The Body Weight Factor

Training
741

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

Truth hurt?

And I rarely post on GAL…and I only complain about X here, If you can find another example of me being negative im my entire posting history…well good luck with that.[/quote]

Yeah you only complain about X here in a fucking forum about training dumbass!

You post nothing here of interest to anyone.

All you post is your “rulez” and then accuse me of being the troll for telling you to STFU.

why don’t you post something related to training for once.

742

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

That’s because you have been here less than a year. You have not witnessed what we have. It may blow your mind to know that many of “haterz crew” used to be friendly with or even defend PX. His condescending posts and inability to have a civil debate with those who have opposing views isn’t being tolerated anymore. In his mind though, he’s never done anything to deserve this treatment. [/quote]

Uhm…if he has been here for a whole year, you are saying that is NOT enough time to see how someone posts?

My posts are still here. I even posted that thread about my training that was started back in 2005. Uhm, if that isn’t enough to see how I post, what is?

Most of the “didn’t you say this” stuff is completely wrong.

If you are doing this because of something written several years ago, please post it so we can get that out in the open.

I really want to see the exact thread that causes such emotional trauma.[/quote]

I’m talking about the stuff you wrote, not the stuff people said you wrote. This why CT refused to back you when zraw asked he was agreeing with you.

I’m talking about stuff like this:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I hope what you just wrote doesn’t make sense to even you.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Thank you for that. I have “doctor” in front of my name but there is always basic shit about biology that I missed. I shall credit that for my weight gain.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I could say that this is one more reason why you should not limit your thinking. You can make huge assumptions when you do. I am a DMD, the type who uses a scalpel and sutures on an almost daily basis.
[/quote]

There’s a reason “I’M A DOCTOR!” has become an common T-Nation meme.

Or more recently, the famous pre-fatigue thread where you completely got the concept wrong, refused to admit you were wrong, but later changed you’re mind without offering an apology.

first…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to “pre-fatigue” my chest on CHEST DAY???[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guess that explains why mine keeps growing.
I’m doing it wrong.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You usually only pre-fatigue a muscle if it is interfering or becoming the optimal mover in an exercise when the goal is another muscle group. [/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That is WHY you pre-exhaust a muscle group…so it fails first and doesn’t interfere with the TARGET muscle group.

That is why pre-exhausting chest on CHEST DAY makes little sense.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to weaken my chest WHEN TRAINING MY CHEST IN PRIORITY??
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am laughing at how the definition got switched.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Now mind you, your own personal experience shows this to be the case…but somehow I got it wrong.

I know this term may be used now in fitness sites, but in bodybuilding historically years ago, I think it meant getting a muscle that fires first when you don’t want it to to tire first.[/quote]

then later…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am also NOT disagreeing with the other concept if anyone is still arguing that for some reason.
[/quote][/quote]

Holy sweet jeebus with the homework…you are an internet ninja.

Can’t wait to hear the excuses, or watch the outright ignore of this post.

743

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

That’s because you have been here less than a year. You have not witnessed what we have. It may blow your mind to know that many of “haterz crew” used to be friendly with or even defend PX. His condescending posts and inability to have a civil debate with those who have opposing views isn’t being tolerated anymore. In his mind though, he’s never done anything to deserve this treatment. [/quote]

Uhm…if he has been here for a whole year, you are saying that is NOT enough time to see how someone posts?

My posts are still here. I even posted that thread about my training that was started back in 2005. Uhm, if that isn’t enough to see how I post, what is?

Most of the “didn’t you say this” stuff is completely wrong.

If you are doing this because of something written several years ago, please post it so we can get that out in the open.

I really want to see the exact thread that causes such emotional trauma.[/quote]

I’m talking about the stuff you wrote, not the stuff people said you wrote. This why CT refused to back you when zraw asked he was agreeing with you.

I’m talking about stuff like this:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I hope what you just wrote doesn’t make sense to even you.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Thank you for that. I have “doctor” in front of my name but there is always basic shit about biology that I missed. I shall credit that for my weight gain.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I could say that this is one more reason why you should not limit your thinking. You can make huge assumptions when you do. I am a DMD, the type who uses a scalpel and sutures on an almost daily basis.
[/quote]

There’s a reason “I’M A DOCTOR!” has become an common T-Nation meme.

Or more recently, the famous pre-fatigue thread where you completely got the concept wrong, refused to admit you were wrong, but later changed you’re mind without offering an apology.

first…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to “pre-fatigue” my chest on CHEST DAY???[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guess that explains why mine keeps growing.
I’m doing it wrong.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You usually only pre-fatigue a muscle if it is interfering or becoming the optimal mover in an exercise when the goal is another muscle group. [/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That is WHY you pre-exhaust a muscle group…so it fails first and doesn’t interfere with the TARGET muscle group.

