[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It’s NOT pee. (although sometimes a chick will pee and call it squirting, legitimate squirting is definitely not pee)
Another interesting note is that I’ve found that MOST women will squirt under the right circumstances.[/quote]
Its pee[/quote]
So you are saying most women will pee under the right circumstances?
My wife squirts a little if I tickle her sometimes.
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It’s NOT pee. (although sometimes a chick will pee and call it squirting, legitimate squirting is definitely not pee)
Another interesting note is that I’ve found that MOST women will squirt under the right circumstances.[/quote]
Its pee[/quote]
So you are saying most women will pee under the right circumstances?
My wife squirts a little if I tickle her sometimes.
[/quote]
My understanding is this becomes an issue after they give the birth to the babies.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It’s NOT pee. (although sometimes a chick will pee and call it squirting, legitimate squirting is definitely not pee)
Another interesting note is that I’ve found that MOST women will squirt under the right circumstances.[/quote]
Its pee[/quote]
So you are saying most women will pee under the right circumstances?
My wife squirts a little if I tickle her sometimes.
[/quote]
My understanding is this becomes an issue after they give the birth to the babies. [/quote]
Where would a fluid of that consistency and amount come from? There is nothing in the female anatomy that stores that amount OTHER than the bladder. This is not about how many women you made squirt this is basic anatomy and bodily function.
Its pee
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It’s NOT pee. (although sometimes a chick will pee and call it squirting, legitimate squirting is definitely not pee)
Another interesting note is that I’ve found that MOST women will squirt under the right circumstances.[/quote]
Its pee[/quote]
So you are saying most women will pee under the right circumstances?
My wife squirts a little if I tickle her sometimes.
[/quote]
My understanding is this becomes an issue after they give the birth to the babies. [/quote]
Where would a fluid of that consistency and amount come from? There is nothing in the female anatomy that stores that amount OTHER than the bladder. This is not about how many women you made squirt this is basic anatomy and bodily function.
Its pee[/quote]
no, no. I’m say, women tend to lose a little bladder control after they give the births, hence why Ray’s wife might pee a little when he tickles her.
I already assumed you were right about the “squirting” thing like two pages ago.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
It’s NOT pee. (although sometimes a chick will pee and call it squirting, legitimate squirting is definitely not pee)
Another interesting note is that I’ve found that MOST women will squirt under the right circumstances.[/quote]
Its pee[/quote]
So you are saying most women will pee under the right circumstances?
My wife squirts a little if I tickle her sometimes.
[/quote]
My understanding is this becomes an issue after they give the birth to the babies. [/quote]
Where would a fluid of that consistency and amount come from? There is nothing in the female anatomy that stores that amount OTHER than the bladder. This is not about how many women you made squirt this is basic anatomy and bodily function.
Its pee[/quote]
no, no. I’m say, women tend to lose a little bladder control after they give the births, hence why Ray’s wife might pee a little when he tickles her.
I already assumed you were right about the “squirting” thing like two pages ago. [/quote]
That was for AC Beans.
Who else here has inserted a foley catheter into a womens bladder?
Show of hands?
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Who else here has inserted a foley catheter into a womens bladder?
Show of hands?
[/quote]
Does watching it happen during childbirth count?
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
That was for AC Beans.
Who else here has inserted a foley catheter into a womens bladder?
Show of hands?
[/quote]
why is this not in the dating disasters thread?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Who else here has inserted a foley catheter into a womens bladder?
Show of hands?
[/quote]
Does watching it happen during childbirth count?[/quote]
Nope…
Its all about the touch and feel.
The female urethra is very, very short.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
A year or 2 ago, I attempted to figure out the answer to the OP’s question.
What I basically found out was that it is an unknown substance with an unknown purpose.
I got nothing…
Oddly enough, I’ve only been with one squirter. I hope it isn’t pee, otherwise she pissed all over the back seat of my car a couple months ago… a lot. Like excessive amounts. It wasn’t a turn-off, just peculiar…[/quote]
Bet it smelled wonderful in the summer heat too. [/quote]
I don’t recall actually smelling anything.
Also something to note, she really had to take a piss afterward, which would work against the concept that it is pee. If she squirted so much, how did she still have to go so bad afterward?
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
A year or 2 ago, I attempted to figure out the answer to the OP’s question.
I
What I basically found out was that it is an unknown substance with an unknown purpose.
I got nothing…
Oddly enough, I’ve only been with one squirter. I hope it isn’t pee, otherwise she pissed all over the back seat of my car a couple months ago… a lot. Like excessive amounts. It wasn’t a turn-off, just peculiar…[/quote]
Bet it smelled wonderful in the summer heat too. [/quote]
I don’t recall actually smelling anything.
Also something to note, she really had to take a piss afterward, which would work against the concept that it is pee. If she squirted so much, how did she still have to go so bad afterward?[/quote]
She had that burning sensation when “she” “pinched it off”.
[quote]clinton131 wrote:
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]TDub301 wrote:
A year or 2 ago, I attempted to figure out the answer to the OP’s question.
I
What I basically found out was that it is an unknown substance with an unknown purpose.
I got nothing…
Oddly enough, I’ve only been with one squirter. I hope it isn’t pee, otherwise she pissed all over the back seat of my car a couple months ago… a lot. Like excessive amounts. It wasn’t a turn-off, just peculiar…[/quote]
Bet it smelled wonderful in the summer heat too. [/quote]
I don’t recall actually smelling anything.
Also something to note, she really had to take a piss afterward, which would work against the concept that it is pee. If she squirted so much, how did she still have to go so bad afterward?[/quote]
She had that burning sensation when “she” “pinched it off”.[/quote]
That is just run of the mill gonorrhea.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Technically, it’s a published science journal.
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Technically, it’s a published science journal.
[/quote]
n=2 in their study. Lots of power!
[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Technically, it’s a published science journal.
[/quote]
n=2 in their study. Lots of power!
[/quote]
lol wow the ends people will go to deny they got peed on
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Technically, it’s a published science journal.
[/quote]
n=2 in their study. Lots of power!
[/quote]
lol wow the ends people will go to deny they got peed on[/quote]
I think that is the direction of most research on the subject. Of course, no researcher would ever design a study to reach a biased conclusion? 
[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]2busy wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
Derek, while I lean toward trusting your word and experience, I seem to recall someone once posting a chem analysis that showed different components than urine.
This was quite a while back. Perhaps it was Push (who else?).[/quote]
This is just proof you can find stuff on the internet to argue anything you want. ^ Not exactly the NewEngland Journal of Medicine.[/quote]
Technically, it’s a published science journal.
[/quote]
n=2 in their study. Lots of power!
[/quote]
lol wow the ends people will go to deny they got peed on[/quote]
I think that is the direction of most research on the subject. Of course, no researcher would ever design a study to reach a biased conclusion?
[/quote]
Well, I was peed on, not that I asked for it, but before a woman squirts, given that you induce that with stimulating her G-spot, which apparently is not verifiable either, her vajayjay clams shut, her inner vajayjay balloons and then you have to change your sheets.
Which is entirely unlike being peed on, except for the changing your sheets.
So, what you do is this.
You locate the G-spot.
That is a rough, bumpy area just about a fingers lenght inside of her.
Read about the come hither motion?
Forget that shit, fuck her with your fingers, gently at first.
That area will harden and feel even rougher and bumpier.
Now, finger fuck her in earnest, keep your fingers slightly crooked so that your fingertips violate that exact same spot.
She might protest that it is too much, she might claim that she needs to pee, ignore that.
Before too long, cumming, clamping down, squirting, ballooning.
Change your sheets.