The Greatest Armed Services Ever

[quote]pushharder wrote:
msd0060 wrote:
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.

Nice post.

Orion, you so desperately want to be perceived here as an intellectual heavyweight but this thread proves you fail so miserably. Your logic and reasoning capabilities are seriously flawed and you’re getting your ass spanked grandly but you keep on flailing.

In that regard I hereby nominate you as the central European version of Lixy - a whiny little America-bashing bitch. So jaded that you actually have delusions of the Swiss Army being the greatest armed service ever. You actually deserve more pity than contempt.[/quote]

Second the nomination.

Without the need to leave the depths of his bat-cave, 300 meters beneath the despised American Embassy, he has finished his revised history of the Navaho, is rewriting the biography of Lincoln–without reading a single reference!–and he has knows better than the German General Staff in 1938 the entire military situation in Czechoslovakia! He is near completion on his thesis by which the gold standard is to be re-established, all the better for us peasants to trade for Austria’s chief products, lederhosen and cookoo clocks. And in one more gratuitous attempt to insult the USA, who better than Orion to lecture us on the illusory prowess of the Swiss Army?

Hmmm…maybe more contempt than pity. Contempt is earned.

[quote]John S. wrote:
For some reason there was the swiss army put up instead of ours, do not fear tho I will give us a look at what a true soldier looks like.[/quote]

You mean this?

[quote]orion wrote:
Scrotus wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.

For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill.

Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.

Thus it is that in war the victorious strategist only seeks battle after the victory has been won, whereas he who is destined to defeat first fights and afterwards looks for victory.

It is best to keep one’s own state intact; to crush the enemy’s state is only second best.

–Sun Tzu

Oddly enough, I don’t get “the army that kicks the most ass is best” from any of these passages.
Hes totallly saying the army that kicks so much ass the battle is won before it even starts is the best. But english is my first language.

And here I thought it means the army that never needs to kick any ass is best.

But then, English is not my first language.
[/quote]

Yeah, we are saying basically the same thing. The army that kicks so much ass that it wins before it even kicks any ass is the best. See, so it kicks ass so fucking hard the ass is effectively kicked before the boot starts swinging. Its like a magic asskicking that you know is coming and you dont want none of, so you quit before you get your ass kicked. But if you are a stupid ass and dont realize your ass is already kicked, it will quickly show you the error of your ways. I hope that wasnt too confusing as English isn’t your first language.

[quote]hedo wrote:
orion wrote:
hedo wrote:
orion wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
So how many tens of millions of people has the Swiss Army freed from horrific oppression and dictatorship? How much does the freedom enjoyed by so many around so much of the world owe to the Swiss Army?

Oh wait, is the answer none and not any?

Doesn’t sound like true greatness to me.

Is that the job of an army? To free other people from oppression and dictatorship? Now even if I agreed for discussions sake that any army ever did more harm than good trying to achieve that, how is that not a form of welfare and how could we possibly hope that a government can make that work in another country when it fails to do so in its own?

But to an ingrate who doesn’t want to admit he owes his personal freedom to the armed services of the United States of America, of course it makes sense that the Swiss Army is allegedly greater. Not only makes sense, but is probably psychologically necessary.

Well the very army that laid the groundwork for several revolutions during and after WWI helped us deal with the consequences afterwards.

I would indeed have preferred to achieve the exact same situation we have now without Hitler, Stalin and WWII, so yes, thank your grandfather for putting out the fires his father poured gas into.

But maybe it is psychologically necessary for you to believe that the history of American involvement in European affairs started ca 1944?

Europes problems were created by Europeans. Unfortunately for the rest of the world they lacked the ability or character to fix them. The Americans had to do it for them and now they resent it since they have lived in a relative era of peace. This attitude is particularly pronounced on the continent and Orion is simply a product of that upbringing. To this day Europe still cannot stand on it’s own militarily and most of it’s armies are hollow or make work programs. Other then Britian most Euro armies would be hard presed to but a division in the field even if they had the desire to do so. That division would last about two weeks before running out of supplies if the US didn’t provide airlift capability.

