[quote]Chushin wrote:
If you google the teacher’s name, you learn that she is black, and that race is, or at least has become, part of this story.[/quote]
Her race is irrelevant - why hasn’t she been fired?[/quote]
Spend a month living in Detroit, Oakland, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington DC, New Orleans, Los Angeles, cities that all take turns being the MURDER CAPITAL of the U.S.
These cities all have one thing in common.[/quote]
[quote]Chushin wrote:
If you google the teacher’s name, you learn that she is black, and that race is, or at least has become, part of this story.[/quote]
Her race is irrelevant - why hasn’t she been fired?[/quote]
Spend a month living in Detroit, Oakland, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington DC, New Orleans, Los Angeles, cities that all take turns being the MURDER CAPITAL of the U.S.
These cities all have one thing in common.[/quote]
They have more than one thing in common. But the two important things, while having nothing actually to do with the point I fear you are trying to make, are 1) horrid education systems which lead to awful economic conditions, and 2) a measurable lack of self respect, pride or sense of self worth beyond what name brand jeans they are wearing.
The problems in the cities you list have zero to do with race and 100% to do with environment, some of which is self created.
edit: I was wrong. You were going down the gun control path and not the ‘black people are evil’ path. My bad.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
If you google the teacher’s name, you learn that she is black, and that race is, or at least has become, part of this story.[/quote]
Her race is irrelevant - why hasn’t she been fired?[/quote]
Spend a month living in Detroit, Oakland, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington DC, New Orleans, Los Angeles, cities that all take turns being the MURDER CAPITAL of the U.S.
These cities all have one thing in common.[/quote]
They have more than one thing in common. But the two important things, while having nothing actually to do with the point I fear you are trying to make, are 1) horrid education systems which lead to awful economic conditions, and 2) a measurable lack of self respect, pride or sense of self worth beyond what name brand jeans they are wearing.
The problems in the cities you list have zero to do with race and 100% to do with environment, some of which is self created.
edit: I was wrong. You were going down the gun control path and not the ‘black people are evil’ path. My bad.[/quote]
You are partially correct.
View the videos and do the research and you will see on which part you are incorrect. There are surprisingly VERY FEW or NO videos of LARGE numbers of whites viciously attacking in the manner in which you will find the opposite.
This has nothing to do with the tough environment in which any are born into. It’s a lack of moral character. The United States went through a depression and African American families went through a very difficult civil rights period and the blacks did not break into homes or murder back then in the high rates that are occurring today. Today they are encouraged by the so called civil rights leaders to hate other races.
Contrary to popular belief there has been more black on white murder in the last 35 years than all the white lynchings and murder of blacks since the beginning of this country. Pull your own weight and do the research. The liberal media is hiding more than Obama’s failings.
And no matter what the excuse is…it is inexcusable and unforgivable. There is no other nation on the face of the earth that gives rise to more opportunity to every race and gender. If you cannot become a success in the country where Oprah became a billionaire and Obama became the president you cannot become successful anywhere.
I do not feel any less of a person because the Asians may best me at math or science. Nor do I lament the fact that I may not fly across the key and dunk a ball like Michael Jordan. We each have our weaknesses and our strengths with no CAUSE to murder or rob or assault others because we were brainwashed into believing we are OWED something.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
There are surprisingly VERY FEW or NO videos of LARGE numbers of whites viciously attacking in the manner in which you will find the opposite.[/quote]
Probably because the democrats didn’t have camera phones back in 1926… Otherwise I’m sure there would be plenty of video of lynchmobs and other such activity.
This statement is shortsighted at best, and flat out insane at worst.
If you don’t think environment plays into a person’s… Forget it, I’m not entertaining that statement as having any roots in reality.
Any civil rights movement that involved violence would have been suppressed and invalidated.
I’m not sure how you can even compare the struggle to move your people forward to their rightful place as equal in the eyes of the law, to living in horrid conditions (as relates to America) in 2012. The two situations aren’t even in the same ball park.
You have the burden of proof making a atatement like this. Until you can back this up, I’ll ignore it as untrue.
I agree, but there aren’t many other nations that are “melting pots”.
More likely a cultural difference than race based.
Statistical outlyer much? lol. There are white people better at basketball than you are too.
