[quote]AndrewG909 wrote:
The more I talk to you the more I realize how full of shit you are man. First you make the arguement that my statement about apbt being more hyper then bullies is bullshit, then at the end of your post you accuse bullies of being couch potatoes. Either apbt are more hyper then bullies or they’re not. You seem to agree that Bullies are lazier dogs which I stated is perfect for me.
Then you use your strawmen to make your arguement. I never stated that apbt are more prone to biting people so I don’t know wtf you’re talking with the punish the deed not the breed.
Your statement that apbt are the best dogs to look thru a collar is laughable and at that I’m done arguing with you.
Its obvious that to you pitbulls are the end all be all in the dog world. There’s dogs that I love and dogs that I don’t care for at all. I personally can’t stand chihuahuas but if someone posted a thread about their new chihuahua I wouldn’t go in there exclaiming that dogos are the best dog and chihuahuas are garbage. I don’t give a shit about your opinions on bullies.
You obviously are against bullies and came here with an agenda and I enabled you to spout your bullshit by arguing with you, which I’m done doing.
Lmao @ pitbulls are the best at EVERYTHING. Why bother having other breeds, we should all own pits.[/quote]
Aww young Andrew…lol. In no particular order.
You came here asking about supplements. Question answered.
The apbt is not the best at everything, but it is the finest canine athlete in the world, something you’d think would be respected here of all places. You implied in your post that the cross made to make the apbt was so damn terrible b/c it was for fighting, and I merely replied that it also made one of the most human friendly, remarkable canine athletes ever.
And there is no serious debate among serious pitbull enthusiasts about bullypits - it’s not even discussed. It’s only debated where bullypit people happen to be. They want the dogs to be “pits” b/c again, that appeals to a certain crowd - it’s a form of negative marketing, just like the “we don’t sell dogs for illegal purposes”. And, they want AKC recognition b/c that means they can sell dogs for more money. All I did was refute any reference to the bullypit being a pitbull.
In one breath, the bullypit is badass, in the next, you’re a responsible owner, and yet in the next, you post the worst wannabe pictures of dogs in spiked collars - an image that is ALWAYS negative. So exactly what appealed to you? Not that I care.
I don’t think the pit is the best at everything. It’s why I also own patterdale terriers and a dogo argentino. But a good pitbull can do damn near anything.
As for hyper, I just simply said the bullypit is not canine athlete. That does not mean by comparison, the pitbull which is in an athlete, is necessarily “hyper”.
