The answer is no, the Hell cake won’t be ready.
We’re really busy today. Sorry. Feel free to come grab any cake from our display case.
Nobody needed Mike Pence to arbitrate.
2 Likes
False, I am arguing how convoluted and twisted it is…
It actually isn’t. You might object to the decision but it is pretty straightforward.
Waiting
For?
Waiting.
Edit: eating, one sec
And think of it as any type of cake you want. You can even write whatever you want on it. It is your cake after all.
If a woman can claim she is a man and a man claim he is a woman, then I think when you buy a cake you can call it whatever you want.
Then, at 3, when you get there, the display case is empty!
I totally discriminated, but you can’t prove it!
The American Way!
That’s where the baker screwed up. He should have not made the cake but kept his reasons to himself. But he wanted to look good to Jesus.
To be fair, the potential cake buyers wanted to look good for FecesBook. I mean face book.
“I don’t sell displays…”
Done.
1 Like
What’s a display in this context?
The prop in the display case…
Do you mean cake? I don’t know what props are found in bakery display cases.
Mock-ups.
Some “Social Out Liers” (what percentage of US are devout bakers, what percentage are Gays marrying) are going to Mess Around, and their BS is ultimately going to limit MY freedom!
Whack!
I hope these Jokers are thinking about what they’re doing!
So far…
Cakes are just cakes (flour, etc), but you must sell WEDDING CAKES to homosexuals…Um?
You can’t discriminate. But, it wouldn’t be discrimination to refuse to make a custom wedding cake for a homosexual couple, though they are made for heterosexuals, since those homosexuals can buy displays which might not even be for sale…I mean, what, homosexuals buy the cake the same day of their wedding? Displays that are likely props (or hours and hours old) while the real cakes are directly made for the customer, for a specific wedding, scheduled ahead of time as an order…
Madness.There comes a point when ‘anti-discrimination’ is just tyrannical, freedom-crushing, and flat out stupid…
Just say no, one doesn’t have a right to compel people (by threat of violence) to sell them a wedding cake…The world will be fine.
You kinda missed the boat on this. Once the SCOTUS makes a decision people generally stop caring about arguing the point
Which is foolish. God help us if they rule in favor of further weakening of search and seizure protections.