Also agree. But this type of bahavior has zero to do with someone’s race. To believe it is skin color that causes that type of behavior is flat out ignorant. Had black and white people switched skin color from the “dawn” of western society, white people would be doing the same if they were brainwashed. Human nature isn’t trumped by skin color.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
There are surprisingly VERY FEW or NO videos of LARGE numbers of whites viciously attacking in the manner in which you will find the opposite.[/quote]
Probably because the democrats didn’t have camera phones back in 1926… Otherwise I’m sure there would be plenty of video of lynchmobs and other such activity. - ****I never said these things didn’t happen in the past - but are you allowing what occurs today for something THAT none of us living today had no part IN?
This statement is shortsighted at best, and flat out insane at worst.
If you don’t think environment plays into a person’s… Forget it, I’m not entertaining that statement as having any roots in reality. ****(Environment does not matter in who we become. Morals matter. Otherwise who needs their children bused for 45 min to an hour so that their school desk sits next to a “diverse person.”)
Any civil rights movement that involved violence would have been suppressed and invalidated.
I’m not sure how you can even compare the struggle to move your people forward to their rightful place as equal in the eyes of the law, to living in horrid conditions (as relates to America) in 2012. The two situations aren’t even in the same ball park.
You have the burden of proof making a atatement like this. Until you can back this up, I’ll ignore it as untrue.
I agree, but there aren’t many other nations that are “melting pots”.
More likely a cultural difference than race based.
Statistical outlyer much? lol. There are white people better at basketball than you are too.
Also agree. But this type of bahavior has zero to do with someone’s race. To believe it is skin color that causes that type of behavior is flat out ignorant. Had black and white people switched skin color from the “dawn” of western society, white people would be doing the same if they were brainwashed. Human nature isn’t trumped by skin color.[/quote]
I knew from your first post where this would end.
The year is 2012 not 1840, 1926 or 1960. Did the conservative Republican party not welcome the first black congressman into it’s party? Did the conservative Republicans not help usher in the civil rights movement while Al Gore’s father and the Democrats voted in large numbers against it? Did we do this to allow them to grow in numbers and power to reach this point only to give them their revenge?
I’m not going to waste my time posting a thousand crime race related videos or pointing you to state police crime statistics which list crimes by race. They make up 18% of our society yet clearly commit half or more of the violent crimes. It won’t matter to you until it is on your doorstep. I’ve already experienced my personal awakening. Am I a racist? No but I’ve had my back door kicked in at midnight by someone with a record 4 pages in length.
There is no other culture or ethnic group that comes to America and faces the same burdens and fails at the epic rate that or blames everyone else for their problems. Nor do they rob steal and murder in the same numbers.
The Ku Klux Klan in their wildest imagination could not do to the “African Americans” what they have done to destroy themselves. By murder statistics one would come to the conclusion that blacks are racist against blacks. They kill each other in greater numbers than any other race.
The politically correct (white liberal guilt)force themselves to never consider any of what I write. It is alien. It is blasphemy. It is more important to the politically correct not to appear racist than to solve a problem. That is why we x-ray and pat down 88 year old white grandmothers at the airport.
We all know there have been no underwear bomb or shoe bomb attacks or hijacking of airlines flown into buildings by 88 year old white grandmothers but we have to show the world we aren’t racist. We have to give example that “human nature isn’t trumped by skin color!”
This country is not a melting pot today. We have never been more racially homogenized or segregated. You most likely do not attend church, but that is one of the spots where you will notice just how segregated we are. No government policy in place to force people to associate with others at church.
How about employment segregation? Mexican immigrants are employed overwhelmingly as gardeners and domestics, in apparel and furniture manufacturing, and as cooks and food preparers. African Americans work in government jobs, an important niche that is increasingly being challenged by the Hispanics who want in. Koreans open small businesses. Filipinos become nurses and medical technicians. Most Asians seem to have no interest in politics.
There is a difference between being informed instead of opinionated and I hope this will become apparent to you.
Environment does not matter in who we become. Morals matter. Otherwise who needs their children bused for 45 min to an hour so that their school desk sits next to a “diverse person.” Diverse person doesn’t mean Asian it means black.
