[quote]derek wrote:
I would bang her then read her books and bang her again (only harder). She an ENTERTAINER duh! (and she’s hot) but then again I think Amber Frey is incredibly sexy![/quote]
Amber Frey… Ann Coulter… Derek, you must like your women on the skeletal side?
Brother Elk wrote:
“Limbic, I hope you are compiling that proof for jeffy. You know how little jeffy gets when he doesn’t get his way!”
I hope he is too!!! I’d be pleasantly surprised.
Oh, the adjectives need some refining.
“Little?”
Thanks!!!
JeffR
Okay, Okay, jeffy, very little. Now is that better?
Brother Elk,
Getting colder.
Other direction.
I find myself always redirecting you.
That will be four dollars.
Thanks!!!
JeffR
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
If you find yourseld getting riled up over what Coulter says or does, she’s winning.
Coulter pushes buttons. She sells books. Outside of respective physical attractiveness, there is little substantive difference in her political attitude and Michael Moore’s - though to be accurate, Coulter is a polemicist, not a pathological liar or propagandist. The main difference is Coulter finds herself at the fringe edges of the Right and Moore has been beatified as a savior and a champion by the Left.
Fringe personalities belong at the fringe, and that’s where Coulter is. She doesn’t get to sit in a box next to ex-Presidents at the Republican National Convention.
Coulter is a radical, not a conservative. Not long before her 15 minutes is up.[/quote]
Precisely.
Nah jeffy, I think I will spend that four dollars on some french fries, or french toast, or maybe some french bread. Yeah, a much better investment!
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Ken Kaniff wrote:
"@ChemicalD
This attidude is exactly the problem of america and exactly what bush wants.
Well, both Hitler and Bush knew how to use patriotism to make good natured people fight for them."
What a wonderful post!!!
Full of understanding!!!
Ok, your post sucked.
First of all, let me introduce you to the concept of SARCASM. Anyone who has grade two or above reading skills should have been able to decipher ChemID’s post with little difficulty.
Second, the comparisons between Bush and Hitler is WAY OUT OF LINE. I smile when I think about your pain on November 3rd, 2004. I have a sentence for you to remember, “Four more years.”
Thanks for your terrific post!!! (Sarcasm).
JeffR[/quote]
Thanks for ‘dechiphering’ my post. Obviously, I should have added a “!” after “dumb bitch”, just to clarify 
[quote]Elkhntr1 wrote:
derek wrote:
I would bang her then read her books and bang her again (only harder). She an ENTERTAINER duh! (and she’s hot) but then again I think Amber Frey is incredibly sexy!
Amber Frey… Ann Coulter… Derek, you must like your women on the skeletal side?
[/quote]
Better than fat chicks I guess!
I find it quite telling that there is no one here from the right defending Ms. Coulter. She’s a fringe player with little, if any, capital to spend in the Repub. party.
Contrast that with the left’s MMoore worship around F9/11. Does JTF have any conspiracy theory websites/articles that would inplicate Moore? Of course not.
The right seems to know a kook when they see one - regardless of party affiliation. The left? - well…not so much.
http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/./1/.1105014974067.ann_al.jpg
How long you suppose they’ve been dating? : o
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Contrast that with the left’s MMoore worship around F9/11. Does JTF have any conspiracy theory websites/articles that would inplicate Moore? Of course not. [/quote]
While I’m not a big fan of MM, F9/11 is not the lie fest the right made it out to be. Unless you mean the doctored footage to make it look like Bush just sat in the classroom for 20 min…oh, wait bad example. Oh yeah, the Saudi flights…what a pack of li…oh right, confirmed by the 911 Commission.
Including this one:
TIA now verifies flight of Saudis
By Jean Heller, Times Staff Writer
Published June 9, 2004
Two days after the Sept. 11 attacks, with most of the nation’s air traffic still grounded, a small jet landed at Tampa International Airport, picked up three young Saudi men and left.
The men, one of them thought to be a member of the Saudi royal family, were accompanied by a former FBI agent and a former Tampa police officer on the flight to Lexington, Ky.
The Saudis then took another flight out of the country. The two ex-officers returned to TIA a few hours later on the same plane.
For nearly three years, White House, aviation and law enforcement officials have insisted the flight never took place and have denied published reports and widespread Internet speculation about its purpose.
But now, at the request of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks, TIA officials have confirmed that the flight did take place and have supplied details.
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/06/09/Tampabay/TIA_now_verifies_flig.shtml
You do know O’ Reilly’s on your side?
rainjack,
I wish we lived in the day that I could challenge you to a duel. ; )
[quote]
rainjack,
I wish we lived in the day that I could challenge you to a duel. ; )[/quote]
OMG, Zell! What was he thinking? Would he really shoot the guy in the duel?
A duel! Funniest…line…EVER!
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
You do know O’ Reilly’s on your side?
rainjack,
I wish we lived in the day that I could challenge you to a duel. ; )[/quote]
When it’s convenient for him, he’s on ‘my side’. Other times he’s more pre-occupied with making dirty phone calls, and getting off.
But nonetheless - are you implying that O’Reilly is somehow Moore-ish? Or worse than Moore? Is that what you’re saying? Cause if that’s your position - you’ve lost just about all your remaining credibility - at least with me. As if that matters.
O’Reilly is just willfully ignorant, as a opposed to Moore who simply invents “reality” as he goes along.