As to the greatest Military ever. The Swiss Armey isn’t even under consideration. This is merely a mindless point Orion seeks to make so he can spew his rhetoric. Arguing military affairs with Orion is pointless. He is too one dimensional to make it interesting and he assumes his opinion to be fact.

The Swiss Army is small. It cannot project it’s power or manuever with any degree of speed. It is vulnerable to blockade or isolation. In other words it can simply be ignored and isolated. Since the Swiss have a history or diplomacy they would no doubt seek terms if faced with starvation. Those terms would be dicated by the aggressor.
If your military can only fight a holding action while you seek surrender terms, you are not the “Greatest Military Ever” Hardly in the same ranks as the US, Britian, Australia, Russia and China…the only worthy competitors for that title in modern times.

No Hitler without Versailles, no Versailles with the US.

So, US involvement was undoubtedly a conditio sine qua non for Hitler´s rise.

That does not put the blame on the US, but it shows that government actions tend to have unintended consequences. If an American conservative like you fails to see that the minute the American armed forces are involved it is probably a result of your upbringing?

Then, your idea of “greatness” when it comes to a military is a military that is able to reach out and make other people bow to its will, merely successfully keeping the homeland safe does not seem to be enough.

That however is an army that is more fitting for an empire, not a republic and I think the founders of your republic agree with me.

No Versailles without the Europeans and all of the problems and character flaws in your leadership. The fate of the Europeans has always been in their own hands put they have chosen to shift that responsibility to others.

What you are doing is asking a question and then changing the parameters of what you think is an acceptable answer.

You need to try someting new rather then simply repeating back what is provided to you if you want to be taken seriosuly.

No doubt those that brought you up would be proud. The rest of us merely amused. It’s been institutionalized in you. No other line of reasoning is possible as your response has pointed out.

[/quote]

I thought germanies decent into naziism was caused largely by frances requirement of large reparations, negatively affecting germanies view of the world, and making them want to break the treaty. caused a big scene kinda. Then hitler shows up saying, “I will fuck them bitches up and have them shaken in der boots!!!” So they just ate that up. and stuff.

…lol @ thread!

Also, your big hard on for the swiss army is actually for the swiss diplomats and leadership. Unless they have a general running the country as a dictatorship. The army is supposed to do what the elected leadership says to do, at least thats how it works here. So if the army is off fighting some dudes, and you dont aggree with what they are doing, its because our politicians sent them too. They are doing there duty. Just because the swiss leadership would rather suck nazi dick and hide on their mountain then fight doesn’t offer any insight into the greatness of their army on any level.

Besides, you there in Austria are still sour that we kicked your Nazi ass’s.
Dont let him trick you with their Germans were nazis and the Austrians werent bullshit. THey had a big hard-on to join Germany and be Nazi’s and it didnt take but saying “Hey Franz, wanna join up and be Nazi’s with us. Ve vill fuck dem bitches up and have dem shaken in der boots!!!” to have them join Nazi Germany and be Nazi’s too. Besides, his hero Adolf was Austrian as well.

So the point is you dont like US policy, and you dont like US leadership. Chances are, in 4 years you still wont. If we just up and left Europe and left you guys to your own devices, you would blame all your new problems on us as well. You dont have a beef with the US army, they do a damn fine job doing what they are told, and that is what an army is supposed to do(within reason of course).

[quote]ephrem wrote:
…lol @ thread![/quote]

Fuck you i was going for a three peat you son of a bitch

[quote]Scrotus wrote:
ephrem wrote:
…lol @ thread!

Fuck you i was going for a three peat you son of a bitch[/quote]

Looks like you couldnt stop me could you hahaah!!1

[quote]Scrotus wrote:
Scrotus wrote:
ephrem wrote:
…lol @ thread!