Why does this generation of young blacks feel entitled to assault or murder at such a high rate all over the United States? These violent crimes are not isolated to one or two areas and we must find a solution or they are doomed to a short life or prison.
Today’s young black generation were neither part of slavery nor endured Jim Crow laws the same as I was not part of slavery nor had anything to do with passing Jim Crow laws. Also not blacks were slaves as well as some black OWNED black slaves. This is so simple. Political correctness corrupts all of that.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
There are surprisingly VERY FEW or NO videos of LARGE numbers of whites viciously attacking in the manner in which you will find the opposite.[/quote]
Probably because the democrats didn’t have camera phones back in 1926… Otherwise I’m sure there would be plenty of video of lynchmobs and other such activity.
This statement is shortsighted at best, and flat out insane at worst.
If you don’t think environment plays into a person’s… Forget it, I’m not entertaining that statement as having any roots in reality.
Any civil rights movement that involved violence would have been suppressed and invalidated.
I’m not sure how you can even compare the struggle to move your people forward to their rightful place as equal in the eyes of the law, to living in horrid conditions (as relates to America) in 2012. The two situations aren’t even in the same ball park.
You have the burden of proof making a atatement like this. Until you can back this up, I’ll ignore it as untrue.
I agree, but there aren’t many other nations that are “melting pots”.
More likely a cultural difference than race based.
Statistical outlyer much? lol. There are white people better at basketball than you are too.
Also agree. But this type of bahavior has zero to do with someone’s race. To believe it is skin color that causes that type of behavior is flat out ignorant. Had black and white people switched skin color from the “dawn” of western society, white people would be doing the same if they were brainwashed. Human nature isn’t trumped by skin color.[/quote]
Excellent post, Beans.
It is taken as a given in many liberal circles that Republicans are ipso facto racists. This piece, published yesterday, articulates that viewpoint with abandon:
It it complete bullshit and predicated on the faulty, idiotic logic that, because the former Confederacy is now a Republican stalwart, Republicanism must be synonymous with racism.
Every day I see smart conservatives demolish this stereotype, and your post here is a perfect example.
I wrote the post, my good friend Beans is arguing against it. I think that’s right. I’m tapping out on this subject. CountingBeans made good points.
Also if anyone has tried to private message me, my messaging is not working. Happy lifting.
[quote] Excellent post, Beans.
It is taken as a given in many liberal circles that Republicans are ipso facto racists. This piece, published yesterday, articulates that viewpoint with abandon:
It it complete bullshit and predicated on the faulty, idiotic logic that, because the former Confederacy is now a Republican stalwart, Republicanism must be synonymous with racism.
Every day I see smart conservatives demolish this stereotype, and your post here is a perfect example.[/quote]
[quote]Chushin wrote:
If you google the teacher’s name, you learn that she is black, and that race is, or at least has become, part of this story.[/quote]
Her race is irrelevant - why hasn’t she been fired?[/quote]
Spend a month living in Detroit, Oakland, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington DC, New Orleans, Los Angeles, cities that all take turns being the MURDER CAPITAL of the U.S.
These cities all have one thing in common.[/quote]
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Probably because the democrats didn’t have camera phones back in 1926… Otherwise I’m sure there would be plenty of video of lynchmobs and other such activity.[/quote]
Even if Democrats did have camera phones in 1926, I’m sure there would be no evidence as the Democrats made up the lynch mobs. Usually criminals aren’t dumb enough to produce evidence of their crimes, such is the purpose of the pointed white hoods they kept in their closets.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
I wrote the post, my good friend Beans is arguing against it. I think that’s right.
Also if anyone has tried to private message me, my messaging is not working. Happy lifting.
[quote] Excellent post, Beans.
It is taken as a given in many liberal circles that Republicans are ipso facto racists. This piece, published yesterday, articulates that viewpoint with abandon:
It it complete bullshit and predicated on the faulty, idiotic logic that, because the former Confederacy is now a Republican stalwart, Republicanism must be synonymous with racism.
Every day I see smart conservatives demolish this stereotype, and your post here is a perfect example.[/quote]
[/quote]
I’m not trying to insult you here, but I have to ask: you seem to be saying that blacks are genetically predisposed to violence, iniquity, and laziness. This is the only conclusion I can draw from your assertion that “this [crime] has nothing to do with the tough environment in which they are born into.” (As a side note, there is an Everest-sized mountain of research which says exactly the opposite).
