[quote]kayveeay wrote:
Drivethruhero wrote:
i know im not jay cutler yet
but im a solid 4.5/10 on this site IMO. compared to others.
let’s be honest, you’re probably a solid 4.6[/quote]
That is the best poster thing I’ve ever seen. Excellent.
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
- theres VEEEEERY good chance that im smarter than you. and definately better at math than you’re.[/quote]
I guess we should be taking your SAT math and verbal into consideration when giving you a rating.
You are a massive tool and look like a white Merton Hanks, except he is probably about 3x as strong.
[quote]njrusmc wrote:
You are “definitely” not the best at spelling, that is certain. You talk a pretty big game behind your computer. Don’t insult people you don’t know.[/quote]
Im not hiding “behind your computer”, im actually posting a pic of myself and my progress on a public website. At least I have balls to do that, instead of just flaiming. BIG NOTE: I did not even start first. Hence I proclaim your statement as an utter BS.
[quote]mjc381 wrote:
Drivethruhero wrote:
- theres VEEEEERY good chance that im smarter than you. and definately better at math than you’re.
I guess we should be taking your SAT math and verbal into consideration when giving you a rating.
[/quote]
I never implied that, where are you pulling this from ?
Im open to criticism, I just need SOLID criticism, where each statement is something logical at least. So far its just mindless flaming like the posts keep appearing.
about my writing skills, im not writing an essay (and i am chatting on a forum where many people do not know the difference between your and youre) so forgive me if I dont include " ’ " or capitalize “I” all the time. As long as my messages are clearly readable I dont care to skip a typo or two.
Clearly.
[quote]LiftSmart wrote:
Drivethruhero wrote:
- theres VEEEEERY good chance that im smarter than you. and definately better at math than you’re.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
This keeps getting better and better.
I hope this isn’t a troll.[/quote]
Im not trolling and I can back up everything I said. Youre welcome to ask me calculus 1&2 / linear algebra stuff and we can talk. Or I could write a code in Java for sumthing(obviously not big).
You and max should get together…
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
LiftSmart wrote:
Drivethruhero wrote:
- theres VEEEEERY good chance that im smarter than you. and definately better at math than you’re.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
This keeps getting better and better.
I hope this isn’t a troll.
Im not trolling and I can back up everything I said. Youre welcome to ask me calculus 1&2 / linear algebra stuff and we can talk. Or I could write a code in Java for sumthing(obviously not big).
[/quote]
hahahahahaha great call, Private Joker
im not kidding
I am going to give you some advice. It looks like your program is a powerlifting program, where your focus is strength. You don’t have to ditch this style of workout entirely, but if you are to stick with it I would recommend Westside for Skinny Bastards. It’s a great program that combines powerlifting work with bodybuilding work, I used this program last summer and went from 185 to 205 without noticeable increase in bodyfat(I was bulking but because of the added muscle my physique looked leaner)
What about calculus 3 and 4? And 5? not to mention 7!!! (no one talks about 6 cause 6 is ghey) Why don’t you come back AFTER you’ve graduated and spent some semesters in grad school. So far you’ve only got the face and build of Stephen Hawking…
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
Im not trolling and I can back up everything I said. Youre welcome to ask me calculus 1&2 / linear algebra stuff and we can talk. Or I could write a code in Java for sumthing(obviously not big).
[/quote]
Theres no logical continuation after calculus 4… i mean in calc4 u aleady basically start learning just other distinct branches of math like applied math(like 2nd order differential equations) or pure math(real analysys)
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
Theres no logical continuation after calculus 4… i mean in calc4 u aleady basically start learning just other distinct branches of math like applied math(like 2nd order differential equations) or pure math(real analysys)[/quote]
this is not “Rate my Nerd”. fuck up!
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
U guys can hate all u want. Im making solid progress in both size AND strength, im not plateuing. I eat OK and drink a shitload of whey. Im fairly ripped and when chillin at the pool i usually have the best body among the crowds. Honestly i never said im super strong & super ripped & super huge or sumthing, I have bruce-lee like physique and im happy with it. (its healthy too).[/quote]
oh yess I see it now
look at mr. lees lats would you
oh ya its the part where his armpit is casue I know you dont have that much smarts but your smarter than most here right.
if your happy being skinny so be it.
oh BTW I am pretty sure bruce lee was heavier than you are and he could have lifted more than 2x 35 pound plates.
look you are like my great grandmothers poodle.
all small and frail with a big mouth
all anyone has to do is kick ya out the way every now and then
have fun with your chess there smart guy.
Bruce-lee’s subscalpularis is indeed developed to much greater proportion than mine.
Where does 2 x 35 plates part from tho ?? did u even read my maxes
Who said it had to be logical? Logic is ghey.
And you bear a stronger resemblance to this guy rather than Bruce lee.
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
Theres no logical continuation after calculus 4… i mean in calc4 u aleady basically start learning just other distinct branches of math like applied math(like 2nd order differential equations) or pure math(real analysys)[/quote]
A few years down the road perhaps…
Dear God… I leave town for 2 days and missed all the fun.
[quote]Drivethruhero wrote:
about my writing skills, im not writing an essay (and i am chatting on a forum where many people do not know the difference between your and youre) so forgive me if I dont include " ’ " or capitalize “I” all the time. As long as my messages are clearly readable I dont care to skip a typo or two.[/quote]
It’s you’re actually…