Only because production didn’t keep up with money supply. All the producers had to do was foresee the massive increase in money supply, increase production massively, and trust that no one would save the money created.
of course, had I just watched a few more YouTube videos I would have known that!
So you don’t know either.
So long as you’ve learned the lesson, I’m happy.
The only reason I was able to learn my lesson is because I watched a YouTube video on how to learn a lesson.
It has helped with understanding how critical language acquisition is during early childhood, something that was already understood by researchers, such as the case of Victor of Aveyron. Chomsky tried to explain the process more thoroughly. With that said, his theory, correct or not, has not helped language education but probably hurt it.
At this rate, you’ll be getting fired, from a bartending job, by the guy who married a girl you had a crush on in kindergarten, in no time.
I have a feeling my wife will have a problem with several parts of this scenario.
As with most purely academics.
I have a lot of higher education and most of it is circlejerk bullshit.
It’s just part of playing the game that often teaches you nothing but checking a box off to allow you to progress and do other things. Right of passage bullshit. Law school after the first year and a half is pure money grab and “paying your dues”. That shit in education needs to stop.
Particularly in the arts and humanities, not so much with math and actual real science.
Guys I just got back from drinking fortified wine with some guys over at the local tire pile. We were trying to figure out new ideas about money and our hooch acquisition processes. This, of course, got me thinking about this thread and how I shouldn’t stress so much about that loan shark who keeps going on and on about that cash he claims to have loaned me.
I explained the illusory nature of debt and money to this brainwashed fool, linking this video for good measure.
Also, law being a graduate education is not a thing found in many in other countries. It’s relegated to undergraduate there.
Law has to be one of the most gate kept fields I have seen because everything from the LSAT to school admission, to Bar Admission goes through ABA.
Wait, why is your eye all black and your arm in a sling?
If you don’t fix this, you’ll have a difficult time achieving true zeppitude.
100%
It is an exclusive club for sure on purpose.
Nah, it’s clearly because money printer goes brrrrrr…
And here. The Hyperinflation Myth | PEGS Institute | PEGS Institute
What the people who use these examples from history fail to identify is that increasing the volume of currency in the economy was not the cause of hyperinflation.
And correlation does not mean causation.
Okay, I’m brainwashed on evidence and you on propaganda. now go and be a good lemming and watch some more Morning Joe.
But they keep having them.
Is that your justification for bragging about them?
Well I don’t insinuate because I may be successful trading currencies that automatically gives me practical insight on how federal economics works-like he does.
Maybe those watching real debates don’t want to come to terms with their side losing but determines who wins prior to, are not serious people,
Yeah every professor revolutionizes their chosen field of study.
Are they part of the orthodoxy?
How could you not know this?
Does this make it not true? Are you upset that I didn’t cite it, professor?
Yes a form.
Nah, only his major work in linguistics and being one of America’s leading dissidents.
Oh no! He criticized trust funds but established some for his children. What exactly was he criticizing?
So maybe it hasn’t helped you in any way but his work revolutionized the underpinnings of a field of study and everything that follows from that major change. Are there things that have been revolutionized in science that you may not think have practical application but are important nonetheless?