[quote]pat wrote:[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
I do not believe this is true. First, theists have fulfilled the burden of proof with many logical arguments for the existence of God.
Second, atheists have just as much burden to prove why anything exists, rather than nothing.
This burden of proof shift is false. Removing God from the equation doesn’t make the equation disappear.[/quote]
Someone has a short memory.
Guess two threads wasn’t enough
http://tnation.T-Nation.com/...f_god_continued
Okay, so the topic was discussed, like a thousand times. There’s probably closer to 30 threads on the existence of God. Did somebody prove God doesn’t exist? If so I missed it.[/quote]
No, it’s that you had half the PWI forum explain to you the inconsistency (that word again) of your logic, and yet you’re trumpeting about the strength of your arguments again. Thanks, but no thanks.[/quote]
I was arguing for something completely different, not God, first. And that was my argument and I admit it was poor. But I was not arguing the existence of God.
Second, the arguments for God’s existence are not mine, I didn’t invent them. Much smarter people than I did that. I don’t trumpet the strength of my arguments, I argue the strength of other people’s arguments.
So unless you had the drop dead proof that the arguments for God’s existence are wrong, then I don’t get your point.
This thread is about what Richard Dawkins said and whether atheists agree with him that religious people should be mocked.[/quote]
Ok, pat, ignore what you write, eg about burden of proof.
Do you also group people together based on not playing baseball? not being mechanics?
I know I get together with all my non-mechanic friends to hang out and not fix cars. smh
Use your head for once.