Paul I know you are a believer in rest pause training. My question is has there been any studies that you know of that show why rest pause training is considered better by some than regular training?
Example:
3 sets to failure with a 2 to 3 minute rest between sets…
compared to
3 sets to failure with a 20 to 30 second rest
Thanks for the reply. But my only problem with that study is the 3 sets of 6 at 80% is not 3 sets to failure.
A better comparison would have been 3 sets to failure at 80% with 2 minutes rest.
When some westside lifters do the repetition method they do 3 sets to failure with 3 to 5 min rest as opposed to short rests… Just trying to figure this out.
Well I guess another good question would be What Iin your experience has worked better for you? Because you’re 350 method is similar to what I’m talking about with a longer rest of three sets Max reps. But you’ve also done rest pause. What gave you better results?
Dude… Just do a friggin block (3-6 weeks) of rest-pause training and see how you respond. If you don’t respond it will make fuck all difference in the long run. If you do then you found out something really useful to you.
There is no study, which will almost certainly have data collection issues and will come with a chance of error, that is going to give you better information than that block of training.
I compared it to 3 sets of max reps with 2 or 3 min rest. Like Joe Defranco does with his NFL guys and did with me when he trained me for my NFL tryout.
U misunderstood. But thanks anyway