The Brutal Battle: Two Personalities..Who Wins?

There are roughly two type of people battling over the planet. Who will win?

(1) â??The Something-for-Nothing Personalityâ??, which appears in
the final decades of the demise of EMPIRES and is the catalyst and driving force
behind the collapse of the economies in which they reside. They vote for a living and
ask public servants to confiscate wealth from others and transfer it to themselves.
This group is fully in control of the G7 and are crony capitalists, elites, public
servants, trade unionists and welfare recipients, just to name a few. Locusts, which
strip economies BARE and eat the roots of wealth generation until the empire
collapses under the weight of inextinguishable debt, unpayable entitlements and sovereign defaults through various means.

(2) â??I Will Work 60 hours a Week for a Better Life for Myself and My
Family.â?? This personality is diametrically opposed to the â??something for nothingâ?? personality. They take nothing for granted, they are rugged individualists and have the work and savings habits upon which wealthy societies and economies are built. Wealth creation, rising middle classes and REAL incomes explode higher in the same manner the United States and Europe once did.

http://www.alternativeinvestingfacts.com/tedbits/tedbits-Dec23-09.pdf

the 2nd one will win out. With the crisis that will happen this year/next year that should pretty much kill the something for nothing attitude.

[quote]John S. wrote:
the 2nd one will win out. With the crisis that will happen this year/next year that should pretty much kill the something for nothing attitude.

[/quote]

I hope so. But any financial crises would hit the 2nd personality hardest, don’t you think? In a perfect world, you can work hard for YOURSELF, to get yourself out of trouble without stepping on toes, but in this world it seems like the people who step on others face no consequences and do not have to worry.

F for Fail

Your posts get more obvious every single time!

If you really think of yourself as some kind of thought provoking troll please make us think.

He read an article that he found interesting.
He produced a synopsis, a link, and put it out there for discussion should anyone else want to delve into it deeper.
If you don’t like it you don’t have to participate.
If you have something better, please post.

This sounds like typical bullshit to me and freeloaders are not the cause of decline, but a consequence of it.

While there will always be lazy people, they are too often used to haze the real causes and act as scapegoats. It makes it easier for people to blame somebody else, instead of possibly examining the real causes and working towards a solution.

It is argument that is used to alleviate blame, as those who work and save their money use it as a get out of jail free card and an excuse to not contribute more to fixing the situation; its the I did my part, what did you do attitude, when in reality I pretty much did jack shit other than what I have always done.

I’m sure theres many people out there who are busting their ass to pull things together, but there is simply the lack of opportunity due to larger dynamics.

I did like how he mentioned how people tend to vote for a living, which resonates with something I just read that likened the voting process of most people in the United States to how they shop for groceries; they typically buy the one that looks and is marketed the best, instead of learning about the nutritional value, company that produces it, etc.

Its purely a spectator activity based on what was presented to them, versus spending the time and effort to educate themselves on the issues and the candidates.

this sounds like something you’d hear the crazy lady on the bus mumbling.

[quote]archiewhittaker wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:
the 2nd one will win out. With the crisis that will happen this year/next year that should pretty much kill the something for nothing attitude.

[/quote]

I hope so. But any financial crises would hit the 2nd personality hardest, don’t you think? In a perfect world, you can work hard for YOURSELF, to get yourself out of trouble without stepping on toes, but in this world it seems like the people who step on others face no consequences and do not have to worry.

[/quote]

When the Commercial real estate market hits we are all going under. The only thing is as you can see with the tea parties, they will revolt if taxes are increased. So the leaches will be unable to kill the host(tax payers) anymore.

[quote]theuofh wrote:
This sounds like typical bullshit to me and freeloaders are not the cause of decline, but a consequence of it.

While there will always be lazy people, they are too often used to haze the real causes and act as scapegoats. It makes it easier for people to blame somebody else, instead of possibly examining the real causes and working towards a solution.

It is argument that is used to alleviate blame, as those who work and save their money use it as a get out of jail free card and an excuse to not contribute more to fixing the situation; its the I did my part, what did you do attitude, when in reality I pretty much did jack shit other than what I have always done.

I’m sure theres many people out there who are busting their ass to pull things together, but there is simply the lack of opportunity due to larger dynamics.

I did like how he mentioned how people tend to vote for a living, which resonates with something I just read that likened the voting process of most people in the United States to how they shop for groceries; they typically buy the one that looks and is marketed the best, instead of learning about the nutritional value, company that produces it, etc.

Its purely a spectator activity based on what was presented to them, versus spending the time and effort to educate themselves on the issues and the candidates. [/quote]

A very old saying (to us old math people anyway): “Crime is easier than Calculus.”

IF the system allows it, it is easier to vote for a living instead of working. Doesn’t this sound a lot like Goldman Sachs and ACORN in action?

The problem then is either: (1) such a system runs out of victims. All the wealth has been stolen and squandered. You then have to borrow. (2) The people being plundered decide they don’t want to be plundered anymore.

Maybe we need a Constitutional Amendment: Government may in no way whatsoever interfere in the workings of the economy.

Nah, the parasites would never let that be voted in.

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]archiewhittaker wrote:

[quote]John S. wrote:
the 2nd one will win out. With the crisis that will happen this year/next year that should pretty much kill the something for nothing attitude.

[/quote]

I hope so. But any financial crises would hit the 2nd personality hardest, don’t you think? In a perfect world, you can work hard for YOURSELF, to get yourself out of trouble without stepping on toes, but in this world it seems like the people who step on others face no consequences and do not have to worry.

[/quote]

When the Commercial real estate market hits we are all going under. The only thing is as you can see with the tea parties, they will revolt if taxes are increased. So the leaches will be unable to kill the host(tax payers) anymore.
[/quote]

Yes, this sector is far worse than the sub-prime situation. And the Feds pretty much played their last Ace already, bailing out the parasites.

…iow, China and India…

I believe that Chris Jericho should get on national TV and address the gelatinous tapeworms to see if any of them can be motivated to change their parasitical ways.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
I believe that Chris Jericho should get on national TV and address the gelatinous tapeworms to see if any of them can be motivated to change their parasitical ways.[/quote]

I do the best I can, trying to be a rational human being. Never initiate violence against another, always be honest and forthright when dealing with others. I therefore simply stand in bewilderment that someone uses government for theft.

Who is Chris Jericho?

Chris Jericho is a WWE wrestler. Quite good. He is known for describing the wrestling audience as being parasites, and quite often specifically as “gelatinous tapeworms.”