Yeah that’s just what I’m suggesting. The news story reads far better that a strange video online caused this mess when in fact it was the Obama/Clinton Libyan policy. And with an election 7 weeks out…do the math
21+ committees of Republicans and Democrats. Buck McKeon concurs with the fact that support could not reach the embassy in time to help. I don’t know what more you want.
The judicial watch reports don’t say anything to the contrary. I just skimmed them, though. Feel free to point our where they talk about support reaching the embassy in time.
Push, I know you like Cruz - why do you think he hasn’t been able to ascend and put Trump on the ropes?
(Serious question.)
Cruz is supposed to be the “true conservative” with the momentum of all these GOP victories at his back - a real right winger (not a moderate), smart, ambitious, willing to take a hard edge in rhetoric, etc. How did he not cruise to easy victory over a reality star?
He was talking about civilians.
“The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families,” Trump said on Fox News earlier this month. “They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families.”
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428719/kill-terrorists-families-gangsta-trump
*Not a huge fan of national review, but they had the quote…
I dunno about shooting a child in the face, but I believe this is what Sloth is referring to.
Hilarious. You do know people can read around here, right? Let’s see the personal attacks I made on you. Chop chop.
I haven’t seen this lack of integrity in a PWI debate since the days of Lixy and Forlife. I have a morbid curiosity to see how low Zeb will actually go, but I think we should get back on topic, as this can’t be entertaining for anyone else.
Below is additional quote from Judicial Watch article I posted above:
“Destroyers could have responded to the attack,” Schmidt said adding that the military also has “rapid reaction forces” in the region as well as “armed predators.” Air craft could have also been deployed, according to Schmidt, but the Department of Defense (DOD) has refused his requests for records involving the air fleet on that day. “The point is there were enough forces to respond,” Schmidt says.
(That’s Colonel Schmidt)
So no quotes to the effect of Sloth’s go too… “SHOOT THE WOMENZ AND CHILDRENZ IN TEH FACE!!!”
Now lets be realistic for a second, no soldier is gonna shoot a child in the face, unless that child has a bomb strapped around his waist…same with a female.
Although we had no problem nuking entire cities to win wars in the past, that’s not gonna fly now.
This rhetoric is just that…rhetoric.
Just like Obama saying he was going to break the law and let people into the country illegally…oh wait.
All is ask is that we stick to actual facts, not Sloth’s internet visions of what he THINKS THE TRUMP REALLY MEANT.
Again its the pot calling the kettle black. Just about everyone of your posts to me today have been a personal attack. But, if I respond in kind …
So, you sit back attack me and claim that I attack too much.
It would be funny if you were not so pathetic Thunderbolt. As I said at one time you would have laughed at your current behavior.
Pitiful…
Go after terrorists families…that is a pretty sharp difference between shooting women and children in the face.
Ya, but isn’t that just a nice way of saying kill their families? Ya, he obviously doesn’t say “shoot them in the face”. I think Sloth is pretty upset about Trump (more so than even me), but what he is advocating is a war crime and it’s even more disturbing, imo, because he’s convinced the military will do it (a small % would).
Ok. Are you (or Push or anyone else) ok with a policy to kill non-combatant family members, but politely, and not via the face?
I’m certainly not okay with that. But I am okay with tough interrogation techniques to get answers before the scum can strike again.
But many on the left and probably the new TB agrees (just a guess) that we mustn’t be too harsh with the bad guys.
Um, look at my link…He is plainly talking about going after their families (which is their women, children, grand-parents, and whatever) since they don’t care about their own lives. Sorry, Trump wants to kill non-combatant women and children in order to scare ISIS fighters (since they don’t fear for their own lives). That’s him. That’s exactly what he said in the debate. That’s what a Trump voter will vote for, promised murder. As for our soldiers. Yeah, he thinks so damn highly of them he answered, when asked what would happen when our servicemen and women were to ignore those orders…He guaranteed us that would follow HIS orders.
You and I both you with 100% certainty that it would never happen. We are losing this war because we are going far and away over the top to protect civilians…which is probably correct.
Our military is not going to violate 10 different human rights treaties we have signed simply because the president says “do it”.
Do I believe the only way we win this war outright is to turn the screws on the support staff that enables the terrorists (including the families)… yes…would I say do it, no.
Again, this is how a thousand internet memes are born, and enrages a thousand impressionable people like Sloth. To take to the internet, change the original statement…and Volia’…Hitler Part Deux.
Waterboarding? Pfft. We could do more than that! Hell yeah! Booooyah!
So you are taking what he said…and telling us what he really meant?
Look man, I’m not voting for the guy, but your level of assuming what he is really thinking and your knowledge of what the military is obligated to do…is kind of disturbing.