[quote]Sifu wrote:
The Zionist movement that lead to Jews returning to their ancient homeland got under way in the 1880’s.
[/quote]
True. And ‘Zionism’ generally refers to this modern movement. But it’s also an integral aspect of Judaism and the Jewish people.
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Sifu wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Method_Man, like Clip11, Rohnyn and others, is a Headhunter troll. Leave him alone[/quote]
How can you be shure that they all are the creations of headhunter?
[/quote]
They all write in the same way, create deliberatley inflammatory and extreme statements to start trolling, then when the argument is dying down add more fuel to the fire. All of them start or enter discussions with a series of words cobbled together designed to create a Pavlovian response (see above with all the ‘zionist’ talk from method_man which always raises the hackles round here)[/quote]
I sympathize with the Palestinians the same way I do with other darker skinned people who have had their land stolen and been ethnically cleansed by other white devils. These white devils just call themselves Jews.
[/quote]
Now you are just being plain stupid. Arabs are Caucasian. [/quote]
Take a second look at arabs and other semitic people, they are probably a etnich group of their own or they are a mix beetwen all kinds of people. They are white compared to black people, but are darker than let say a southern europeen or a jew with europeen heritage( askenazi I think they are called ). But at the same time a big part of israels are originaly from all over arabia and they are probably close to their arab counterparts in looks and heritage, so he`s argument arent 100% on point.
ps. Palestinians and other arab groups have lots of sentral asian heritage because of the turkish dominance in the area centurys ago and that they probably also have heritage from the ancient greek philistinian people( aka palestinian )
[/quote]
In other words they are Caucasians.[/quote]
Yes some caucasian heritage, but not caucasian as me for example( if caucasian is another word for white offcourse, not sentral asians who have east asian heritage ).[/quote]
You are almost as clueless as method. Skin color is not a god way to determine race because there is a normal range of variability depending how far north or south ones ancestors have lived. The real indicator is the bones, especially the skull.
a factor of facial recognition in women is they consider men with more feminine features to be more reliable and stable as long term mates. This has driven evolution of the face from our caveman ancestors till now. A big difference between male and female skulls is in the shape of the forehead. In men the brow ridge above the eyes is more pronounced.
So the prominence of the male brow ridge is a real easy way to tell which race came first, second etc… African Bushmen are the oldest race, then the Negro are the next oldest and we can tell this by their reduced brow ridge.
Caucasians are the youngest of the races, have the least evolved skulls and because of that they have the most prominent brow ridge in the men and the women. If you look at the brow ridge on the Arabs they are just as Caucasian or even more so than anyone else.
Sifu: Method man did not mention race, he only reffered to the arabs as being darker than israelis.
So pushharder refering to them as caucasians, where not a good counter argument if we consider your definition
of caucasian.
Second, No I dont know much about the caucasian race, because its a term that is non existent in the norwegian
vocabulary, we refer to caucasians as people from caucasia/sentral asia. Its a very anglo term i guess, and as an outstander I thought it refered to white people.
third: I dont aknowledge the clasification of homo sapiens in different races, because of the potential harm
it can cause. Perhaps extremely political correct of me, but I dont care. Better to be a bit to political
correct than believing in a scientisism that can rationalise oppression of people, because of skin color or skull formation etc.
ah I am done and I am out, dont want to discuss race any farther, bit to dirty for my taste 
[quote]Sifu wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Sifu wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Method_Man, like Clip11, Rohnyn and others, is a Headhunter troll. Leave him alone[/quote]
How can you be shure that they all are the creations of headhunter?
[/quote]
They all write in the same way, create deliberatley inflammatory and extreme statements to start trolling, then when the argument is dying down add more fuel to the fire. All of them start or enter discussions with a series of words cobbled together designed to create a Pavlovian response (see above with all the ‘zionist’ talk from method_man which always raises the hackles round here)[/quote]
I sympathize with the Palestinians the same way I do with other darker skinned people who have had their land stolen and been ethnically cleansed by other white devils. These white devils just call themselves Jews.
[/quote]
Now you are just being plain stupid. Arabs are Caucasian. [/quote]
Take a second look at arabs and other semitic people, they are probably a etnich group of their own or they are a mix beetwen all kinds of people. They are white compared to black people, but are darker than let say a southern europeen or a jew with europeen heritage( askenazi I think they are called ). But at the same time a big part of israels are originaly from all over arabia and they are probably close to their arab counterparts in looks and heritage, so he`s argument arent 100% on point.
ps. Palestinians and other arab groups have lots of sentral asian heritage because of the turkish dominance in the area centurys ago and that they probably also have heritage from the ancient greek philistinian people( aka palestinian )
[/quote]
In other words they are Caucasians.[/quote]
Yes some caucasian heritage, but not caucasian as me for example( if caucasian is another word for white offcourse, not sentral asians who have east asian heritage ).[/quote]
You are almost as clueless as method. Skin color is not a god way to determine race because there is a normal range of variability depending how far north or south ones ancestors have lived. The real indicator is the bones, especially the skull.
a factor of facial recognition in women is they consider men with more feminine features to be more reliable and stable as long term mates. This has driven evolution of the face from our caveman ancestors till now. A big difference between male and female skulls is in the shape of the forehead. In men the brow ridge above the eyes is more pronounced.