You also seem to be implying that this genetic predisposition is either absent or far weaker in people of other races, namely whites.
Which carries the further implication that blacks are genetically inferior to whites.
Which is pretty much the textbook definition of actual, overt racism.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Probably because the democrats didn’t have camera phones back in 1926… Otherwise I’m sure there would be plenty of video of lynchmobs and other such activity.[/quote]
Even if Democrats did have camera phones in 1926, I’m sure there would be no evidence as the Democrats made up the lynch mobs. Usually criminals aren’t dumb enough to produce evidence of their crimes, such is the purpose of the pointed white hoods they kept in their closets.[/quote]
Doesn’t much matter if a jury of their peers refuses to recognize it as a crime in the first place. Emmett Till’s murderers were getting off, video evidence or not.
As a side note, the whole Democrats thing is pretty thin. If you think the political affiliations of past monsters should have bearing on our view of those political movements today, you should read up on the Nixon/Goldwater Southern Strategy. Because those lynchers and murderers were absorbed wholesale into the Republican Party.
The year is 2012 not 1840, 1926 or 1960. Did the conservative Republican party not welcome the first black congressman into it’s party? Did the conservative Republicans not help usher in the civil rights movement while Al Gore’s father and the Democrats voted in large numbers against it? Did we do this to allow them to grow in numbers and power to reach this point only to give them their revenge?[/quote]
I have posted more than once that I firmly believe the democrats keep race and charges of racism a main stay of their politcal strategy in order to mental oppress large sections of black people into voting for them…
I am fully aware of the role of the two parties in the treatment of black americans.
What % of Americans in poverty do they make up? Where are these crimes being committed? Why isn’t this getting as much coverage in the LIBERAL media as a shooting by a white dude in a movie theater?
I saw a white man spit in an asian woman’s face for driving slow. Does that make all white men road rage having bigots?
Look I’m sorry your house was invaded, I really am. But you are the only one bringing up if you are a racist or not here. (As of the time I posted this)
Coming to America being the key here.
But look, this again points more towards environment, lack of education and lack of leadership than it does skin color.
COuldn’t agree with you more. Look at abortion stats. SMH opened my eyes to those recently and I wanted to vomit.
I also blame the democrats here as well, but that is too long to get into.
Again, this is a result of basic human nature. The black community has shit leadership. Fucking Jay-Z rapping about selling drugs and what watches to buy has more influence than Thomas Sowell, who is by far one of the more intelligent people I’ve ever read. This is crazy.
A lack of leadership, which their “blaming others” for their problems is a obvious cry for help about, plays into this more than skin color.
Do blacks hate themselves? Only when they are republicans. But seriously, I don’t know, but I do know they don’t respect themselves, not in the same way other cultures do, at least in poverty stricken areas with shitty eduction. (Which again, is in part to their reaction to their environment.)
I think a look back through human history may put this in perspective for you. It isn’t a “black” issue, it is a human issue. Just because it is black people doing it in america doesn’t mean it is the skin color that is causing the issue.
[quote]The politically correct (white liberal guilt)force themselves to never consider any of what I write. It is alien. It is blasphemy. It is more important to the politically correct not to appear racist than to solve a problem. That is why we x-ray and pat down 88 year old white grandmothers at the airport.
We all know there have been no underwear bomb or shoe bomb attacks or hijacking of airlines flown into buildings by 88 year old white grandmothers but we have to show the world we aren’t racist. We have to give example that “human nature isn’t trumped by skin color!”[/quote]
This is why America is great. We don’t take away the rights of any certain group anymore, we now take the rights away from everyone.
And I think “showing the world we aren’t racist” would be a good thing. We are exceptional, we are great, we hold ourselves to a higher standard. And as long as people believe skin color above environment causes people to act in a certain way, we will have to continue to do as such.
I would argue we are segregated more along class/income lines in 2012, but…
Last time I was in a church outside of a wedding, their were both black and white people there, handful of south east asians as well…
This one is too easy, lol. Come on, plays into my stance directly.
I’m not insulted that you assume I wasn’t either of those two things. ALthough I think your opinions bleed into your informed a bit, I don’tthink you aren’t informed.
