Should the Police Chase Suspects?

[quote]Gregus wrote:
lanchefan1 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.

How do you determine the 1%?

Chasing for things like this:

  1. Known murder suspect or murderer.
  2. Known rapist/ molester
  3. Either above being seen fleeing a crime scene

Things like that. Even bank robbers should be tracked and not chased.

Why?

Because i don’t want anyone dieing because of Money. Like running because you’re stupid and don’t want to get in trouble and arrested for warrants for unpaid tickets or something. It’s just not worth it to die over things like that. Even for the Cops not to mention civilians and our kids.

[/quote]

This is great… in hindsight. Most often times this isn’t discovered until after the fact that the person driving the stolen vehicle is guilty of “other” crimes or just stupid warrants because they didn’t go to court on a damn speeding ticket or DUI charge.

[quote]Gregus wrote:
reddog6376 wrote:
They should be chased and caught. If an innocent person is killed in the process they should be tried for murder and recieve the death penalty. You seriously expect the police to ignore a stolen vehicle? What’s next, not shooting back at bank robbers because someone else may get hit? How about we just ignore all crime so we don’t step on someones toes?

You can gladly have your son die so i can get my car back. As a restitution for your loss the perpetrator will be prosecuted to the max. The insurance company will send you a plague thanking you, as they were saved from having to payout on a total loss. Saving much $$$$. The Officer gets a Bonus and a promotion. See? And your toes were not stepped on. Everyone is happy, even you. Right?

Hope my Sarcasm illustrated how you and others are wrong in your thinking. We just have to be more selective in who and how we chase. [/quote]

So what, we ask them for ID before we decide to chase them? Maybe ask them for fingerprints and run a background check? Then decide to chase them? Guess what genius, we can’t because they ran! Or maybe we should just allow criminals do do whatever they want because (gasp) someone might get hurt.

You can’t not enforce the law because you risk hurting others. You have to enforce it no matter what. When you catch them, you drop the hammer on them.

No I don’t think they should chase suspects. All police officers should have rocket launchers and just blow the vehicle up when it flees.

[quote]Therizza wrote:
No I don’t think they should chase suspects. All police officers should have rocket launchers and just blow the vehicle up when it flees.

[/quote]

x2

There was a police chase here in LA back in May, where the guy drove around crazy and then finally stopped. Now, mind you, the area it happened is El Monte, which is basically a 3rd world shit hole of a city.

The driver of the vehicle was a real winner, just out of state prison on parole, and ran out of the car trying to flee. He finally gave up and laid down on the ground face down. One of the cops comes up running and kicks him in the head, for which many people of Los Angeles applauded. Now, he is suing the LAPD for 5 million, saying he has headaches and sees stars ever since the kick. Personally, I think they should have beaten the dog shit out of him. What if he hit some innocent person? Some kid in the street playing or some little old lady? Mother fuckers like this lost their right to live. Please note, this is not the full video, the car chase is quite long.

Here is the video, it happens around 1:27 …

[quote]Gregus wrote:
Because i don’t want anyone dieing because of Money. Like running because you’re stupid and don’t want to get in trouble and arrested for warrants for unpaid tickets or something. It’s just not worth it to die over things like that. Even for the Cops not to mention civilians and our kids.
[/quote]

If I’m a gang leader, and this was the policy for the police, I’d invest in RV’s (even just vans, really) and keep them well stocked with food and water.

[quote]Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.[/quote]

Well, I’ll put aside your short-sighted, anti-police bias and address the crux of what you are saying as I generally agree with you. As an aside though, I doubt you have much experience in high-stress, tactical or any law enforcement situations in general as you simply chalk up tunnel vision and the willingness to do one’s job to being an “egotistical idiot”.

I can speak from 1st hand experience about police chases, so maybe some of you may find this useful.

New Jersey has a fairly strict pursuit policy although it is not always adhered to. Police are generally not allowed to pursue for most motor vehicle infractions and even most minor criminal offenses. We are also strongly cautioned to weigh road conditions and the possibility of later capturing a suspect before initiating a pursuit. A supervisor can terminate a pursuit at any time and my experience is that they often do so very quickly. Also, it is against state guidelines to critique or discipline an officer for refusing to begin a pursuit. I think we do a lot of things wrong in New Jersey, but our pursuit policy should probably be a model for the nation.

Don’t take any of the above to mean police can’t pursue for more serious crimes here. We do and I have personally been involved in chases(never came close to enjoying one either and I know no one who has…they are very harrowing). Criminals should never have the enticement to run that a strict no-pursuit policy would bring. However, our guidelines are set up to discourage pursuits except in serious circumstances.

