Again you equate money with being knowledgeable.
Was Chompsky not successful outside his position of being a professor?
Bwahahaha…
Yes it is often what people aspire to do but yeah keep pretending.
And being a successful businessman is a qualification of knowing what one is talking about when it comes to federal macroeconomics-which is something he likes to insinuate.
Noam Chomsky’s linguistic research in the 1950s aimed to understand the tools and means through which children acquire language. He proposed a system of principles and parameters that suggested a child’s innate understanding of syntax and semantics. Although controversial among linguists, Chomsky’s theorization revolutionized and reoriented academic approaches to language.
Yep, just a run of the mill professor.
Pointless to YOU because you have an inability to discern reason and logic. Did you even see the debate? It’s on YouTube(gasp)oh no not that internet station that you can’t learn anything from.
And who believes televangelists? Desperate and brainwashed people. You’d fit right in.
Unlike your pay to play “peer-reviewed” studies.
Sorry not sorry you’ve been indoctrinated by economists at the university level. Most of whom teach garbage neo-classical economics built around the gold-standard. Bwahahahaha…
Have you been able to debunk it? No. You still believe in orthodox economists who’ve been consistently wrong for decades. Now go back to your blankey, suck on your thumb and listen to some more Peter Shiff.
Oh really! Maybe he is just a part of the liberal orthodoxy at universities.
But what have you said? You made a conjecture that is it. No proof, just conjecture. Why?
Sound like a lefty to me.
Have known this for years. WTF, are you talking about? Sit down.
Look it up.
Haven’t bartended in about 13 years. I trade currencies.
For the 837,687 time, who said it did?
If you have built a business from nothing, I would say that is a form of knowledge regardless of your education.
Who the fuck is “Chompsky”? I think you mean Chomsky.
He has been fairly successful it seems monetarily. He is another product only capable of being fostered in capitalism even though he rails against it.
i see why you like him so much. He really contributed nothing of worth to society and provided no actual service or product society actually needs. Chomsky today has a net worth of $5-8 million. And two houses, including a vacation home on Cape Cod.
He has also established trust funds for his children, despite criticizing trust funds.
This is great and I am laughing.
And that has helped anyone how? Except something else a bunch of worthless academics can circlejerk over.
2 Likes
Holy shit…
You took this directly from…
2 Likes
Isn’t that lady you’ve quote about MMT an economist at the university level? Wasn’t Chumpsky a professor?
How would you even know this?
1 Like
Go suck a fat one.
You cling so hard to your chosen dogmas. If i am brainwashed, you are too, simply in another way.
No, pointless to anyone who understands what a debate is and the default psychology of anyone watching a debate.
Again, it’s the standard. Its the standard because other people (even outside the journal it was published in) can review the data or conclusions and comment, while citing the paper.
Pay to Play is in everything anyway.
This still didn’t answer the question. Keep dodging - really makes you look credible.
He looked at some data and made a conclusion - quite literally what every single professor does.
For the nth time, this is purely your hang-up. Most I know do not actually feel this way.
We’ve printed more money in the last 3-years than ever before and we just went through the worst inflationary period of the last 75 years.
Seek professional help.
Sure thing, boss.
Nah, Zep has never plagiarized before. Never… Just waiting on an affiliate link and we’ll be all set for another great thread.
2 Likes
It’s clearly because their production wasn’t maximized you rube…
1 Like