That is why pre-exhausting chest on CHEST DAY makes little sense.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to weaken my chest WHEN TRAINING MY CHEST IN PRIORITY??
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am laughing at how the definition got switched.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Now mind you, your own personal experience shows this to be the case…but somehow I got it wrong.

I know this term may be used now in fitness sites, but in bodybuilding historically years ago, I think it meant getting a muscle that fires first when you don’t want it to to tire first.[/quote]

then later…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am also NOT disagreeing with the other concept if anyone is still arguing that for some reason.
[/quote][/quote]

It really doesn’t get any clearer than this right here…

[/quote]

Oh, and don’t forget when PX called you gay for arguing with him in multiple threads.

But he will continue to play dumb and act innocent.

744

This thread has proven two immutable truths-
1- PX is the less entertaining Eric Cartman of T-Nation
2-Super Saiyan and Brown Disaster are geniuses.

745

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
This thread has proven two immutable truths-
1- PX is the less entertaining Eric Cartman of T-Nation
2-Super Saiyan and Brown Disaster are geniuses.[/quote]

The ammount of quote boxes SS had to build to nail down all those X quotes is unreal.

746

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Once again, do you still believe that fat alone is directly related to insulin resistance and not the entire condition of obesity?[/quote]

Would you be able to expand on what, specifically, you mean by “the entire condition of obesity”?

747

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

A buch of hypocritical posts by X…
[/quote]

It really doesn’t get any clearer than this right here…

[/quote]

Oh, and don’t forget when PX called you gay for arguing with him in multiple threads.

But he will continue to play dumb and act innocent.[/quote]

Science can’t prove I’m gay, so he’s wrong about that.

748

Utah - just want you to know that your posts are of interest to me!

K? ; )

749

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
This thread has proven two immutable truths-
1- PX is the less entertaining Eric Cartman of T-Nation
2-Super Saiyan and Brown Disaster are geniuses.[/quote]

The ammount of quote boxes SS had to build to nail down all those X quotes is unreal.[/quote]

But X had to “go lift” (even though he posted forever after saying it) so when this thread is a page or so longer, it will be easy to “ignore”. SS may have to repost.

750

LOL at SS quotes. I noticed those recurring theme in X’s posts but never really cared enough to pick them all out. Someone REALLY loves beating on dead horses.

751

[quote]Doh wrote:
LOL at SS quotes. I noticed those recurring theme in X’s posts but never really cared enough to pick them all out. Someone REALLY loves beating on dead horses. [/quote]

X said prove it…so he did.

Kinda the point right?

752

re: mayonnaise

get some good tasty peri peri sauce, pour a load of it into your jar of mayonnaise, shake that shit up good.

Boom!

Peri peri mayonnaise.

Delightful.

753

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:

[quote]yolo84 wrote:
the gist is this:
X explains how he himself is near this mystical 80lbs BS no one will shut up about.
the riposte then is he is not natural.
Stu is upheld as more credible largely for being a successful natural BB.
he has taken the EXACT SAME products as X - ergo he is not natural either.
but cos he is regarded as a nice guy, this is ignored.
is that not a double standard? either they are both natural or they are both not.
why aren’t you and others all over Stu’s threads saying he is a liar and a fraud for describing himself as a natural? isn’t he a cheat and a liar?

(btw I have no problem at all with Stu, but this sort of thing is so ridiculous. It is double standards and hypocrisy. Same as you and others ruining multiple threads constantly while accusing X of the same thing.)
[/quote]

I didn’t want to turn this thread into the recent one where someone brought the topic up out of the blue, but remember that at the time (about a decade ago), certain prohormones were perfectly legal, and for the most part, many people didn’t realize just what they were that they were taking. Because of this, you have ‘natural’ federations that had to establish a realistic time period whereby the majority of folks in the know, could agree that any effects would become negligible.

As to myself, the WNBF instituted a 7 year policy on banned substances, and as the old MAG-10 fell into that category, I have adhered to their bylaws in every manner (I had absolutely no intention of ever competing back then.) Also, consider, that I compete against others who must adhere to the same rules. Of course for all I know, they may have used several grams of test a week for years on end before suddenly abstaining. I can only be responsible for myself though. If the WNBF decides to use the term ‘natural’, then it’s their call as the governing body. I make no claims to personally blow past any genetic barriers, be the strongest or biggest guy out there, or exaggerate anything that I have accomplished. I follow the rules of the ‘game’ I compete in. How other choose to describe it is entirely up to them.

I’m not quite sure how this thread even veered into this area. Last I checked, it was just another PX-Sh-tstorm -lol.

S[/quote]

no need to justify yourself Stu

Your name just got swept up in the shitstorm. Like Dorothy’s house.