Speaking from experience, I believe this is the most prudent way to handle business. There are too many factors at work that make chases tremendously dangerous. They include the ever growing amounts of population and traffic density, little to no real training in pursuit driving and stress management and maybe most importantly, the fact that we don’t have a reliable method to bring fleeing motor vehicles to a halt safely(at least not yet). In fact, I don’t know if it is even possible to train most cops up to the level where high speed pursuit and evasion driving is not a severe hazard. It would probably take hundreds of hours when all things are considered and cost a hell of a lot of money.

Bottom line, sometimes they are necessary but there are probably way too many pursuits taking place across the country and most states would be wise to at least consider adopting the more cautious guidelines that New Jersey has in place.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
There was a police chase here in LA back in May, where the guy drove around crazy and then finally stopped. Now, mind you, the area it happened is El Monte, which is basically a 3rd world shit hole of a city.

The driver of the vehicle was a real winner, just out of state prison on parole, and ran out of the car trying to flee. He finally gave up and laid down on the ground face down. One of the cops comes up running and kicks him in the head, for which many people of Los Angeles applauded. Now, he is suing the LAPD for 5 million, saying he has headaches and sees stars ever since the kick. Personally, I think they should have beaten the dog shit out of him. What if he hit some innocent person? Some kid in the street playing or some little old lady? Mother fuckers like this lost their right to live. Please note, this is not the full video, the car chase is quite long.

Here is the video, it happens around 1:27 …

The Police officer should not have kicked him in the head. Arrest him, cuff him and take him in. There is no room for personal vengeance or physical violence on the part of the officer. They have to held to a higher standard. Violence coming from the Police is no no, no matter the issue.

Once he is caught and secured that gig is up. No need for such actions.

[quote]clip11 wrote:
A couple days ago, there was a police chase in Detroit where innocent bystanders were killed. Do you think police should chase suspects, especially on busy streets?

I dont for the simple fact that people who dont have anything to do with it get hurt or die. I think a police officer involved in chasing a suspect should at the very least be fired. Sure the suspect may get away, but its not worth the life of someone else in order to catch said suspect.[/quote]

At times yes, at times no. Depending on the situation. Adn yes, I think you’re a little retarded.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.

Well, I’ll put aside your short-sighted, anti-police bias and address the crux of what you are saying as I generally agree with you. As an aside though, I doubt you have much experience in high-stress, tactical or any law enforcement situations in general as you simply chalk up tunnel vision and the willingness to do one’s job to being an “egotistical idiot”.

I can speak from 1st hand experience about police chases, so maybe some of you may find this useful.

New Jersey has a fairly strict pursuit policy although it is not always adhered to. Police are generally not allowed to pursue for most motor vehicle infractions and even most minor criminal offenses. We are also strongly cautioned to weigh road conditions and the possibility of later capturing a suspect before initiating a pursuit. A supervisor can terminate a pursuit at any time and my experience is that they often do so very quickly. Also, it is against state guidelines to critique or discipline an officer for refusing to begin a pursuit. I think we do a lot of things wrong in New Jersey, but our pursuit policy should probably be a model for the nation.

Don’t take any of the above to mean police can’t pursue for more serious crimes here. We do and I have personally been involved in chases(never came close to enjoying one either and I know no one who has…they are very harrowing). Criminals should never have the enticement to run that a strict no-pursuit policy would bring. However, our guidelines are set up to discourage pursuits except in serious circumstances.

Speaking from experience, I believe this is the most prudent way to handle business. There are too many factors at work that make chases tremendously dangerous. They include the ever growing amounts of population and traffic density, little to no real training in pursuit driving and stress management and maybe most importantly, the fact that we don’t have a reliable method to bring fleeing motor vehicles to a halt safely(at least not yet). In fact, I don’t know if it is even possible to train most cops up to the level where high speed pursuit and evasion driving is not a severe hazard. It would probably take hundreds of hours when all things are considered and cost a hell of a lot of money.

Bottom line, sometimes they are necessary but there are probably way too many pursuits taking place across the country and most states would be wise to at least consider adopting the more cautious guidelines that New Jersey has in place.
[/quote]

When you;re dealing with Criminals, policies are meaningless to them. Policies or no policies, they type of individual that will run, WILL RUN. Im a Police family member. I know the story, especially in NJ.

I know how cops pursue someone and call it in like they are supposed to. I know how they will lie about their speed to keep the supervisor from calling it off. Personal EGO’s take over all the time with cops. I would say 75% of cops have no business being cops. They are degenerate losers with the highest divorce and suicide rates for a reason. Very introverted, egotistical and difficult insecure people.