So the prominence of the male brow ridge is a real easy way to tell which race came first, second etc… African Bushmen are the oldest race, then the Negro are the next oldest and we can tell this by their reduced brow ridge.
Caucasians are the youngest of the races, have the least evolved skulls and because of that they have the most prominent brow ridge in the men and the women. If you look at the brow ridge on the Arabs they are just as Caucasian or even more so than anyone else. [/quote]
There is no race in the human species.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Bambi wrote:
Method_Man, like Clip11, Rohnyn and others, is a Headhunter troll. Leave him alone[/quote]
Not so sure about all that, but he is certainly a waste of time to even think about.
Even for a white devil like me. :-)[/quote]
So get off my dick, trick. Go back to your little Sesame Street projects and play with your water guns. [/quote]
Hey, it’s not my fault your punk ass is STILL in the 'jects, boy. Don’t take it out on me, slide.
He he.
You ARE fun to play with though![/quote]
And you are all on my nut sack like a gnat on a dog’s dick, trick. And YOU were the one claiming to be from the “projects.” Like I said, Sesame Street projects where you shoot off water guns.
[quote]Sifu wrote:
Now you are just being plain stupid. Arabs are Caucasian. [/quote]
You seem to forget that I live in Jew York. I see them in Brooklyn, the Hasidim selling their blood diamonds, and the ones in Manhattan where I work. Most Jews look indistinguishable from other whites, except for they have bigger noses. But that doesn’t mean shit either, because lots of Italians have big/long/hooked noses. Arabs on the other hand, are darker and have a different look to them. I mean what the fuck… Hitler had to make the Jews wear yellow stars for a reason. That is more of a thing for white racists though.
[quote]florelius wrote:
Sifu: Method man did not mention race, he only reffered to the arabs as being darker than israelis.
[/quote]
Actually I believe it was “white devils who call themselves Jews” as opposed to “Israelis.”
[quote]joebassin wrote:
There is no race in the human species. [/quote]
Well, that depends on your definition of race, but as a social construct there certainly is.
If someone wants to bash your brains in because of the way you look it is at least on some level as real as it gets.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Let’s all pretend to NOT see the huge change in “Method Man’s” writing style when he gets into a discussion and forgets who he “is.”
Mediocre troll.[/quote]
Racist!
Apparently you can take the ghetto out of a man.
I am disappointed that you would stereotype him such…
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
…That is more of a thing for white racists though.
[/quote]
And you have your thing as a black racist.
There is no doubt about it, you are THE most racist poster on TN. But just like RogueVampire you are entertaining.[/quote]
That is doing an injustice to Alffi, he is at least as big of a racist as MM.
I think it is entirely unfair to dismiss his racist credentials just because he is able to make a coherent point and does not post like someone with rabies.
To Alffi, I do not think that I mis-characterized you in any way, if I have please correct me.
[quote]florelius wrote:
Sifu: Method man did not mention race, he only reffered to the arabs as being darker than israelis.
So pushharder refering to them as caucasians, where not a good counter argument if we consider your definition
of caucasian.
Second, No I dont know much about the caucasian race, because its a term that is non existent in the norwegian
vocabulary, we refer to caucasians as people from caucasia/sentral asia. Its a very anglo term i guess, and as an outstander I thought it refered to white people.
third: I dont aknowledge the clasification of homo sapiens in different races, because of the potential harm
it can cause. Perhaps extremely political correct of me, but I dont care. Better to be a bit to political
correct than believing in a scientisism that can rationalise oppression of people, because of skin color or skull formation etc.
ah I am done and I am out, dont want to discuss race any farther, bit to dirty for my taste [/quote]
It isn’t doing harm to acknowledge that there are different races. What is harmful is political correctness taken to such an extreme degree that people are afraid to talk about race. You are asking for people to be pushed over to the other extreme.
Burying your head in the sand and pretending it doesn’t exist isn’t very adult either.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
…That is more of a thing for white racists though.
[/quote]
And you have your thing as a black racist.
There is no doubt about it, you are THE most racist poster on TN. But just like RogueVampire you are entertaining.[/quote]
QFT.
I noticed the style change too…like I said before, nobody is that racist unless they are trying to get a rise out of people… see Farrakhan, Louis.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Let’s all pretend to NOT see the huge change in “Method Man’s” writing style when he gets into a discussion and forgets who he “is.”
Mediocre troll.[/quote]
Racist!
Apparently you can take the ghetto out of a man.
I am disappointed that you would stereotype him such…
[/quote]
Hey, no stereotyping here.
Just some attention to writing style – nobody’s changes THAT much unless the original was an act.
But I think you knew that, eh?[/quote]
You need to find a clue, Sherlock. I never “sounded like Farrakhan” whatever the fuck that means! I can switch gears, trick, you know, from street to professional, but that’s a black thing you wouldn’t understand.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
I noticed the style change too…like I said before, nobody is that racist unless they are trying to get a rise out of people… see Farrakhan, Louis.[/quote]
Another one who needs to find a clue. So people are only “racist” if they “want to get a rise out of people.” Are you fucking serious or just as stupid as a lama? Or better yet, just another moron from a redneck state like pushitinalittleharder?