754

[quote]rds63799 wrote:
re: mayonnaise

get some good tasty peri peri sauce, pour a load of it into your jar of mayonnaise, shake that shit up good.

Boom!

Peri peri mayonnaise.

Delightful.[/quote]
Sounds good I never thought of adding stuff to it maybe tabasco?

755

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

That’s because you have been here less than a year. You have not witnessed what we have. It may blow your mind to know that many of “haterz crew” used to be friendly with or even defend PX. His condescending posts and inability to have a civil debate with those who have opposing views isn’t being tolerated anymore. In his mind though, he’s never done anything to deserve this treatment. [/quote]

Uhm…if he has been here for a whole year, you are saying that is NOT enough time to see how someone posts?

My posts are still here. I even posted that thread about my training that was started back in 2005. Uhm, if that isn’t enough to see how I post, what is?

Most of the “didn’t you say this” stuff is completely wrong.

If you are doing this because of something written several years ago, please post it so we can get that out in the open.

I really want to see the exact thread that causes such emotional trauma.[/quote]

I’m talking about the stuff you wrote, not the stuff people said you wrote. This why CT refused to back you when zraw asked he was agreeing with you.

I’m talking about stuff like this:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I hope what you just wrote doesn’t make sense to even you.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Thank you for that. I have “doctor” in front of my name but there is always basic shit about biology that I missed. I shall credit that for my weight gain.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I could say that this is one more reason why you should not limit your thinking. You can make huge assumptions when you do. I am a DMD, the type who uses a scalpel and sutures on an almost daily basis.
[/quote]

There’s a reason “I’M A DOCTOR!” has become an common T-Nation meme.

Or more recently, the famous pre-fatigue thread where you completely got the concept wrong, refused to admit you were wrong, but later changed you’re mind without offering an apology.

first…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to “pre-fatigue” my chest on CHEST DAY???[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guess that explains why mine keeps growing.
I’m doing it wrong.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You usually only pre-fatigue a muscle if it is interfering or becoming the optimal mover in an exercise when the goal is another muscle group. [/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That is WHY you pre-exhaust a muscle group…so it fails first and doesn’t interfere with the TARGET muscle group.

That is why pre-exhausting chest on CHEST DAY makes little sense.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to weaken my chest WHEN TRAINING MY CHEST IN PRIORITY??
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am laughing at how the definition got switched.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Now mind you, your own personal experience shows this to be the case…but somehow I got it wrong.

I know this term may be used now in fitness sites, but in bodybuilding historically years ago, I think it meant getting a muscle that fires first when you don’t want it to to tire first.[/quote]

then later…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am also NOT disagreeing with the other concept if anyone is still arguing that for some reason.
[/quote][/quote]

It really doesn’t get any clearer than this right here…

[/quote]

Statements like these are actually enough to cause you guys emotional trauma? LOL

756

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

That’s because you have been here less than a year. You have not witnessed what we have. It may blow your mind to know that many of “haterz crew” used to be friendly with or even defend PX. His condescending posts and inability to have a civil debate with those who have opposing views isn’t being tolerated anymore. In his mind though, he’s never done anything to deserve this treatment. [/quote]

Uhm…if he has been here for a whole year, you are saying that is NOT enough time to see how someone posts?

My posts are still here. I even posted that thread about my training that was started back in 2005. Uhm, if that isn’t enough to see how I post, what is?

Most of the “didn’t you say this” stuff is completely wrong.

If you are doing this because of something written several years ago, please post it so we can get that out in the open.

I really want to see the exact thread that causes such emotional trauma.[/quote]

I’m talking about the stuff you wrote, not the stuff people said you wrote. This why CT refused to back you when zraw asked he was agreeing with you.

I’m talking about stuff like this:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I hope what you just wrote doesn’t make sense to even you.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Thank you for that. I have “doctor” in front of my name but there is always basic shit about biology that I missed. I shall credit that for my weight gain.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I could say that this is one more reason why you should not limit your thinking. You can make huge assumptions when you do. I am a DMD, the type who uses a scalpel and sutures on an almost daily basis.
[/quote]

There’s a reason “I’M A DOCTOR!” has become an common T-Nation meme.

Or more recently, the famous pre-fatigue thread where you completely got the concept wrong, refused to admit you were wrong, but later changed you’re mind without offering an apology.

first…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to “pre-fatigue” my chest on CHEST DAY???[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guess that explains why mine keeps growing.
I’m doing it wrong.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You usually only pre-fatigue a muscle if it is interfering or becoming the optimal mover in an exercise when the goal is another muscle group. [/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That is WHY you pre-exhaust a muscle group…so it fails first and doesn’t interfere with the TARGET muscle group.

