Since you don’t even understand what you are saying, I’ll try and help you.
If that cake is already made and sitting on display, then a baker cannot refuse to sell it to someone for reasons that violate anti-discrimination laws.
If it is just a “cake” and someone wants the baker to put a message on it, then he can refuse to put that message on it but he can’t refuse to sell it, again, if it violates existing laws.
And finally, no one can force a baker to bake any cake.
Furthermore, your arguments only apply to the most generic of cakes. And don’t even cover cakes that have “Married, forever” directly messaged on the cake.
Yes, they do cover that.
That is anti common sense. He can refuse to put messages on specific cakes, but must sell cakes with that same message in the same context as to which he doesn’t have to produce specific messages…
Tyranny has no common sense.
And a wedding cake that has “Married forever” on it is being awfully optimistic. Now an anniversary cake that has that makes more sense… if it were followed by a “sigh.”
So, the baker must produce specific themed cakes. Why are you wasting our time pretending a all cakes are the same cake?
It’s common sense if you understand the difference between selling an existing good and being forced to create a new good.
No, he doesn’t have to. As far as wasting time, you bumped the thread.
An existing good (a wedding cake, a specific theme) wasn’t produced!
The pretzel like logic of the “now offending anyone” police force is jawdropping.
Why the exclamation point? And what makes a wedding cake a wedding cake?
It’s not about offending but discrimination, bigotry and racism.
Silly question. Or, the buyer wouldn’t be objecting to not being sold a wedding cake…
Not selling wedding cakes…
Waiting.
Yes, the buyer can object to whatever he wants but the court in this case spelled things out when it comes to the law.
Is there a question in there? If there is, I’m sure it has already been answered.
Yes, and you knew that. Waiting.
Lunch, brb
A baker does not have to bake any cake. He does not have to put any message on a cake.
If he already made a cake as you describe I don’t think he would have a problem with you bringing it to church.
Your problem is that you aren’t arguing against the court’s decision as you obviously don’t even know what it is. You are arguing scenarios that the court has already addressed.