No. We’re ok as long as our corrupt candidate wins. And dissapointed when our corrupt candidate loses.
1 Like
1 Like
Without giving excess credibility to either the atlantic article or the concept of toxic masculinity by posting a meme listing its ‘characteristics’, he shows signs of the latter not the former.
Who do you consider masculine that is well known, out of curiosity?
The only people that do were going to vote for Trump regardless. This is the type of stuff is too conspiracy theory-leaning and simply too far removed from what most Americans care about.
I don’t know enough about what some celebrities are like off screen to really say. I don’t really follow a lot of celebrity stuff to know. I mean I’m not denying he’s a man at the basic sense. But does he really have characteristics of what you would define as manly?
I guess when I think of a man or perhaps an ideal man or someone I would admire (my grandpa comes to mind) he doesn’t hit any category really.
He’s obese, has no humility, no loyalty, shows no respect for others, takes no responsibility, has no intellectual curiosity, and cries about everything. Do real men think before speaking? I believe so.
I’m assuming I know enough about you to believe that it you had a son who behaved like him you would be upset about it?
You don’t think Americans care if their politicians are corrupt? Or if they do they are conspiracy theory Trump voters?
1 Like
Lol. Few actually care about the corruption of their pick. They care about the corruption of whoever they haven’t picked. In that the two sides aren’t so different.
2 Likes
One low level FBI operative has already plead guilty to something from the Durham investigation. For the rest we just have to wait, I guess. I understand they need to get it right, but if Biden wins the investigation will be shutdown. So, there is a bit of urgency needed.
1 Like
They’re already discussing this “new stuff” on Russian State TV. Mostly the stuff Derkach gave Rudy.
At this point I can confidently say it’s very unlikely Hunter Biden wins the election. The GOP is really trying to make sure he doesn’t win and I think they will be successful.
3 Likes
Oh boy is it! There was another document dump, this time to Fox News. The updates include, veracity that the computer was Hunter’s and that Joe not only knew, he was actively involved, especially in China. Where Hunter flew on AF 2 with daddy to conduct shady business.
If it wasn’t for the fact that it’s wasting tax money, I’d love them to investigate the Russia crap again. Just to prove once again, there is nothing there. Because we know the chain of custody of the hard drive. It certainly is convenient, but fact sometimes just are what they seem.
The chain of custody flows like this. Hunter took the laptop in for repair due to water damage, where he signed the repair contract. He bought a part for the computer and brought it to the repair guy. Repair guy had it for months and Hunter never claimed it. Repair guy, concerned about the news decided to see what was on the hard drive because after 90 days of being unclaimed, the computer now belongs to him. Repair guy see a bunch of potentially shady shit. He turns the hard drive over to the FBI who had it until recently.
Now, the FBI had custody of this hard drive while the impeachment scam was going on and they were withholding exculpatory evidence from the Trump team. That’s another story coming out of this.
The reason I am posting the Fox News story is because it is an exclusive. Exclusive means nobody else has it. When other outlets pick it up, I will happily post them, but in the mean time:
1 Like
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!
Russia is everywhere!!! Look behind a tree, a Russian!
“What, that guy?”
“No, he just a white supremacist, behind him, he’s the Russian!”
“Wow! It’s Putin himself.”
Go ahead and die on that hill… Just one thing, PROVE IT.
1 Like
A man US Treasury Department (Trump’s not Obama’s) labeled a “Russian agent” is posing while giving information to Rudy Guiliani. Doesn’t get anymore incriminating than that.
But then again, there’s no proof that could convince you to betray your prophet, isn’t it? It’s a rhetorical question on your part.
1 Like
I can’t get in, the lines are too long…
1 Like
Because of a lot of people or the size of the guts? Could be both.
The hair. The bone spurs. The teenage girl need to respond to any perceived slight on Twitter. The constant crying about being treated unfairly and claiming he deserves this or that.
I don’t find this list compelling at all. How is it different (other than tweeting) from an organized criminal?
@H_factor Admirable or someone to emulate? Not in my book, but there are many examples of hyper masculinity that wouldnt get my admiration. Carrying on in a civil manner should be the rule, unless a situation demands brutality. A man should be able to do both.
I don’t think most Americans care about a convoluted story like this, no. I would say this article sums up my thoughts (and many others’) as to why:
1 Like
But the President can’t do either? He certainly can’t do the first. I’m not sure how he could be brutal? He’s too fat to do anything to you physically. He tries to talk tough but come on. He would have his ass kicked at any point in his life by the vast majority of men.
Is calling other people names being brutal? It’s 6th grade stuff. Someone criticized and he comes back with loser, sleepy, or some other mad lib insult. I don’t consider that brutal. Maybe brutal to listen to.
Effeminate fits to me but if it doesn’t do we really call someone like Trump a real man? But I also don’t think some of these things he has control over. He has mental issues and if he hadn’t been born when he was maybe something more would have been done with he was younger.
For this ‘half the country is happy’ claim to be strictly accurate, t’would’ve been nice to see Trump actually reach 50% approval (per Gallup) even one time by now… alas, he stands alone from all predecessors in failing to meet that mark.
And sure, this is a total nitpick – he has reached 49% approval on occasion, and as recently (anciently?) as May – yet this fact plus his average annual approvals (38%, 40%, 42%, 41% overall) sure seem to indicate that, underneath it all, the so-called SILENT MAJORITY (of Trump supporters) much more resembles a PETULANT MINORITY.
[source of above stats: Was Trump Ever Really a Favorite for Reelection? ]
Exactly. How can this “story” move the needle if anyone who’s even following it at all is almost certainly ‘already voting’ + ‘NOT undecided’?