No offense, but I feel sorry for you if you believe this. I really do. You need to read more, start with history books that go back further than 1980… Maybe even BC.
Yes, and they come largely from your environment.
Living around Boston, I can tell you their isn’t a damn person who thinks busing worked out for the better.
For the same reason they feel entitled to kill other black, hispanics or asians… I’ve talked about it a lot the last two posts.
Agree. Again, I’m partial to the notion that some current democratic social policies enslave balcks in a different way. And you feed right into it, all while screaming as loud as you can you hate them. It is astonishing how good the democrats are at this.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
As a side note, the whole Democrats thing is pretty thin. If you think the political affiliations of past monsters should have bearing on our view of those political movements today, you should read up on the Nixon/Goldwater Southern Strategy. Because those lynchers and murderers were absorbed wholesale into the Republican Party.[/quote]
Most of those people from both parties are dead or real close to it at thsi point anyway.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
As a side note, the whole Democrats thing is pretty thin. If you think the political affiliations of past monsters should have bearing on our view of those political movements today, you should read up on the Nixon/Goldwater Southern Strategy. Because those lynchers and murderers were absorbed wholesale into the Republican Party.[/quote]
Most of those people from both parties are dead or real close to it at thsi point anyway.[/quote]
Agreed. As I said, I think the “Republicans are racist” thing is just false as a generality.
I’m just pointing out that the “Democrats were racist once” argument is similar in that it does nothing to exalt or diminish either political party today.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
As a side note, the whole Democrats thing is pretty thin. If you think the political affiliations of past monsters should have bearing on our view of those political movements today, you should read up on the Nixon/Goldwater Southern Strategy. Because those lynchers and murderers were absorbed wholesale into the Republican Party.[/quote]
Most of those people from both parties are dead or real close to it at thsi point anyway.[/quote]
Agreed. As I said, I think the “Republicans are racist” thing is just false as a generality.
I’m just pointing out that the “Democrats were racist once” argument is similar in that it does nothing to exalt or diminish either political party today.[/quote]
Agree, but it really riles up young liberals, so it is fun to say, lol
[quote]smh23 wrote:
As a side note, the whole Democrats thing is pretty thin. If you think the political affiliations of past monsters should have bearing on our view of those political movements today, you should read up on the Nixon/Goldwater Southern Strategy. Because those lynchers and murderers were absorbed wholesale into the Republican Party.[/quote]
Most of those people from both parties are dead or real close to it at thsi point anyway.[/quote]
Agreed. As I said, I think the “Republicans are racist” thing is just false as a generality.
I’m just pointing out that the “Democrats were racist once” argument is similar in that it does nothing to exalt or diminish either political party today.[/quote]
Agree, but it really riles up young liberals, so it is fun to say, lol[/quote]
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
I wrote the post, my good friend Beans is arguing against it. I think that’s right.
Also if anyone has tried to private message me, my messaging is not working. Happy lifting.
[quote] Excellent post, Beans.
It is taken as a given in many liberal circles that Republicans are ipso facto racists. This piece, published yesterday, articulates that viewpoint with abandon:
It it complete bullshit and predicated on the faulty, idiotic logic that, because the former Confederacy is now a Republican stalwart, Republicanism must be synonymous with racism.
Every day I see smart conservatives demolish this stereotype, and your post here is a perfect example.[/quote]
[/quote]
I’m not trying to insult you here, but I have to ask: you seem to be saying that blacks are genetically predisposed to violence, iniquity, and laziness. This is the only conclusion I can draw from your assertion that “this [crime] has nothing to do with the tough environment in which they are born into.” (As a side note, there is an Everest-sized mountain of research which says exactly the opposite).
You also seem to be implying that this genetic predisposition is either absent or far weaker in people of other races, namely whites.
Which carries the further implication that blacks are genetically inferior to whites.
Which is pretty much the textbook definition of actual, overt racism.
Correct me if I’m wrong at any point here.[/quote]
I might be seriously mistaken here but I don’t think that’s what he is arguing, I think he just really wrote it poorly. Witness a few statements in his past posts talking about the different negative change from MLK Jr and the civil rights movement to today’s “thug” culture (“change” being that MLK’s days were civilized protest and an emphasis on achieving equality and greatness through hard work–where now he views the culture as being entitled and lazy, if I am reading him correctly). A real racist would have said something more along the lines of “see, we shouldn’t have given them equal rights, look what they are doing with it”.
