Invade Syria!
Erdogan already did because your Trump gave him the green light.
I didn’t say infantry. There’s a slew of jobs that can (and are) done by older people like you, with true belief in the war they support
People in favor of sending other people off to war usually are. For all the (none) good it does.
Grateful when they go, indifferent when they come back.
That’s unreal. It’s like exactly the opposite speech given just one year ago.
What an embarrassment. “They’ve got a lot of sand over there so they’ve got a lot of sand they can play with.”
If you subscribe to Turkish propaganda and support its ethic cleansing campaign, sure. The PKK is a regionally focused independence movement. It isn’t a millennial or Salafist organization that has aspirations to conduct external operations against the West unlike al-Qaeda’s Al-Nusra Front or the soon to be reconstituted ISIL. No one at the US National Counter Terrorism Center (NCTC) or CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Center is losing sleep over the PKK. They are, however, being kept up at night by the developments of the past few days.
Not to be a moral-relativist (and at the risk of being historically reductionist), Israel was essentially founded through similar tactics. I’m not making a value judgement here, merely an objective observation.
Israel even had a future prime minister that participated:
More germane to the topic at hand, Trump’s shameful betrayal of the Kurds can’t be seen by a reasonable observer as anything less than capitulation to Ankara, Moscow, and Tehran (intentional and unintentional). It will prove to be extremely deleterious to American foreign policy and national security for decades to come.
Against who, exactly? US Special Operations Forces were deployed to Syria in support of the anti-ISIL campaign, Operation Inherent Resolve. Those rightfully criticizing Trump’s imbecilic and repugnant betrayal of our Kurdish allies are not calling for military action against Syria or Turkey.
More relevant to the “need to declare war” argument: under American and international law, the use of force against ISIL in Syria was justified by the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001 and the invitation by the Iraqi government to support its self defense.
This is an emotive and myopic argument. The benefits of forward deployed American SOF in Syria far outweighed the material and human costs (which have been extraordinarily low by the way). Military deployments are rarely as favorable as the ratio observed here.
It’s also worth noting that the SOF community itself is livid about this development. By and large it sees Trump’s cowardly betrayal as nothing short of strategic and moral capitulation.
The bottom line is that US credibility and American counter-terrorism efforts have been dealt decades worth of damage over the course of a few days.
Interesting tidbit - one of the things that surprised me in Jerusalem was the flippant tone of the supposedly “commemorative” plaque for the King David Hotel bombing - “it’s your fault you’ve been blown up”
@doogie, I have to agree with @Bismark. Luckily, his parents would not have to worry about losing him as, in his own words:
(/s)
ROFLMAO. This has to be a parody. Fits too cleanly into the jokes.
We can hope.
What am I missing?
He (apparently unknowingly) compacted about 20 jokes about keyboard warriors/wannabes made by actual soldiers into 12 words.
It’s either a shocking haiku of stupidity and lack of self-awareness or a brilliant parody, depending, I don’t know.
Regardless, I’ve emailed it to friends.
Wait, I see that it’s a quoted post from another poster but I thought it was something that poster had originally quoted. Meaning, I thought it was a joke because it does seem like a typical wannabe story. The poster was actually referring to himself?
I also wonder what kind of maladies would keep someone out given that after 9/11, they had waivers for everything. I remember seeing dudes with asthma inhalers in Basic.
No, sorry. Hard to use quote function with an iPhone. Tend to over delete or lose a closing of the quote.
For clarity, Nick was quoting Bismark. I was commenting on Bismark’s comment.
I thought it was a quote of a quote. I thought Bismark quoted someone else because it seemed like stuff I’ve heard before. I didn’t realize Nick was quoting an actual post that Bismark made about himself. So when you said it had to be a parody or something I was thinking no shit, he’s obviously posting something someone else said, so why mock him? But I was wrong.
So I am clear, you are in favor of American troops being involved with foreign wars?
I am still to old. The only way I could be involved is a military contract where my company would be involved. Otherwise, I would love to be a fighter pilot. The only way to play with the biggest and baddest toys is to be in the military.