But a few maybe like yourself are the good apples.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.

Well, I’ll put aside your short-sighted, anti-police bias and address the crux of what you are saying as I generally agree with you. As an aside though, I doubt you have much experience in high-stress, tactical or any law enforcement situations in general as you simply chalk up tunnel vision and the willingness to do one’s job to being an “egotistical idiot”.

I can speak from 1st hand experience about police chases, so maybe some of you may find this useful.

New Jersey has a fairly strict pursuit policy although it is not always adhered to. Police are generally not allowed to pursue for most motor vehicle infractions and even most minor criminal offenses. We are also strongly cautioned to weigh road conditions and the possibility of later capturing a suspect before initiating a pursuit. A supervisor can terminate a pursuit at any time and my experience is that they often do so very quickly. Also, it is against state guidelines to critique or discipline an officer for refusing to begin a pursuit. I think we do a lot of things wrong in New Jersey, but our pursuit policy should probably be a model for the nation.

Don’t take any of the above to mean police can’t pursue for more serious crimes here. We do and I have personally been involved in chases(never came close to enjoying one either and I know no one who has…they are very harrowing). Criminals should never have the enticement to run that a strict no-pursuit policy would bring. However, our guidelines are set up to discourage pursuits except in serious circumstances.

Speaking from experience, I believe this is the most prudent way to handle business. There are too many factors at work that make chases tremendously dangerous. They include the ever growing amounts of population and traffic density, little to no real training in pursuit driving and stress management and maybe most importantly, the fact that we don’t have a reliable method to bring fleeing motor vehicles to a halt safely(at least not yet). In fact, I don’t know if it is even possible to train most cops up to the level where high speed pursuit and evasion driving is not a severe hazard. It would probably take hundreds of hours when all things are considered and cost a hell of a lot of money.

Bottom line, sometimes they are necessary but there are probably way too many pursuits taking place across the country and most states would be wise to at least consider adopting the more cautious guidelines that New Jersey has in place.
[/quote]

That makes excellent sense.Good post.

[quote]Gregus wrote:
JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.

Well, I’ll put aside your short-sighted, anti-police bias and address the crux of what you are saying as I generally agree with you. As an aside though, I doubt you have much experience in high-stress, tactical or any law enforcement situations in general as you simply chalk up tunnel vision and the willingness to do one’s job to being an “egotistical idiot”.

I can speak from 1st hand experience about police chases, so maybe some of you may find this useful.

New Jersey has a fairly strict pursuit policy although it is not always adhered to. Police are generally not allowed to pursue for most motor vehicle infractions and even most minor criminal offenses. We are also strongly cautioned to weigh road conditions and the possibility of later capturing a suspect before initiating a pursuit. A supervisor can terminate a pursuit at any time and my experience is that they often do so very quickly. Also, it is against state guidelines to critique or discipline an officer for refusing to begin a pursuit. I think we do a lot of things wrong in New Jersey, but our pursuit policy should probably be a model for the nation.

Don’t take any of the above to mean police can’t pursue for more serious crimes here. We do and I have personally been involved in chases(never came close to enjoying one either and I know no one who has…they are very harrowing). Criminals should never have the enticement to run that a strict no-pursuit policy would bring. However, our guidelines are set up to discourage pursuits except in serious circumstances.

Speaking from experience, I believe this is the most prudent way to handle business. There are too many factors at work that make chases tremendously dangerous. They include the ever growing amounts of population and traffic density, little to no real training in pursuit driving and stress management and maybe most importantly, the fact that we don’t have a reliable method to bring fleeing motor vehicles to a halt safely(at least not yet). In fact, I don’t know if it is even possible to train most cops up to the level where high speed pursuit and evasion driving is not a severe hazard. It would probably take hundreds of hours when all things are considered and cost a hell of a lot of money.

Bottom line, sometimes they are necessary but there are probably way too many pursuits taking place across the country and most states would be wise to at least consider adopting the more cautious guidelines that New Jersey has in place.

When you;re dealing with Criminals, policies are meaningless to them. Policies or no policies, they type of individual that will run, WILL RUN. Im a Police family member. I know the story, especially in NJ.

I know how cops pursue someone and call it in like they are supposed to. I know how they will lie about their speed to keep the supervisor from calling it off. Personal EGO’s take over all the time with cops. I would say 75% of cops have no business being cops. They are degenerate losers with the highest divorce and suicide rates for a reason. Very introverted, egotistical and difficult insecure people.

