priests 5’4 1/2 heath is 5’9"
[quote]sid132 wrote:
priests 5’4 1/2 heath is 5’9"[/quote]
Damn. Well, that goes to further my point of his impressive physique in such a small frame (and by frame I mean height, not width, so don’t start).
I choose Priest.
Then again I’m the exact height as Priest. 
I vote for Heath. His genetics, as far as skin, etc…and the definition he gets in his arms…his side tri pose with cross stiations running amock!
I think Priest has great arms…but Heath wins imo.
DG
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I choose Priest.
Then again I’m the exact height as Priest. :D[/quote]
Yay for short people!
I’d go with Phil heath. (based on the above pictures). Better lines, more definition, better proportions of the biceps:triceps.
[quote]VibeAlive wrote:
bushidobadboy wrote:
HAHAHAHA, I’ve just showed this thread to my my mother (who is down for christmas).
“That is just grotesque”. She said.
Oh well!
BBB
Holy shit… we must have the same mum! lol[/quote]
Holy crap I’m married to your mother!
hahahaha
[quote]crod266 wrote:
only 3 people have opionons on this come on im sure theres more[/quote]
heaths are bigger but how priest built such massive arms on his tiny frame is incredible
best for shape i’d say pries
lee priests arms in this video are very impressive i think 1998 olympia preperation
I think preists arms are cool looking but not sell proportioned, they drown out is narrow shoulders.
all time NEW BB FLEX had better arms than both of them combined!
Phil looks better, but Lee’s arms are bigger. Look at Lee’s triceps…
Priest
[quote]Flexb wrote:
Priest[/quote]
Flexb?
haha
[quote]MISCONCEPTION wrote:
I think preists arms are cool looking but not sell proportioned, they drown out is narrow shoulders.
all time NEW BB FLEX had better arms than both of them combined![/quote]
umm no lol