well-being than did men. These declines have continued and a new gender gap is emerging – one with higher subjective well-being for men. (JEL I31, J16, J28)[/quote]
[quote=“therajraj, post:3092, topic:212571, full:true”]
No I did not, women’s happiness has been on a steady decline since the women’s liberation movement.
I understand moving the goal post is a standard tactic in debate, but you are one of the worst offenders if this that I have ever conversed with.
You said:
The link you provided does not support the notion that women (read all women) are best suited and most happy being stay at home mothers relying on their husbands for financial support. What you wrote is laugahbly absurd and, yes, I’m well aware of your average dependapotomus…
[quote=“anon50325502, post:3093, topic:212571, full:true”]
The link I posted shows that as women entered the workforce in droves their happiness declined. When women enter the workforce they cease being full-time home makers. What the fuck do you expect me to post? You’re asking for something that cannot exist
What about this?
Ya because your claim is absurd…
Everyone got it? Women are best suited to being subservient, but it’s cool, because she’s equal. Because subservient means equal.
And up means down.
You’ve reached peak clown. Impressive, Raj.
1 Like
There’s only like 158,000,000 women in America, but lets draw conclusion based on a survey of 558 of them.
Makes sense…
This discussion reminds me of a hilarious Gavin Mcinnes trolling session.
Skip to 0:53
The man is the patriarch of house but their roles in terms of importance are equal. Men lead women follow
ignore the huge study I posted because it doesn’t encompass every single woman in America… This to you isn’t stupid
Why in the world would I pay for access to a study that I know isn’t going to prove the claim that you made?
Edit:
You actually read the study and not just the abstract I assume?
Out of curiosity, what’s the longest relationship you’ve ever had?
Recently, a female agent was shot to death in line of duty. I had known her for around 5 years, good marriage, two small children, tough, very tough. This conversation concerning the role of women needs to be in the “Stupid Thread”. BTW , its the height of arrogance to hijack someone’s thread to pontificate your own views on an entirely different subject. You want to discuss your views on what a woman needs to be happy, by all means go for it.
3 Likes
This is correct…however it is relevant to the fact that the next president may be our first female head of state. So the discussion is pertinent to that line of conversation.
My point was, if he wants to discuss “subservient woman” or the “woman’s role” in the relationship he could start his own thread.
1 Like
Appeal to emotion fallacy
I was asked whether I’d vote for a woman and I explained my position.
Don’t want to discuss this topic? That’s up to the people of this thread
No, it isn’t…
1 Like
Recently, a gay couple was shot to death while protecting their adopted gay son. I had known the couple for around 5 years, good marriage, two small children, tough, very tough. This conversation concerning gays right to adopts belongs in the “Stupid Thread”
Surely I converted you with my strong argument for gay adoption?
You guys want to drop this discussion? That being the case this is my final post on this topic, assuming no one creates a new thread.
Read any women’s fantasy novel, whether it be 50 Shades of Grey, 9 1/2 weeks or your garden variety romance novel found in an airport bookstore. They all follow the same underlying theme of a woman taken, clothes forcibly torn off and thoroughly dominated by an over-the-top masculine figure. Self-Confidence and exquisitely suffocating domination of the males characters caused the women to fall so helplessly in love with them that the women would happily go along just to keep their love. It is not only best to place women in subservient roles for the happiness of men, but also for the happiness of women. These books, coupled with real world observations tell us what women want.
Adopt a position of dominance and women will revert to their naturally submissive essence faster and more profoundly than you can scarcely imagine, and no amount of feminist propaganda will stand in the way of their joyous, if not relieving surrender to a man’s intoxicating dominance and confidence.