[quote]pushharder wrote:
With shit like this going down only a fool would bet against the state forcing churches to marry gays someday 'fore too long:
First they will lose their tax exempt status:
Then they, churches, will be like the baker.[/quote]
It’s only a matter of time. The progressive social agenda has very little to do with equal rights and more to do about their own hegemony in society.
I support the legal rights of gay couples, but im not jumping on the bandwagon of gay pride.
[quote]PonyWhisperer wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
It’s ballsy to conform, huh Pony? Really?[/quote]
Push,
Is it really conforming? I’m sure a lot of people chose not to “conform” when Galileo pointed out that we are not the center of the universe. The flat earth society still exists, they did not “conform” either. Being stupid and wrong is not noble, it isn’t you drawing a line in the sand, it’s just willful ignorance. If choosing stupid is “ballsy” you my friend are going to need much bigger pants.
[/quote]
That is not what happened.
As far as the evidence went at that time nothing pointed to him being right, it was actually the CC who stood on firm empirical ground.
Second, he got house arrest for suggesting that the whole Bible needed to be reinterpreted and for making fun of the pope and for being tremendously dangerous as a whole.
The religious wars in Germany were a catastrophe and here this shitlord is attacking religious doctrine without evidence to back it up.
Compare that to the present where the president of Harvard got canned for suggesting that on an elite level mens brains might be better suited for math then womens.
He was not debated, there was no gaggle of Jesuits thoroughly examining his evidence, there was no danger of bloody civil war and he got silenced quickly nonetheless.
Ponywhisperer,
Dont know if you were serious or not, but i once saw a female dog hump my leg, then my wife’s leg and then a table leg. They are animals. They are in heat. It doesnt say they prefer male, female, or wood. They just want to have sex. Oh and buy the way i just read an article about a polygamist out west who registered for a marriage license to marry a second wife. The officials said they have to consult with the higher ups. It has already started.
Stoicwarrior: is that mother****in DRIZZT in your avi??
killerDIRK
The Bible states in Gen 5:4 that adam and eve had sons and daughters. From what i can research, God allowed sex between siblings just for the purpose to populate the earth. Later in Leviticus 18:6-18 He imposed new laws against sex between family members.
I thought i explained why someone would choose or fall into being attracted to the same sex. Because of your depraved and sinful heart. You dont have to answer, but are you saved. If not you dont see your lifestyle as sinful. But if you ever feel convicted or open your heart up to the Lord, you will see how sinful it is. Dont think im attacking you. I treat all people the same. Im no bette then you as we are all sinners like i said. Sorry to get all preachy.
[quote]Coltman wrote:
Thank you for the article.
There are many “muscle bulls” in my gym.
Some make gay slurs, but most don’t. The irony here is that these guys are same gender attracted. And wouldn’t hesitate a tryst with another well built guy.
You’re so right about the overcompensating.[/quote]
Shugart can shove his article right up his ass. He decided to invent a problem where one did not exist.
10-04 nighthawkz. Not a fan? I read the books for almost 20 years. Its been a little while since i read one though
I have been a long time lurker of T-Nation and enjoy the articles and also all the talk on the community boards and have learned a great deal from everyone here. I felt compelled to reply in this thread because I do not find it right that on a TRAINING website, the editors allowed Chris Shugart to write an article COMPLETLEY UNRELATED to training. This article offers no education, and no insight for what this website is supposed to be about. If he wanted to stir up emotions and post HIS OWN OPINION, then that should have been a thread in an appropriate sub-forum.
[quote]CAMNORTH wrote:
I have been a long time lurker of T-Nation and enjoy the articles and also all the talk on the community boards and have learned a great deal from everyone here. I felt compelled to reply in this thread because I do not find it right that on a TRAINING website, the editors allowed Chris Shugart to write an article COMPLETLEY UNRELATED to training. This article offers no education, and no insight for what this website is supposed to be about. If he wanted to stir up emotions and post HIS OWN OPINION, then that should have been a thread in an appropriate sub-forum. [/quote]
I agree.
We have a forum to express all that shit. It’s called PWI. This was helpful to no one, save to stir some self-loathing in people who don’t deserve it. We come from all walks of life. And if you lift you are welcome. He basically, despite his feeble attempts to exclude the very few “enlightened” and shoved rest of us in a ‘bigot’ category. Like I said, he should make it a very little ball and shove it up his ass.
I have never seen gay bashing on this site.
Some guys have come out as gay and the general consensus was, whatever dude, enjoy the cock…
Whatelse iz we supposed to do?
To me, serial philanderers and people who repeatedly marry and divorce are a much greater blasphemy of the marital institution than a loving gay couple.
I just don’t understand all the opposition and fear. And I’m glad that I don’t.
And I’ll step up and say I could care less if polygamy (between consenting adults) became legal. As long as the financial means is there to support that type of marital structure and the ensuing children.
Whether gays and polygamists and serial divorcees are allowed to marry has no affect on my commitment to or relationship with my husband.
[quote]kpsnap wrote:
To me, serial philanderers and people who repeatedly marry and divorce are a much greater blasphemy of the marital institution than a loving gay couple.
I just don’t understand all the opposition and fear. And I’m glad that I don’t.
And I’ll step up and say I could care less if polygamy (between consenting adults) became legal. As long as the financial means is there to support that type of marital structure and the ensuing children.
Whether gays and polygamists and serial divorcees are allowed to marry has no affect on my commitment to or relationship with my husband. [/quote]
Amen Kpsnap.
Gay marriage is legal and it’s going to stay. Everyone might as well just get used to the new reality. Please do it soon so we can all get on with our lives and stop having to listen to the constant list of LGBT issues with fucking wedding cakes and whatever stupid bullshit gets everyone’s knickers in a twist.
[quote]kpsnap wrote:
To me, serial philanderers and people who repeatedly marry and divorce are a much greater blasphemy of the marital institution than a loving gay couple.
I just don’t understand all the opposition and fear. And I’m glad that I don’t.
And I’ll step up and say I could care less if polygamy (between consenting adults) became legal. As long as the financial means is there to support that type of marital structure and the ensuing children.
Whether gays and polygamists and serial divorcees are allowed to marry has no affect on my commitment to or relationship with my husband. [/quote]
+1 If your marriage is devalued because homosexuals can marry, your marriage was shit to begin with.
this should clear up any confusion