That is why pre-exhausting chest on CHEST DAY makes little sense.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to weaken my chest WHEN TRAINING MY CHEST IN PRIORITY??
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am laughing at how the definition got switched.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Now mind you, your own personal experience shows this to be the case…but somehow I got it wrong.

I know this term may be used now in fitness sites, but in bodybuilding historically years ago, I think it meant getting a muscle that fires first when you don’t want it to to tire first.[/quote]

then later…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am also NOT disagreeing with the other concept if anyone is still arguing that for some reason.
[/quote][/quote]

It really doesn’t get any clearer than this right here…

[/quote]

Statements like these are actually enough to cause you guys emotional trauma? LOL
[/quote]

Who is traumatized? He asked for proof of how he acts like a trollish ass and we provided it.

LOL

757

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

Insulting you got old, so now I insult yolo. It’s much more gratifying. [/quote]

Ok…just showing the hypocrisy of filling a thread with this crap yet saying you are doing it because I insulted you.

It seems many more can see that now.[/quote]

O RLY??

I smell a rule coming…

  1. Repeatedly quote the few who agree with him as proof that he is correct and say “good post” & “great points.”

Anybody besides anonamous troller YOLO??[/quote]

Csulli is a troll?
[/quote]

I heard you were 285 lean. You should have been an IFBB pro bro.

758

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]dt79 wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]super saiyan wrote:

That’s because you have been here less than a year. You have not witnessed what we have. It may blow your mind to know that many of “haterz crew” used to be friendly with or even defend PX. His condescending posts and inability to have a civil debate with those who have opposing views isn’t being tolerated anymore. In his mind though, he’s never done anything to deserve this treatment. [/quote]

Uhm…if he has been here for a whole year, you are saying that is NOT enough time to see how someone posts?

My posts are still here. I even posted that thread about my training that was started back in 2005. Uhm, if that isn’t enough to see how I post, what is?

Most of the “didn’t you say this” stuff is completely wrong.

If you are doing this because of something written several years ago, please post it so we can get that out in the open.

I really want to see the exact thread that causes such emotional trauma.[/quote]

I’m talking about the stuff you wrote, not the stuff people said you wrote. This why CT refused to back you when zraw asked he was agreeing with you.

I’m talking about stuff like this:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I hope what you just wrote doesn’t make sense to even you.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Thank you for that. I have “doctor” in front of my name but there is always basic shit about biology that I missed. I shall credit that for my weight gain.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I could say that this is one more reason why you should not limit your thinking. You can make huge assumptions when you do. I am a DMD, the type who uses a scalpel and sutures on an almost daily basis.
[/quote]

There’s a reason “I’M A DOCTOR!” has become an common T-Nation meme.

Or more recently, the famous pre-fatigue thread where you completely got the concept wrong, refused to admit you were wrong, but later changed you’re mind without offering an apology.

first…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to “pre-fatigue” my chest on CHEST DAY???[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I guess that explains why mine keeps growing.
I’m doing it wrong.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You usually only pre-fatigue a muscle if it is interfering or becoming the optimal mover in an exercise when the goal is another muscle group. [/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
That is WHY you pre-exhaust a muscle group…so it fails first and doesn’t interfere with the TARGET muscle group.

That is why pre-exhausting chest on CHEST DAY makes little sense.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why would I want to weaken my chest WHEN TRAINING MY CHEST IN PRIORITY??
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am laughing at how the definition got switched.
[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Now mind you, your own personal experience shows this to be the case…but somehow I got it wrong.

I know this term may be used now in fitness sites, but in bodybuilding historically years ago, I think it meant getting a muscle that fires first when you don’t want it to to tire first.[/quote]

then later…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am also NOT disagreeing with the other concept if anyone is still arguing that for some reason.
[/quote][/quote]

It really doesn’t get any clearer than this right here…

[/quote]

Statements like these are actually enough to cause you guys emotional trauma? LOL
[/quote]

Who is traumatized? He asked for proof of how he acts like a trollish ass and we provided it.

LOL[/quote]

You quoted his post in your reply See the last statement

759

[quote]Professor X wrote:

But no science points to a direct relationship with insulin and fat gain. You can not say 1lbs of gain equals x amt of insulin resistance. Obesity is not the same as “:fat gain”. It is a condition that involves many factors.

[/quote]

I know right. All we have are thousands and thousands of obese and overweight people with abnormal glucose and lipid values that improve when they lose the weight and the diabetics who need less insulin and oral meds when they lose weight and exercise. Clearly we shouldn’t pay attention to this.

760


lol dumbass there’s no link between fatness and insulin resistance.

but yes of course having increased fatty acid content in interstitial fluid will stretch fascia and lead to more muscle gains

if your 30 inch thighs aren’t marbled like this, you’re doing it wrong