But a few maybe like yourself are the good apples. [/quote]

Being a family member of a cop means very little. I have a family member that is a very accomplished doctor but I have no real understanding of 99% of his profession involves.

As for the rest of your post, I’m sorry you feel that way. Perhaps you should reconsider such broad stereotyping.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:
I think Police chases should be Illegal in 99% of cases. They are chasing idiots and are usually being chased by idiot EGOTISTICAL cops who have just as much of a narrow tunnel vision as the perpetrator. The result? Civilian deaths.

Of course never mind the fact that actual Police work could have the person caught a few hours later through investigation. Police chases KILL alot of civilians for BULLSHIT. In California a whole culture has evolved around chases. It’s stupid.

Alot of you will change your tune if God forbid someone you know gets run over by a cop chasing a criminal, and the criminal was a guy who ren because of driving while suspended or some BS. Yeah, worth a life over keeping up the infallible Police image. Get a life.

Bottom line, Chases should be Illegal. Some forward “thinking” Departments have policies against chasing.

Well, I’ll put aside your short-sighted, anti-police bias and address the crux of what you are saying as I generally agree with you. As an aside though, I doubt you have much experience in high-stress, tactical or any law enforcement situations in general as you simply chalk up tunnel vision and the willingness to do one’s job to being an “egotistical idiot”.

I can speak from 1st hand experience about police chases, so maybe some of you may find this useful.

New Jersey has a fairly strict pursuit policy although it is not always adhered to. Police are generally not allowed to pursue for most motor vehicle infractions and even most minor criminal offenses. We are also strongly cautioned to weigh road conditions and the possibility of later capturing a suspect before initiating a pursuit. A supervisor can terminate a pursuit at any time and my experience is that they often do so very quickly. Also, it is against state guidelines to critique or discipline an officer for refusing to begin a pursuit. I think we do a lot of things wrong in New Jersey, but our pursuit policy should probably be a model for the nation.

Don’t take any of the above to mean police can’t pursue for more serious crimes here. We do and I have personally been involved in chases(never came close to enjoying one either and I know no one who has…they are very harrowing). Criminals should never have the enticement to run that a strict no-pursuit policy would bring. However, our guidelines are set up to discourage pursuits except in serious circumstances.

Speaking from experience, I believe this is the most prudent way to handle business. There are too many factors at work that make chases tremendously dangerous. They include the ever growing amounts of population and traffic density, little to no real training in pursuit driving and stress management and maybe most importantly, the fact that we don’t have a reliable method to bring fleeing motor vehicles to a halt safely(at least not yet). In fact, I don’t know if it is even possible to train most cops up to the level where high speed pursuit and evasion driving is not a severe hazard. It would probably take hundreds of hours when all things are considered and cost a hell of a lot of money.

Bottom line, sometimes they are necessary but there are probably way too many pursuits taking place across the country and most states would be wise to at least consider adopting the more cautious guidelines that New Jersey has in place.

When you;re dealing with Criminals, policies are meaningless to them. Policies or no policies, they type of individual that will run, WILL RUN. Im a Police family member. I know the story, especially in NJ.

I know how cops pursue someone and call it in like they are supposed to. I know how they will lie about their speed to keep the supervisor from calling it off. Personal EGO’s take over all the time with cops. I would say 75% of cops have no business being cops. They are degenerate losers with the highest divorce and suicide rates for a reason. Very introverted, egotistical and difficult insecure people.

But a few maybe like yourself are the good apples.

Being a family member of a cop means very little. I have a family member that is a very accomplished doctor but I have no real understanding of 99% of his profession involves.

As for the rest of your post, I’m sorry you feel that way. Perhaps you should reconsider such broad stereotyping. [/quote]

Dude i sit there like a therapist and listen to all the crap that goes down behind the blue wall. So i’d say im “probably” pretty well versed. Ofcourse there are differences in departments and such. The politics and paperwork alone are a quagmire.

I have to say though, your attitude about this is and has always been positive. I find no fault with your profession, or you, in fact i feel it’s under appreciated.

However, most cops are losers and this is coming from cops. So whenever i run into a professional officer that’s a good person and does not make a lifestyle of having a badge, i usually make good friends or acquaintances.

The nicest most professional cops i met, the ones with some self realization and sentience were educated officers with 4 years of college or more. Also there is changing of the guard in alot of places. A lot of the old times are getting replaced by a younger more positive and less embittered drinking old timers.