Fuck you i was going for a three peat you son of a bitch

Looks like you couldnt stop me could you hahaah!!1[/quote]

…there’s no stopping you, you tight bunned testosterone raging muscle monster you! ((-:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
msd0060 wrote:
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.

Nice post.

Orion, you so desperately want to be perceived here as an intellectual heavyweight but this thread proves you fail so miserably. Your logic and reasoning capabilities are seriously flawed and you’re getting your ass spanked grandly but you keep on flailing.

In that regard I hereby nominate you as the central European version of Lixy - a whiny little America-bashing bitch. So jaded that you actually have delusions of the Swiss Army being the greatest armed service ever. You actually deserve more pity than contempt.[/quote]

I do not wish to be perceived as anything.

The constant attacks on my person, personality, origin and whatever else make it interesting to start a debate around here.

If I am such a dolt, deal with my arguments.

Telling me my logic is flawed or analyzing my motives for doing anything ,hardly refutes one thing I write, but according to you that should be no problem whatsoever.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
orion wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
But to an ingrate who doesn’t want to admit he owes his personal freedom to the armed services of the United States of America, of course it makes sense that the Swiss Army is allegedly greater. Not only makes sense, but is probably psychologically necessary.

Well the very army that laid the groundwork for several revolutions during and after WWI helped us deal with the consequences afterwards.

I would indeed have preferred to achieve the exact same situation we have now without Hitler, Stalin and WWII, so yes, thank your grandfather for putting out the fires his father poured gas into.

But maybe it is psychologically necessary for you to believe that the history of American involvement in European affairs started ca 1944?

I knew you’d prove my point with your reply. Thanx
[/quote]

Well , I am sure the voices in your head agree.

Why you visit a discussion board to debate them shall remain your secret.

Thank you for the possibility to listen to your inner monologue.

[quote]300andabove wrote:
Can i just add, PLEASE PLEASE do not take this guys take on the worlds great armies or the US in general as to what Europeans think about the US.

Unfortunately we have ALOT of socialism here, where people seem to equate power with badness.
[/quote]

Socialists equate STATE POWER WITH “BADNESS”?

What is your problem?

[quote]hedo wrote:
orion wrote:
hedo wrote:
orion wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
So how many tens of millions of people has the Swiss Army freed from horrific oppression and dictatorship? How much does the freedom enjoyed by so many around so much of the world owe to the Swiss Army?

Oh wait, is the answer none and not any?

Doesn’t sound like true greatness to me.

Is that the job of an army? To free other people from oppression and dictatorship? Now even if I agreed for discussions sake that any army ever did more harm than good trying to achieve that, how is that not a form of welfare and how could we possibly hope that a government can make that work in another country when it fails to do so in its own?

But to an ingrate who doesn’t want to admit he owes his personal freedom to the armed services of the United States of America, of course it makes sense that the Swiss Army is allegedly greater. Not only makes sense, but is probably psychologically necessary.

Well the very army that laid the groundwork for several revolutions during and after WWI helped us deal with the consequences afterwards.

I would indeed have preferred to achieve the exact same situation we have now without Hitler, Stalin and WWII, so yes, thank your grandfather for putting out the fires his father poured gas into.

But maybe it is psychologically necessary for you to believe that the history of American involvement in European affairs started ca 1944?

Europes problems were created by Europeans. Unfortunately for the rest of the world they lacked the ability or character to fix them. The Americans had to do it for them and now they resent it since they have lived in a relative era of peace. This attitude is particularly pronounced on the continent and Orion is simply a product of that upbringing. To this day Europe still cannot stand on it’s own militarily and most of it’s armies are hollow or make work programs. Other then Britian most Euro armies would be hard presed to but a division in the field even if they had the desire to do so. That division would last about two weeks before running out of supplies if the US didn’t provide airlift capability.

As to the greatest Military ever. The Swiss Armey isn’t even under consideration. This is merely a mindless point Orion seeks to make so he can spew his rhetoric. Arguing military affairs with Orion is pointless. He is too one dimensional to make it interesting and he assumes his opinion to be fact.

