Let me ruin it for you… they are goin off the comic… bane snaps batman’s spine in his own damn house… Bane is like a freaky sub zero lol… watch them make a new batman in a year or two… with fucking megatron in it
Oh and by the by, to the one guy who bashed the actor who plays Bane… you need to do some homework Tom Hardy is pretty fucking fit… he just came off the movie The Warrior.
[quote]Mod Phoenix wrote:
Threads like these are never fun for us moderators.
(Guess who will be reading all of your spoilers in real time on Friday night?)[/quote]
Lol, man your job sucks.
It will settle somewhere in the mid to low 90’s on rotten tomatoes. What raj said is right though, it’s between fanboys and contrarian dumbasses right now. The critics I trust though are saying it’s the movie of the year.
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We, the Guardians of Oa, know you’re a selfish prick, but you’re fearless. Here’s a power ring”…
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[quote]sardines12 wrote:
What raj said is right though, it’s between fanboys and contrarian dumbasses right now. [/quote]
I said that…'king hell.
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
It wouldn’t have been the Avengers without Cap and Thor, actually.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
It wouldn’t have been the Avengers without Cap and Thor, actually.[/quote]
Mr. & Mrs. Joseph P. Audience wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
Yeah I am aware of that…but their individual movies were rush jobs to get to the end goal of the avengers.
I like both their characters, I just felt they deserved better movies which established them as well as Iron Man did.
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
Yeah I am aware of that…but their individual movies were rush jobs to get to the end goal of the avengers.
I like both their characters, I just felt they deserved better movies which established them as well as Iron Man did.
[/quote]
They weren’t rush jobs. I’ll bump both threads if you want to see what was said about them individually.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
Yeah I am aware of that…but their individual movies were rush jobs to get to the end goal of the avengers.
I like both their characters, I just felt they deserved better movies which established them as well as Iron Man did.
[/quote]
They weren’t rush jobs. I’ll bump both threads if you want to see what was said about them individually.
[/quote]
Rush jobs was the wrong term to use.
But they were made for the sake of making an Avengers movie instead of wanting to make the best Thor or Captain America movie possible, thats all i’m trying to say.
And can’t we just agree that Dark Knight Rises will blow ours minds?
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
Yeah I am aware of that…but their individual movies were rush jobs to get to the end goal of the avengers.
I like both their characters, I just felt they deserved better movies which established them as well as Iron Man did.
[/quote]
They weren’t rush jobs. I’ll bump both threads if you want to see what was said about them individually.
[/quote]
Rush jobs was the wrong term to use.
But they were made for the sake of making an Avengers movie instead of wanting to make the best Thor or Captain America movie possible, thats all i’m trying to say.
And can’t we just agree that Dark Knight Rises will blow ours minds?[/quote]
No…
just kidding.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]RATTLEHEAD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]i_am_ketosis wrote:
I’ll admit that DC has had it’s fair share of stinkers, but they also have a stable of excellent films where Marvel has…nothing.
[/quote]
LOL. Marvel have actually made a team-up movie. DC’s studio-made superhero films aren’t within sniffing distance of a Justice League movie. Nolan’s Batman is self-contained, Superman Returns was Bryan Singer’s attempt to make Superman 2.5: a sequel/reboot if you will, and Green Lantern was a moral lesson to a Maverick wannabe. “We know you’re a selfish prick, here’s a power ring”…[/quote]
Avengers was cheapened by having Thor and Captain America made just for the sake of establishing the characters to be able to make a viable team up movie.
Especially Captain America, imagine how insanely awesome it would be to have all these self contained stories and characters meet up instead of feeling like the movies themselves were created as a stepping stone and the characters just created to be a part of a larger picture.
I sound like I hate Marvel which is completely untrue, I fucking love Spiderman 2 despite it seeming somewhat controversial around here haha.
EDIT GREEN LANTERN WAS THE WEAKEST SUPERHERO MOVIE IN RECENT MEMORY
[/quote]
They wouldn’t have made The Avengers without Cap and Thor.[/quote]
It wouldn’t have been the Avengers without Cap and Thor, actually.[/quote]
Cap actually isn’t on the original roster.
Stupid motherfucker posted a bad review of the movie without even seeing it, got banned from Rotten Tomatoes though!
One thing’s for sure is that you could take Hawkeye and Black Widow out and John Q. Audience would not have known they were missing.
Was stoked to see it this Saturday in IMAX then read a dissapointing review and now im bummed. For me its a 3 hour round trip plus a babysitter plus 34 for admission for two. Worth it? I may just wait for it on red box.
[quote]kappa927 wrote:
Was stoked to see it this Saturday in IMAX then read a dissapointing review and now im bummed. For me its a 3 hour round trip plus a babysitter plus 34 for admission for two. Worth it? I may just wait for it on red box.[/quote]
I guess if you hear one bad review it would only make sense not to go.
