[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
It’s about the concept of “personhood,” which is semantics. [/quote]
And? [/quote]
Lol…
Like I said, it’s not about science it’s about semantics. [/quote]
Do you know what semantics is? [/quote]
You planning on giving me another free English lesson?[/quote]
It’s my second language which means I am more proficient at it than most who claim it as their first. [/quote]
I guess you know what hubris means than?[/quote]
My people coined the term. BTW, that isn’t an English word. [/quote]
Really cause it’s in the English language. [/quote]
From the Greek.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
It’s about the concept of “personhood,” which is semantics. [/quote]
And? [/quote]
Lol…
Like I said, it’s not about science it’s about semantics. [/quote]
Do you know what semantics is? [/quote]
You planning on giving me another free English lesson?[/quote]
It’s my second language which means I am more proficient at it than most who claim it as their first. [/quote]
I guess you know what hubris means than?[/quote]
My people coined the term. BTW, that isn’t an English word. [/quote]
Really cause it’s in the English language. [/quote]
From the Greek. [/quote]
Like many English words…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
It’s about the concept of “personhood,” which is semantics. [/quote]
And? [/quote]
Lol…
Like I said, it’s not about science it’s about semantics. [/quote]
Do you know what semantics is? [/quote]
You planning on giving me another free English lesson?[/quote]
It’s my second language which means I am more proficient at it than most who claim it as their first. [/quote]
I guess you know what hubris means than?[/quote]
My people coined the term. BTW, that isn’t an English word. [/quote]
Really cause it’s in the English language. [/quote]
From the Greek. [/quote]
Like many English words…[/quote]
Loanwords.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Loanwords. [/quote]
Lol, more semantics…
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Not all. Some are amateurs.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
It’s about the concept of “personhood,” which is semantics. [/quote]
And? [/quote]
Lol…
Like I said, it’s not about science it’s about semantics. [/quote]
Do you know what semantics is? [/quote]
You planning on giving me another free English lesson?[/quote]
It’s my second language which means I am more proficient at it than most who claim it as their first. [/quote]
I guess you know what hubris means than?[/quote]
My people coined the term. [/quote]
Eisai ellenas? Den ixera. Poly kalo.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Not all. Some are amateurs. [/quote]
Well done.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
It’s my second language which means I am more proficient at it than most who claim it as their first. [/quote]
Proficient is more elegantly and more correctly followed by in than at.
Just kidding around, couldn’t resist. You talk English good.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself. [/quote]
People were not murdered in Iraq on your behalf?
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
Now provide a single shred of evidence that the unborn is anything but a human being.[/quote]
Look up the reasons why abortion is legal and you’ll have a list. [/quote]
Provide a single shred of proof that the unborn is not a human being. Where is your proof? Where is your evidence?
Can’t find any? Because there is not any.[/quote]
If it were as you say then abortion would be illegal.[/quote]
It will be, it’s only a matter of time.[/quote]
I hope so as long as it’s for the right reasons.[/quote]
I think the fact that it’s basically sanitized murder, that’s reason enough. There is no other reason, nor another reason needed.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Not all. Some are amateurs. [/quote]
lol…nice 
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
Now provide a single shred of evidence that the unborn is anything but a human being.[/quote]
Look up the reasons why abortion is legal and you’ll have a list. [/quote]
Provide a single shred of proof that the unborn is not a human being. Where is your proof? Where is your evidence?
Can’t find any? Because there is not any.[/quote]
If it were as you say then abortion would be illegal.[/quote]
It will be, it’s only a matter of time.[/quote]
I hope so as long as it’s for the right reasons.[/quote]
I think the fact that it’s basically sanitized murder, that’s reason enough. There is no other reason, nor another reason needed.[/quote]
I meant that I would prefer that women not get abortions not because of legislation, which won’t work anyway, but because they don’t put themselves in that position to begin with. Telling a woman she has to keep a baby she doesn’t want, for whatever reason, creates another problem. I am not the first to mention this but I see the need for a cultural change. Murder is illegal yet it still happens but, we take measures to try and prevent it. Abortion will happen if it’s illegal so we need to do something to not prevent abortions but prevent unwanted pregnancies. If the goal is to “save” children then start before they are even conceived.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself. [/quote]
People were not murdered in Iraq on your behalf? [/quote]
Nope. They were not.
I am unfortunately forced against my will to support through confiscatory taxation such horrors. (I Do choose to support the armed service men and women who are ordered into such action, and hold the highest authority responsible for that choice.) But I did not, nor do I still, think a non-defensive war is appropriate.
So no, still not pro-murder.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself. [/quote]
People were not murdered in Iraq on your behalf? [/quote]
Nope. They were not.
I am unfortunately forced against my will to support through confiscatory taxation such horrors. (I Do choose to support the armed service men and women who are ordered into such action, and hold the highest authority responsible for that choice.) But I did not, nor do I still, think a non-defensive war is appropriate.
So no, still not pro-murder. [/quote]
Isn’t that like saying your against abortion but support those who have them?
I do notice you support the idea of war. That still makes you pro-murder.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself. [/quote]
People were not murdered in Iraq on your behalf? [/quote]
Nope. They were not.
I am unfortunately forced against my will to support through confiscatory taxation such horrors. (I Do choose to support the armed service men and women who are ordered into such action, and hold the highest authority responsible for that choice.) But I did not, nor do I still, think a non-defensive war is appropriate.
So no, still not pro-murder. [/quote]
Isn’t that like saying your against abortion but support those who have them?
I do notice you support the idea of war. That still makes you pro-murder. [/quote]
No, it is not like saying you are against abortion, but support those who are.
Where are the PWI English police when you need them…
Killing an enemy combatant and murder are not the same thing.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
Promurder isn’t divisive language that doesn’t help create an environment for debate that is hostility free? [/quote]
Does pro-murder bother you?
Is anti-life better? Or how about Selective-“choice”-based-on-arbitrary-criteria-only-given-to-some-people-but-obviously-not-all? [/quote]
No. We are all pro murder. [/quote]
Speak for yourself homie. Speak for yourself. [/quote]
People were not murdered in Iraq on your behalf? [/quote]
Nope. They were not.
I am unfortunately forced against my will to support through confiscatory taxation such horrors. (I Do choose to support the armed service men and women who are ordered into such action, and hold the highest authority responsible for that choice.) But I did not, nor do I still, think a non-defensive war is appropriate.
So no, still not pro-murder. [/quote]
Isn’t that like saying your against abortion but support those who have them?
I do notice you support the idea of war. That still makes you pro-murder. [/quote]
No, it is not like saying you are against abortion, but support those who are.
Where are the PWI English police when you need them…
Killing an enemy combatant and murder are not the same thing. [/quote]
I don’t think the person who was chosen to be the enemy shares that opinion. I don’t think the people who had bombs fall on them feel that way. Were the children who died in Hiroshima enemy combatants? Do those who perpetrated 9/11 think it was murder?