The Swiss Army is small. It cannot project it’s power or manuever with any degree of speed. It is vulnerable to blockade or isolation. In other words it can simply be ignored and isolated. Since the Swiss have a history or diplomacy they would no doubt seek terms if faced with starvation. Those terms would be dicated by the aggressor.
If your military can only fight a holding action while you seek surrender terms, you are not the “Greatest Military Ever” Hardly in the same ranks as the US, Britian, Australia, Russia and China…the only worthy competitors for that title in modern times.

No Hitler without Versailles, no Versailles with the US.

So, US involvement was undoubtedly a conditio sine qua non for Hitler´s rise.

That does not put the blame on the US, but it shows that government actions tend to have unintended consequences. If an American conservative like you fails to see that the minute the American armed forces are involved it is probably a result of your upbringing?

Then, your idea of “greatness” when it comes to a military is a military that is able to reach out and make other people bow to its will, merely successfully keeping the homeland safe does not seem to be enough.

That however is an army that is more fitting for an empire, not a republic and I think the founders of your republic agree with me.

No Versailles without the Europeans and all of the problems and character flaws in your leadership. The fate of the Europeans has always been in their own hands put they have chosen to shift that responsibility to others.

What you are doing is asking a question and then changing the parameters of what you think is an acceptable answer.

You need to try someting new rather then simply repeating back what is provided to you if you want to be taken seriosuly.

No doubt those that brought you up would be proud. The rest of us merely amused. It’s been institutionalized in you. No other line of reasoning is possible as your response has pointed out.

[/quote]

You misrepresent me on purpose.

You understand the concept of unintended consequences perfectly well.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

Yes, sorry for starting WW2 because we ended WW1. You are right, if WW1 had never ended, there would have been no WW2.
[/quote]

Really. And you arrive at this conclusion, how?

The WWI would not have ended part.

Well that is the point of the thread.

Is it?

edited

[quote]msd0060 wrote:
The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality.[/quote]

What place is reserved for those who fuck things up royally with the best of intentions?

Well, Gentlemen, now that we have gone over my lack of logic, my personal shortcomings and terrible emotional scarring due to my origin, could we discuss the topic at hand, which is:

What constitutes a great army and, bonus points, what role should or does it play in a free society.

I am sure that men like you, not being weighed down by the intellectual and emotional shackles I must bear, will soar above me and at least inspire me with their intellectual achievements and the power of their arguments, even if I should not always be able to follow the meaning of their enlightened deliberations.

[quote]Scrotus wrote:

I thought germanies decent into naziism was caused largely by frances requirement of large reparations, negatively affecting germanies view of the world, and making them want to break the treaty. caused a big scene kinda. Then hitler shows up saying, “I will fuck them bitches up and have them shaken in der boots!!!” So they just ate that up. and stuff.[/quote]

And how did it happen that France could demand such war reparations?

Because America intervened, which lead to Germany´s defeat.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
The Swiss were such great fighters that the Roman legions were in awe of them.

The notion that they have never been tested is laughable at best.

“Excellently armed and absolutely free” is how Machiavelli described them in the 16th century. He would likely not change his appraisal today.

Would he say the same of us?

Did you just pull stuff from early AD and the Roman empire to support the current Swiss army (a thousand years before Switzerland was a country)?

We were talking about The swiss in their current state, or so I thought.

Machiavelli isn’t a guy I would want backing up my thoughts on freedom by the way.[/quote]

Swiss mercenaries were feared way back to the ancient Romans.

Later, they ended the supremacy of the heavy cavalry on European battlefields, by basically re-inventing the phalanx.

That not only takes skill, but incredible discipline and intestinal fortitude.

The Vatican has Swiss Guards because those were the very best money could buy. It is like ex-SAS members as bodyguards.

So, while the Swiss Army was never tested, Swiss men were, and no one in their right mind felt like testing an ALL SWISS ARMY.