Okay, bear with me here. I don’t really know where I’m going with this, but I may have a general idea.
Just a moment ago, I was petting one of my parent’s cats. It’s fat. Squishing its furry belly in between my hands did bring me great satisfaction and delight, but then I started to wonder…
Are all animals predisposed to genetic limitations / development such as the human animal?
For instance, my parents own four cats. Two are extremely obese, two look like normal cats. They all get the same amount and type of food, and are all indoor cats. What gives?
Now roll with me here, this is where the ride gets bumpy. Let’s take a squirrel for instance. Pretend this squirrel has an instatiable appetite, and bases its diet from high amounts of protein, fat, and fiber (nuts.) Then, for whatever reason, let’s say the squirrel does a taxing physical activity… like carring around another squirrel on its back doing tree sprints or some shit (I’m reaching here.) Would the squirrel not become bigger, faster, stronger?
Now, let’s flip the cards. Say the squirrel doesn’t have good genetics for muscle gain without excess fat gains as well (meso or whatever.) Because this squirrel then has no conscious thought, and can’t look at itself and say “Damn, I’m a fat-fuck now,” is it lazy and unmotivated?
I’m talking about intrinsic conscious thoughts vs. food intake/work output here, sort of. And I’m not trying to make this is a metaphor for humans, because we ARE capable of this kind of thinking.
Does any of this even make any damn sense? This thread sucks.