They need to beat the shit out of these people when they are back at the jail. Just throw him into a cell, and have guys taking turns on him. And when he cries about excessive force, cops just say that he was being resistive and combative, problem solved.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
They need to beat the shit out of these people when they are back at the jail. Just throw him into a cell, and have guys taking turns on him. And when he cries about excessive force, cops just say that he was being resistive and combative, problem solved. [/quote]

Yes i agree. Then you should run into a bunch of homophobic cops who got you on a bad day. They should then obviously arrest you for being bitchy (combative) and proceed to lock you up, rough you up and use toilet plungers to anally rape you :slight_smile:

Problem Solved. You reap what you sow. Your own preferential and enlightened policies coming back to haunt you? A good pillar of the community? Family man? tough. Problem Solved.

You are going to compare being bitchy with driving recklessly through neighborhoods risking the lives of innocent people and maybe killing them? Nice. Fuck that, do you think society is going to miss people like this?

Listen, don’t act like a bitch ok.

If you are ok with risking harm or death on innocent people by driving like a maniac through residential neighborhoods, on freeways, and on sidewalks, then you should be ok with having harm or death put on you. Like you said, you reap what you sow. If you think it’s ok to kill people who did nothing, then you should be ok with someone killing you for doing plenty. I swear, it’s like people have no idea of responsibility.

Good people stop when the police try to pull them over. Family men obey the laws. Good pillars of the community would not risk the lives of others at the benefit of themselves. What if some kid gets killed (which has happened many times)?

It is people like you, who prefer the rights of criminals than the rights of the innocent. Fuck 'em, let them die, they lost the right to live when they act like this. Shoot em right there in the street when they are arrested.

[quote]Gregus wrote:

Dude i sit there like a therapist and listen to all the crap that goes down behind the blue wall. So i’d say im “probably” pretty well versed. Ofcourse there are differences in departments and such. The politics and paperwork alone are a quagmire.

I have to say though, your attitude about this is and has always been positive. I find no fault with your profession, or you, in fact i feel it’s under appreciated.

However, most cops are losers and this is coming from cops. So whenever i run into a professional officer that’s a good person and does not make a lifestyle of having a badge, i usually make good friends or acquaintances.

The nicest most professional cops i met, the ones with some self realization and sentience were educated officers with 4 years of college or more. Also there is changing of the guard in alot of places. A lot of the old times are getting replaced by a younger more positive and less embittered drinking old timers. [/quote]

Listening to the narrow perspective of a few relatives who do the job is vastly different then going out and doing the job yourself.

I actually agree with your figure of 75% who shouldn’t be cops but I disagree with your reasons why. Most of that number are not embittered, egotistical losers(although a few are). They are simply not people hard-wired and disciplined enough to be good cops. Despite the constant pounding we receive in the news and entertainment media, doing the job right is tremendously difficult and requires a unique mindset and a very high level of training and discipline. Sadly, most officers are woefully short in those areas but it usually has nothing to do with the very negative traits you mention.

Being a ringmaster at the human circus is simply a very hard, sometimes almost impossible, job.

Funny how my 1% question was never answered…

[quote]JD430 wrote:
Gregus wrote:

Dude i sit there like a therapist and listen to all the crap that goes down behind the blue wall. So i’d say im “probably” pretty well versed. Ofcourse there are differences in departments and such. The politics and paperwork alone are a quagmire.

I have to say though, your attitude about this is and has always been positive. I find no fault with your profession, or you, in fact i feel it’s under appreciated.

However, most cops are losers and this is coming from cops. So whenever i run into a professional officer that’s a good person and does not make a lifestyle of having a badge, i usually make good friends or acquaintances.

The nicest most professional cops i met, the ones with some self realization and sentience were educated officers with 4 years of college or more. Also there is changing of the guard in alot of places. A lot of the old times are getting replaced by a younger more positive and less embittered drinking old timers.

Listening to the narrow perspective of a few relatives who do the job is vastly different then going out and doing the job yourself.

I actually agree with your figure of 75% who shouldn’t be cops but I disagree with your reasons why. Most of that number are not embittered, egotistical losers(although a few are). They are simply not people hard-wired and disciplined enough to be good cops. Despite the constant pounding we receive in the news and entertainment media, doing the job right is tremendously difficult and requires a unique mindset and a very high level of training and discipline. Sadly, most officers are woefully short in those areas but it usually has nothing to do with the very negative traits you mention.

Being a ringmaster at the human circus is simply a very hard, sometimes almost impossible, job.
[/quote]

You said everything i wanted to say and conveyed it they way i wanted to convey it. I agree.