In addition there was a sentence in one of his last posts that said something like “The KKK in all their imagination could never have done as much to destry the african-american community as they themselves have managed to do”. To imply recent self-destruction is to imply that there was something of internal and integral value to be destroyed at some point in the past–also something I don’t think an actual racist would agree with (because a racist as you said views a race of people as genetically inferior).
I dunno, but I seem to read a guy taking a hard line “personal responsibility” argument while ignoring environmental factors leading to widespread crime rather than a racist.
I could be completely wrong. I think time will tell.
I might be seriously mistaken here but I don’t think that’s what he is arguing, I think he just really wrote it poorly. Witness a few statements in his past posts talking about the different negative change from MLK Jr and the civil rights movement to today’s “thug” culture (“change” being that MLK’s days were civilized protest and an emphasis on achieving equality and greatness through hard work–where now he views the culture as being entitled and lazy, if I am reading him correctly). A real racist would have said something more along the lines of “see, we shouldn’t have given them equal rights, look what they are doing with it”.[/quote] You would have to admit your racist first to say something that blunt. That doesn’t mean your not racist just means you’re beating around the bush.
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
I wrote the post, my good friend Beans is arguing against it. I think that’s right.
Also if anyone has tried to private message me, my messaging is not working. Happy lifting.
[quote] Excellent post, Beans.
It is taken as a given in many liberal circles that Republicans are ipso facto racists. This piece, published yesterday, articulates that viewpoint with abandon:
It it complete bullshit and predicated on the faulty, idiotic logic that, because the former Confederacy is now a Republican stalwart, Republicanism must be synonymous with racism.
Every day I see smart conservatives demolish this stereotype, and your post here is a perfect example.[/quote]
[/quote]
I’m not trying to insult you here, but I have to ask: you seem to be saying that blacks are genetically predisposed to violence, iniquity, and laziness. This is the only conclusion I can draw from your assertion that “this [crime] has nothing to do with the tough environment in which they are born into.” (As a side note, there is an Everest-sized mountain of research which says exactly the opposite).
You also seem to be implying that this genetic predisposition is either absent or far weaker in people of other races, namely whites.
Which carries the further implication that blacks are genetically inferior to whites.
Which is pretty much the textbook definition of actual, overt racism.
Correct me if I’m wrong at any point here.[/quote]
I might be seriously mistaken here but I don’t think that’s what he is arguing, I think he just really wrote it poorly. Witness a few statements in his past posts talking about the different negative change from MLK Jr and the civil rights movement to today’s “thug” culture (“change” being that MLK’s days were civilized protest and an emphasis on achieving equality and greatness through hard work–where now he views the culture as being entitled and lazy, if I am reading him correctly). A real racist would have said something more along the lines of “see, we shouldn’t have given them equal rights, look what they are doing with it”.
In addition there was a sentence in one of his last posts that said something like “The KKK in all their imagination could never have done as much to destry the african-american community as they themselves have managed to do”. To imply recent self-destruction is to imply that there was something of internal and integral value to be destroyed at some point in the past–also something I don’t think an actual racist would agree with (because a racist as you said views a race of people as genetically inferior).
I dunno, but I seem to read a guy taking a hard line “personal responsibility” argument while ignoring environmental factors leading to widespread crime rather than a racist.
I could be completely wrong. I think time will tell.
[/quote]
You could be right, I haven’t read through his other posts in this thread so I don’t have the basis (or the desire) to accuse him or anybody else around here of racism.
That said, the section I quoted came across as an articulation of a deeply racist belief, and I am genuinely curious if Conservativedog agrees with me or if I have misread him.
If the logical steps I provided turn out to be an accurate representation of his beliefs–blacks commit a disproportionately large chunk of domestic crimes, environment and circumstance do not explain this fact, therefor blacks have inborn criminal tendencies, therefor blacks are genetically inferior to whites–then he is, by his own admission, a white supremacist.
Again, I could be (and hope that I am) entirely wrong.
