It’s a tough situation. You “turn the screws” on a terrorist’s kids and they might very well become terrorists themselves.
Their women aren’t exactly free.
I donno, I think we have to thumb our noses at their beliefs and live as freely as possible to combat their evil. Plus kill the terrorists of course. I’m all for killing the terrorists.
[quote=“pushharder, post:2061, topic:212571, full:true”]
Like I said, I withheld a direct response to Sloth’s stooopid question because it served the purpose of egging him on to produce more hyperbole which he did with flourish.
If we keep letting him go, Trump’s original statement would evolve into something akin to this: PUSH! ARE YOU OK WITH OUR MILITARY CRUCIFYING INFANTS UPSIDE DOWN [/quote]
I suppose you imagine he meant to figuratively kill them. Like, with kindness…
Wow, the dodges are so darn cringe inducing…
Did he say “kill women and children” in that clip? Or did I just miss it?
What if the kid had a bomb strapped to his chest? How high is your horse at that point?
What if the terrorist is toting a gun at the age of 13.
What would you do?
Here is the thing and I’m not sticking up for Sloth or trying to argue with you, but people on here have been making assumptions about what Trump means since jump street. This is mainly because no one actually knows what he means.
Push and I argued about his closing the internet comment because we interpreted the statement differently, for example.
He’s just such a shitty candidate, though… Which is why I think people freak out when he says almost anything.
Depends entirely on the situation, but if he points it at me I’d most likely shoot him. War is hell.
[quote=“UtahLama, post:2063, topic:212571, full:true”]
So you are taking what he said…and telling us what he really meant? [/quote]
What the hell do you think it means? To throw balloon animals their way? Where did you get confused? What?
Did you even try playing the video? Assuming? He proudly defends the friggen position during a debate for crying out loud.
What are you talking about?
And this, this is the sweetest part of your response, because it actually applies to Trump who thought our soldiers would kill and torture whoever he told them to, because he’s a leader. Rewatch it again, if you ever did. He said it. So, it’s Trump you must find “DISTURBING.”
How low is yours? Trump’s statements had nothing to do with armed children. Trump’s statements had to do with scaring the people who say that they, themselves, aren’t scared to die by taking out their families! Right there on video. Defends it during a debate.
I missed the word “kill” in that debate, could you link the time for me, I am on my phone…I saw him say “go after families”.
Look, I’M NOT DEFENDING TRUMP. But I am going to call you on printing things as fact, when you are extrapolating meanings out of statements. You cannot say he advocates shooting women and children in the face…when his quote is “go after families.”.
He may very well want to see that, but you cannot make the statement that he said it.
[quote=“UtahLama, post:2073, topic:212571, full:true”]
I missed the word kill in that debate…I saw him say “go after families”. [/quote]
No, you’re defending Trump. Not only are you defending him, you’re willing to sell out your intellectual integrity to do it. I am dumb-founded that this is your reply. Because, hey, maybe he just meant “take them out on the town for a night of laughs and merriment.”
I’ve been on PWI since 2001…and Sloth, I have never seen anybody go full on crazy over a subject like you are with El Trump.
We get it, he’s an asshole…nobody is arguing that fact. But you are literally saying that anybody who does not agree with what your interpretation of his speech is… i.e. SHOOT WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE FACE…some sort of sell out.
He never said that, you claimed he did.
That’s all I pointed out…even though I made it clear that I was not voting for him, nor defending what he ACTUALLY said.
You need to dial back the rage a tad, and see that I am not disagreeing with you…it’s just that you have extrapolated data with your own emotional investment.
It’s hard to have a discussion with somebody who is so over the top emotional about something.
I can make the statement because I haven’t sold out for the sake of running against the Democrat party, or Hillary specifically. I’m not going to stoop to suggesting that maybe he could’ve meant “take them out for ice-cream” or some such nonsense.
Dude, seriously…read that again, that is not an argument based on any sort of reason.
Nobody knows, and everybody argues, about what Trump is saying, or means to say, or said, or thinks, because Trump himself doesn’t fricking know. Because he’s looney tunes, because his motivations are only that everyone is listening, and that most of those listening luv, luv him…
Cruz said it best to O’Reilly last night: (paraphrasing) what Trump says in the morning can be different than what he says at noon, which might then change by the afternoon; and if you gave the guy a lie detector test, he would pass it with flying colors, every time.
Helps me, and I don’t find anything objectionable about what you wrote.
[quote=“UtahLama, post:2075, topic:212571, full:true”]
I’ve been on PWI since 2001…and Sloth, I have never seen anybody go full on crazy over a subject like you are with El Trump.[/quote]
Anybody who is obstructing this man’s political defeat, or even just sits on the sidelines, has gone crazy. Why do I say that, look at the links above.
An asshole? That’s putting it mildly considering the clips posted above.
Yes, I am. Because I don’t believe most of these people are stupid. Instead, I think they’ve simply sold out their humanity and morality. And are willing to sell out their own dignity when they make fools of themselves by suggesting he meant anything but killing them…
[quote]He never said that, you claimed he did.
That’s all I pointed out…even though I made it clear that I was not voting for him, nor defending what he ACTUALLY said.[/quote]
Then you’re either incredibly dumb or a sell out. Which is it? You can’t follow the context of the questions and the answers? Or, you’re willing to keep pretending not to know that he (and the questioners) was speaking of, so as to not to have to admit it to everybody and yourself that the man is vile.
As for not supporting him…Sorry, I don’t believe it. Nobody is willing to argue such a silly objection (“maybe he didn’t mean killing” wth?) , making themselves look entirely foolish, unless they were enamored with the man.
No. Why? See the links above.
Annnnnnd I’m out.
If I don’t agree with what you believe the meaning of his words are, I am dumb?
Dumb for wanting actual quotes saying what you were quoting him as saying?
This is not a political discussion, this is your church, and not a healthy one.
Dumb, or a sell out for pretending not to know he was talking about killing them. Yes.