Supreme Event of the Olympics?

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
So if men & women didn’t compete separately, what events would women finish first in?

[/quote]

Apparently, swimming.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jul/30/ye-shiwen-world-record-olympics-2012[/quote]

Wasn’t her overall time for the 400m 25 seconds longer though? I don’t understand how 50m can be the same and the remaining 350 be 25 seconds longer.[/quote]

Lochte slowed down the final 50 because he had it in the bag. Ye had to come from behind.

I wouldn’t really consider being 23 seconds behind ‘being better at.’

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.[/quote]

I personally think if a sport is in the Olympics, the Olympics ought to be the pinnacle of that sport, where the athletes train for 4 years with one goal in mind. Weightlifting, swimming, diving, track & field, gymnastics, etc. One fucking shot at your dream, and if you blow it, you have to wait 4 years–and maybe never–for redemption. That’s what makes the Olympics so fucking awesome.

If the Sport has another, more important big stage for that sport, it ought not be in the Olympics. I wouldn’t want American football in the Olympics, even though I am a football fan, because having football at the Olympics would be an afterthought for most of the best players, who aleady have the superbowl. It just cheapens the whole event. I’d also do away with basketball as an Olympic sport, as now the Olympics is just an afterthought for most of those guys, and some even seem to view it as a chore to have the honor to represent their country at the Olympics. Fuck that, I won’t watch Olympic basketball even though I am a basketball fan, I’ll watch the other, “lessor” sports where everything is on the line, all or nothing, just this one event.

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.[/quote]

I personally think if a sport is in the Olympics, the Olympics ought to be the pinnacle of that sport, where the athletes train for 4 years with one goal in mind. Weightlifting, swimming, diving, track & field, gymnastics, etc. One fucking shot at your dream, and if you blow it, you have to wait 4 years–and maybe never–for redemption. That’s what makes the Olympics so fucking awesome.

If the Sport has another, more important big stage for that sport, it ought not be in the Olympics. I wouldn’t want American football in the Olympics, even though I am a football fan, because having football at the Olympics would be an afterthought for most of the best players, who aleady have the superbowl. It just cheapens the whole event. I’d also do away with basketball as an Olympic sport, as now the Olympics is just an afterthought for most of those guys, and some even seem to view it as a chore to have the honor to represent their country at the Olympics. Fuck that, I won’t watch Olympic basketball even though I am a basketball fan, I’ll watch the other, “lessor” sports where everything is on the line, all or nothing, just this one event.
[/quote]

Every sport you listed has world championships every year as well as other big competitions that the athletes place a hell of a lot of emphasis on.

There aren’t any sports out there where the only time there’s a big time competition is the olympics. That would be dumb. The whole point of sports is competition. Only competing once every 4 years is completely backwards.

As far as basketball, the only guys that turned down competing for team USA were guys who were injured or had to get surgery in the offseason. (rose, wade, howard) It would seem to me that they do in fact take it seriously. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t go compete. It’s not like guys are turning down the opportunity because noone cares about the olympics. Everyone that they wanted for the team went unless they were hurt.

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.[/quote]

I personally think if a sport is in the Olympics, the Olympics ought to be the pinnacle of that sport, where the athletes train for 4 years with one goal in mind. Weightlifting, swimming, diving, track & field, gymnastics, etc. One fucking shot at your dream, and if you blow it, you have to wait 4 years–and maybe never–for redemption. That’s what makes the Olympics so fucking awesome.

If the Sport has another, more important big stage for that sport, it ought not be in the Olympics. I wouldn’t want American football in the Olympics, even though I am a football fan, because having football at the Olympics would be an afterthought for most of the best players, who aleady have the superbowl. It just cheapens the whole event. I’d also do away with basketball as an Olympic sport, as now the Olympics is just an afterthought for most of those guys, and some even seem to view it as a chore to have the honor to represent their country at the Olympics. Fuck that, I won’t watch Olympic basketball even though I am a basketball fan, I’ll watch the other, “lessor” sports where everything is on the line, all or nothing, just this one event.
[/quote]

Every sport you listed has world championships every year as well as other big competitions that the athletes place a hell of a lot of emphasis on.

There aren’t any sports out there where the only time there’s a big time competition is the olympics. That would be dumb. The whole point of sports is competition. Only competing once every 4 years is completely backwards.

[/quote]

Jordyn Wieber won the all around for women’s gymnastics at the world championships last year. Did you or anyone you know watch that? If you asked Jordan whether she’d trade that championship for the opportunity just to compete in the finals for all around at the Olympics, this year, I am pretty confident I know what she’d pick without even hesitating. Sure there are other big meets, and the world championships are a big deal, but they aren’t the Olympics, and pale by comparison.

Anything with Jessica Ennis in it.

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.[/quote]

I personally think if a sport is in the Olympics, the Olympics ought to be the pinnacle of that sport, where the athletes train for 4 years with one goal in mind. Weightlifting, swimming, diving, track & field, gymnastics, etc. One fucking shot at your dream, and if you blow it, you have to wait 4 years–and maybe never–for redemption. That’s what makes the Olympics so fucking awesome.

