[quote]AttackOfTheChris wrote:
legendaryblaze wrote:
AttackOfTheChris wrote:
I don’t know if it is a photoshop or not but daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn! I wanna see what her ass looks like.
I wanna see the ass of the girl in your sig.
Google Katie Fey or Jenya D.
[/quote]
Thank you, friend.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.[/quote]
Maybe if her arms were a little more developed, but that was just way out of proportion
OMG I wouldn’t come up for air…ever
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.
Maybe if her arms were a little more developed, but that was just way out of proportion [/quote]
I’m not convinced.
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.
Maybe if her arms were a little more developed, but that was just way out of proportion [/quote]
This is Japanese speed skater Tomomi Okazaki.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
jehovasfitness wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.
Maybe if her arms were a little more developed, but that was just way out of proportion
This is Japanese speed skater Tomomi Okazaki.[/quote]
More…
Note, she doesn’t have much goin’ on up top, but then again, why would she (or any other speed skater)?
Vid: Tomomi Okazaki National Record at Salt Lake 2002 - YouTube
Compare quads-to-arms ratio. Being an Olympic speed skater, I can’t imagine she has an ounce of fat on her either.
I’m sort of leaning towards agreeing with Steely on this.
Olympic athletes are typically very bottom heavy, also…
[quote]Zhangkong wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.
It is likely that some of us have spent a considerable amount of time around women with highly developed lower bodies (i.e. cyclists, skaters, sprinters, lifters) and thus can differentiate between reality and a digital fabrication.
I agree with you. The size of the legs of the altered photo, although impressive, are not completely unrealistic in the aforementioned sports when accompanied by many years of heavy, explosive work in the weight room. If it was not known that this was a fabrication, one could say there is significant inconsistency between the size of muscle bellies in the v. lateralis and medialis without accompanying development and or definition in the illiopsoas, sartorius, and TFL, which would give a more pronounced sweep off of her hips. Tough to say from the angle, but really, it doesn’t matter either way. [/quote]
i believed it to be real when i saw it, but i was also wondering because of the imbalances noted above
definitly looked fishy, and not because the muscle that was photoshopped in looked unbelievably large
Ahhhh, well, she’s stilla sexy lady w/o the legs. But legs like that is pretty damn sweet.
MISSION, lets find a babe like that with some sexy legs. Post em’ up here!
My day was just ruined! 
[quote]matso1236 wrote:
Photoshop[/quote]
yep… that is a bad quality photoshop
LOL!
I can’t believe you guys.
[quote]Neospartan wrote:
matso1236 wrote:
Photoshop
yep… that is a bad quality photoshop
LOL!
I can’t believe you guys.
[/quote]
It’s your first post in this thread and you happened to post when we found the original and you are trying to make us believe your a photoshop fake teller expert. Get out.
Wooow! I’m actually surprised it was a photoshop. I’ve never seen such developed legs on a woman without the upper proportions to match. I think it was a good photoshop though. The shapes and light cuts looked pretty accurately portrayed.
Girl was bangin’ no less.
I prefer the altered picture.
…But would gladly take the original.
[quote]Neospartan wrote:
matso1236 wrote:
Photoshop
yep… that is a bad quality photoshop
LOL!
I can’t believe you guys.
[/quote]
fuck your couch
[quote]Fuzzyapple wrote:
Neospartan wrote:
matso1236 wrote:
Photoshop
yep… that is a bad quality photoshop
LOL!
I can’t believe you guys.
It’s your first post in this thread and you happened to post when we found the original and you are trying to make us believe your a photoshop fake teller expert. Get out.
[/quote]
Exactly. It’s easy to play an expert once the proof is in.
I’ll give you that the quads start a little too low down, but a poor quality shop?
I’d hit that, both of them. Twice.
[quote]trav123456 wrote:
Neospartan wrote:
matso1236 wrote:
Photoshop
yep… that is a bad quality photoshop
LOL!
I can’t believe you guys.
fuck your couch[/quote]
hahahaha. pray to god you dont drop that cake.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
This thread reminded me of Squat Girl and why we must appreciate…[/quote]
True. And she is also why it’s such a shame that the original pick is photoshopped - Squat Girl is a butterface.