People like these fringe personalities because they “stick it to the man” (whoever you happen to think “the man” is) and because they have the guts or temerity to say our own most vile, thanatos inspired inner impulses, rather than our rational deliberations. There is something intensely satisfying about someone wholeheartedly and passionately agreeing with a prejudice or instinct, rather than with a rational thought, well-worked out.
All of the above are ignorant, thier listeners are even worse.
I would bang Ann Coutler and Amber Frey, together, at the same time, no rubber.
JusttheFacts,
Have you ever heard the story of the “Tortise and the Hare?”
Slow and steady. Make the right moves after deliberation.
Not running out of the room with arms flailing.
Remember the aspirin factory being bombed in Sudan by your pal Billy?
That’s what happens when you use knee-jerk reactions to complex problems.
So shitcan the “Seven minutes” horseshit.
It means less than nothing.
Four more years!!!
JeffR
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Other times he’s more pre-occupied with making dirty phone calls, and getting off.[/quote]
Oh oh, maybe I’m more like O’ Reilly than I thought.
No, I’m not comparing O’ Reilly to Moore, you just said you would recognize a kook when you saw one.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
JusttheFacts,
Have you ever heard the story of the “Tortise and the Hare?”
Slow and steady. Make the right moves after deliberation.
Not running out of the room with arms flailing.
Remember the aspirin factory being bombed in Sudan by your pal Billy?
That’s what happens when you use knee-jerk reactions to complex problems.
So shitcan the “Seven minutes” horseshit.
It means less than nothing.
Four more years!!!
JeffR[/quote]
[quote]JeffR wrote:
JusttheFacts,
Have you ever heard the story of the “Tortise and the Hare?”
Slow and steady. Make the right moves after deliberation.
Not running out of the room with arms flailing.
Remember the aspirin factory being bombed in Sudan by your pal Billy?
That’s what happens when you use knee-jerk reactions to complex problems.
So shitcan the “Seven minutes” horseshit.
It means less than nothing.
Four more years!!!
JeffR[/quote]
Apparently you underestimated the genius of Billy.
Bomb the asprin factory, wait for the opposition to succomb to excutiating headaches, then move in for the kill…it was the perfect plan until you guys got impatient - so now you see what’s happening today, “W” didn’t take out the asprin factory beforehand, the insurgents still have asprin and we’re getting nowhere.
As far as the “seven minutes” horseshit, probably the only good excuse “W” could have had for not reacting immediately would have been if HE was getting a blow-job at the time…LOL
Sir, the country is under attack! Please, I don’t want to scare the kids…it can wait till we’re finished reading. You wanna bet there was no camera there when he got news of the tsunami? I’d hate to have to sit through a 48 HOUR silent movie.
[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
If you find yourseld getting riled up over what Coulter says or does, she’s winning.
Coulter pushes buttons. She sells books. Outside of respective physical attractiveness, there is little substantive difference in her political attitude and Michael Moore’s - though to be accurate, Coulter is a polemicist, not a pathological liar or propagandist. The main difference is Coulter finds herself at the fringe edges of the Right and Moore has been beatified as a savior and a champion by the Left.
Fringe personalities belong at the fringe, and that’s where Coulter is. She doesn’t get to sit in a box next to ex-Presidents at the Republican National Convention.
Coulter is a radical, not a conservative. Not long before her 15 minutes is up.
Precisely.[/quote]
Precisely wrong. & wishful thinking on your parts, BostonBarrister and thunderbolt23.
Coulter has become increasingly mainstream–positioning herself very successfully as voice of the Right.
You can find her increasingly quoted in media discussions, her books in any Barnes & Noble or Borders in the USA. You can find her in the “Conservative Calendar Girls” along with Condi Rice. http://www.cblpolicyinstitute.org/
In fact, not only is the line between Coulter and Rice becoming blurred, but no intellectuals on the Right have the balls to do anything about it.
Try this: change Arabs to Jews in Coulter’s quote and then try it out. Just pushing buttons? Just entertainment? Just harmless fun? Change it to Africans. Keep going.
Coulter is an example of how too many on the Right in America reward hate speech. That’s right: hate speech. Pure and simple. But you won’t face that. What are you really ashamed of or afraid of? Tell me.
& as for Michael Moore–you’ve got that backwards as well.
His Bowling for Columbine was taken seriously. F-911 established him as a grandiose goof who doesn’t know his own BS from reality. His pre-election Slacker tour: a total bust. So where are these worshippers and admirers?
But let’s stay with Coulter / Moore comparison for now anyway. Explain to me how the consequences of Moore’s nonsense in anyway compares to Coulter’s. Coulter consistently writes checks to be cashed on behalf of the USA against what she imagines are the enimies of conservatism. Moore is not the same–he’s always offering *his viewpoint, flawed as it obviously is. No imperial “we” and “our” in Moore.
Face it: Coulter is political porn for conservatives but porn is now mainsteam. Don’t Peewee Herman it: owe up to your guilty pleasures. After all, when you’ve been whacking off in public for all to see, no point in blaming it on a non-existent liberal media.
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
No, I’m not comparing O’ Reilly to Moore, you just said you would recognize a kook when you saw one.[/quote]
Much to the chagrin of those that want to paint me and others around here as kool-aid sippers - I think I am, at the very least, capable of spotting a kook when I encounter one.
Yowser -
You, my friend, are certifiable.
By whose standard is Condi and Ms. Coulter indistinguishable from one another?
Who are young conservative women supposed to emulate? Helen Gurly Brown? The NOW Gang? Dikes on Bikes?
You are an idiot.