If the Sport has another, more important big stage for that sport, it ought not be in the Olympics. I wouldn’t want American football in the Olympics, even though I am a football fan, because having football at the Olympics would be an afterthought for most of the best players, who aleady have the superbowl. It just cheapens the whole event. I’d also do away with basketball as an Olympic sport, as now the Olympics is just an afterthought for most of those guys, and some even seem to view it as a chore to have the honor to represent their country at the Olympics. Fuck that, I won’t watch Olympic basketball even though I am a basketball fan, I’ll watch the other, “lessor” sports where everything is on the line, all or nothing, just this one event.
[/quote]

Every sport you listed has world championships every year as well as other big competitions that the athletes place a hell of a lot of emphasis on.

There aren’t any sports out there where the only time there’s a big time competition is the olympics. That would be dumb. The whole point of sports is competition. Only competing once every 4 years is completely backwards.

[/quote]

Jordyn Wieber won the all around for women’s gymnastics at the world championships last year. Did you or anyone you know watch that? If you asked Jordan whether she’d trade that championship for the opportunity just to compete in the finals for all around at the Olympics, this year, I am pretty confident I know what she’d pick without even hesitating. Sure there are other big meets, and the world championships are a big deal, but they aren’t the Olympics, and pale by comparison.

[/quote]

It would be the same way for rugby. Olympic gold would be the biggest goal and the biggest stage, just like it is for all the other sports.

I completely agree with you about football though. I just don’t see the point in the US destroying Canada every 4 years and collecting a gold medal for a sport that almost noone else plays.

^Anything with Jessica Ennis in it.
QFT.

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:

[quote]Chris87 wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I’ll take the olympics seriously when they reinstate rugby union as an olympic sport (which would be a good example badassery for the Cana… I mean aliens). There are plenty of male and FEMALE rugby teams out there as well as a HUGE international fan base. They use the same size pitch as the football (soccer) event, so it’s not like it would be a major inconvenience.

I mean they’ve got BMX, synchronized swimming, MOUNTAIN BIKING (lol), hand ball, ping pong (fucking PING PONG!), trampoline, and in the winter they have CURLING! But no rugby? Give me a fucking break! Rugby is a far more international game than so many of these other “sports”.

[/quote]

Well, they are going to try rugby sevens this Games.[/quote]

That’s in 2016. And it’s exhibition, so no medals.

It’s complete bullshit. All the fucking dumb ass sports that noone plays, and they can’t put the second most popular sport in the world in the olympics? Really?

And 7s is not the same thing, not even close. 7s versus 15s is like comparing a pick up game of flag football and the nfl.[/quote]

I personally think if a sport is in the Olympics, the Olympics ought to be the pinnacle of that sport, where the athletes train for 4 years with one goal in mind. Weightlifting, swimming, diving, track & field, gymnastics, etc. One fucking shot at your dream, and if you blow it, you have to wait 4 years–and maybe never–for redemption. That’s what makes the Olympics so fucking awesome.

If the Sport has another, more important big stage for that sport, it ought not be in the Olympics. I wouldn’t want American football in the Olympics, even though I am a football fan, because having football at the Olympics would be an afterthought for most of the best players, who aleady have the superbowl. It just cheapens the whole event. I’d also do away with basketball as an Olympic sport, as now the Olympics is just an afterthought for most of those guys, and some even seem to view it as a chore to have the honor to represent their country at the Olympics. Fuck that, I won’t watch Olympic basketball even though I am a basketball fan, I’ll watch the other, “lessor” sports where everything is on the line, all or nothing, just this one event.
[/quote]

Every sport you listed has world championships every year as well as other big competitions that the athletes place a hell of a lot of emphasis on.

There aren’t any sports out there where the only time there’s a big time competition is the olympics. That would be dumb. The whole point of sports is competition. Only competing once every 4 years is completely backwards.

[/quote]

Jordyn Wieber won the all around for women’s gymnastics at the world championships last year. Did you or anyone you know watch that? If you asked Jordan whether she’d trade that championship for the opportunity just to compete in the finals for all around at the Olympics, this year, I am pretty confident I know what she’d pick without even hesitating. Sure there are other big meets, and the world championships are a big deal, but they aren’t the Olympics, and pale by comparison.

[/quote]

It would be the same way for rugby. Olympic gold would be the biggest goal and the biggest stage, just like it is for all the other sports.

I completely agree with you about football though. I just don’t see the point in the US destroying Canada every 4 years and collecting a gold medal for a sport that almost no other country plays well.[/quote]

Fixed that for you.

Carry on

^^^ haha

Honestly, I love watching all the track and field events, along with gymnastics and women’s volleyball (for obvious reasons). Almost everything else bores me to tears. We have NBC up here at work and we are watching the riding competition, which I couldnt give two shits about.

booooooo

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Diving. [/quote]

Water or Soccer?

Soccer? Springboard/Tower.

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Soccer? Springboard/Tower. [/quote]

Men’s soccer players dive, a lot. Subtlety is a lost art.

100 meters for sure. As one of the other guys said , the winner is the biggest star of the olympics.
That’s got to show something !!!

The IFBB aka the Weiders (mainly Ben) spent loads of money to get BodyBuilding into the Olympics and failed. Rightly so!

[quote]oldtimer3 wrote:
The IFBB aka the Weiders (mainly Ben) spent loads of money to get BodyBuilding into the Olympics and failed. Rightly so! [/quote]

HOW. DARE. YOU!

[quote]Consul wrote:
Anything with Jessica Ennis in it.[/quote]

This is the correct answer

After Mo Farah’s performance last night I have a new found respect for long distance track events.

That was one of the best races I have ever seen.

Screw the Olympics, you make him watch “Independence Day”

i guess the 100m if you’re going to be human and civilized about it