[quote]
The original was posted on 4chan, as was this one. Her abs and legs were shoooped
quote]
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
johnnytang24 wrote:
schultzie wrote:
it’s shopped. i dont have the original but I have seen it, and he legs look much smaller in it.
sorry guys
The original was posted on 4chan, as was this one. Her abs and legs were shoooped
This feels like the time my mom told me Santa didnt exist, and then made me go into wal-mart with here even though I was openly weeping. I was one sad 15 year old.[/quote]
Maybe this will make you boys feel a little better.
BG, we’ll miss you now that we’ve moved to the real world.
But dear lord thank you.
[quote]AttackOfTheChris wrote:
I don’t know if it is a photoshop or not but daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn! I wanna see what her ass looks like. [/quote]
I wanna see the ass of the girl in your sig.
[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
WS4JB wrote:
johnnytang24 wrote:
schultzie wrote:
it’s shopped. i dont have the original but I have seen it, and he legs look much smaller in it.
sorry guys
The original was posted on 4chan, as was this one. Her abs and legs were shoooped
This feels like the time my mom told me Santa didnt exist, and then made me go into wal-mart with here even though I was openly weeping. I was one sad 15 year old.
Maybe this will make you boys feel a little better.[/quote]
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
BG, we’ll miss you now that we’ve moved to the real world.
But dear lord thank you.[/quote]
Whats that supposed to mean?
[quote]WS4JB wrote:
BG, we’ll miss you now that we’ve moved to the real world.
But dear lord thank you.[/quote]
By real world, you mean Facebook?
lolwut?
I was told that she doesnt wanna make her real name known, I wanted to send her an invite on FB.
Aren’t you supposed to use Levels in Photoshop too quickly determine if the photo is faked?
Damn she is fine. I would eat that all day.
[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
AttackOfTheChris wrote:
I don’t know if it is a photoshop or not but daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn! I wanna see what her ass looks like.
I wanna see the ass of the girl in your sig.[/quote]
Google Katie Fey or Jenya D.
the original
Yup, I’d still hit it, 2 times.
The original is better !
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.
original is way better. Looks like a woman below waist
People were convinced? You can see pixels down the whole left side of her left leg.
…OR maybe the “original” is the photoshop! eh? eh?
[quote]Zhangkong wrote:
the original[/quote]
Better, IMO.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Even though it is “photoshopped”, it’s sad commentary about these forums that the first thing people would think when they saw someone with exceptionally developed legs (eg. dancer/skater/skier legs), they would assume it’s photoshopped.
I didn’t think the altered photo was that outrageous.[/quote]
It is likely that some of us have spent a considerable amount of time around women with highly developed lower bodies (i.e. cyclists, skaters, sprinters, lifters) and thus can differentiate between reality and a digital fabrication.
I agree with you. The size of the legs of the altered photo, although impressive, are not completely unrealistic in the aforementioned sports when accompanied by many years of heavy, explosive work in the weight room. If it was not known that this was a fabrication, one could say there is significant inconsistency between the size of muscle bellies in the v. lateralis and medialis without accompanying development and or definition in the illiopsoas, sartorius, and TFL, which would give a more pronounced sweep off of her hips. Tough to say from the angle, but really, it doesn’t matter either way.