[quote]lixy wrote:
Do you or do you not agree that this amendment to the Swiss constitution is openly xenophobic and Islamophobic? If you do, then I’ll remind you that Switzerland manufactured vital components for the Luftwaffe, bombs and provided the Reichsbank with cash for their war effort.
[/quote]
No, I don’t. Maybe to xenophobia-phobes. The Swiss are right to consider the preservation of their culture, the ‘flavor’ of their nation. Especially when considering a political/theological ideology so often hostile to European/Western ideals. I simply don’t like the double-edged sword of the precedent. Or, that it might simply sweep a problem under the rug long enough for it to become irreversible. I’d have kicked out every non-citizen muslim, shut off immigration to them, and allowed actual citizens their minarets.
[quote]
Sloth:
Maybe that vast majority of modernized, intelligent, and energetic muslims we always hear about will stay home and crush the teeny-tiny minority of extremists.
Lixy:
Don’t hold your breath.
The will is there but it’ll take generations.[/quote]
Which is why I want to ratchet up the motivation. Gotta stay home and sort out your own countries. No immigrating, watching your host countries and their allies get attacked, and then bitching when they strike back. No, you get to stay home and clean up your own house. Or, continue to be whiny cowards that can’t do jack back home, while demanding everyone else take it on the chin, not doing jack either. Show the world the power, determination, and overwhelming size of the good muslim population. I’ll be watching.
[quote]
Sloth:
So my concern is that these kind of policies might actually help hide a greater problem. Out of sight, out of mind. Then when things come to a head, you realize political power has shifted and it’s too late.
Lixy:
I understood your point. I even congratulated you for seeing it from that angle (provided it’s an original thought).
In doing so, you sealed the debate and provided a full-proof argument. That is, the ethnic Swiss are doomed no matter what happens, and hordes of Muslims are coming to destroy them/corrupt them/eat their flesh/etc. If the proposition had been rejected, you would see it as a a triumph of Islamic supremacy eradicating the defenseless local culture. But since it passed, you see a problem (you even say “a greater problem”) in that it will “hide” things.
Like I said, kudos! You managed to deadlock the debate.[/quote]
I didn’t imply they were doomed. They could control the future character of their country through immigration policy.