[quote]pittbulll wrote:
orion wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
orion wrote:
pittbulll wrote:
tom63 wrote:
John S. wrote:
My dad came from a family where my Grandma was stay at home and my grandpa worked in a factory, they where upper poor-lower middle class. He worked hard at school and became a doctor.
My mom came from a white trash family down in Texas. She did well in school then met my dad became a stay at home mom. I have 4 siblings. After my dad died my mom took on a full time job and went to school and became a RN.
In this country if you really want to pull yourself up you can.
Exactly,
I am middle to upper middle class, not rich, but doing better than my parents who are now retired, but doing better than when I was a kid. Middle class you might say.
I here tales of woe every day. It usually amounts to stupid decisions in relationships, school work, working or lack of, taking drugs, etc. The poor are not on a higher moral plain. In fact I argue we don’t have poor anymore.
Standing in line for free food, texting on your phone. Defrauding welfare while dressing better than the workers in the welfare office. It’s a load of crap.
People like you and your parents are better. My kids nad me are better. Not by God’s grace, but by the willingness to take personal responsibility for our own lives.
I have to go back to physics, not everybody can be on top, and you need people below to build on. . If some one rises some one has to sink it is a law of nature. We can all build a better society collectively, but we can not all be top dog,
Fallacy, because the rising tide lifts all boats.
Consequently even the people who are considered to be poor in Europe or the US are rich compared to billions of people.
All those people could be better off without taking anything away from someone else.
I agree with you our Society is collectively better than most of the world, though it could be allot better, As a side note I think the social programs are what makes America better than the third world Nations, You have free markets alive and well in Viet Nam, India, China, The places where the free market can not survive is where there are no social programs (like a functioning GOV.)
Yes it could be a lot better.
The problem is that any kind of redistribution just leads to a suboptimal allocation of capital, i.e. the economy grows slower.
Any pain you may relieve now with other peoples money will be repaid later by someone else, plus interest.
I know the rich pay a higher percentage of Income tax, but if you add up all the fees, taxes, (sales, income, gas, cable, telephone, electric, environmental) the poor are paying a higher ( percentage ) than the wealthy, I know it is another thread but I would go for a flat tax if they did away with all other taxes and fees.[/quote]
Ugh,no. Fees are fees. We don’t pay more for various consumption because we should not charge people more or less for the same services. I do realize there are kid and senior movie discounts. I do know that we all pay the same at the pump, but it’s the same for the same service.
It’s fair, because you pay for the gas you buy, your movie ticket, your concert ticket and so on.