Shooting In South Carolina

I was going to stay off of this thread, but I could not help but see it diminish into a debate over a stupid flag just like the national conversation. How do we (as a nation and on this thread) go from talking about nine people killed while at a bible study, to arguing about a dumb flag?

The victims families have been amazing Christians. They publicly forgave the shooter, and promised to not be burdened with hatred, something I would probably fail to do if I were in their shoes. It would be nice to see the national media focus on victims faith and the strength it brings them. Instead of going that route and uniting people, we have been sidetracked into another divisive distraction.

[quote]Alrightmiami19c wrote:
I was going to stay off of this thread, but I could not help but see it diminish into a debate over a stupid flag just like the national conversation. How do we (as a nation and on this thread) go from talking about nine people killed while at a bible study, to arguing about a dumb flag?

The victims families have been amazing Christians. They publicly forgave the shooter, and promised to not be burdened with hatred, something I would probably fail to do if I were in their shoes. It would be nice to see the national media focus on victims faith and the strength it brings them. Instead of going that route and uniting people, we have been sidetracked into another divisive distraction.
[/quote]

The only time the media and the left (but I repeat myself) celebrate religion is when it’s “you can’t judge all Muslims by the actions of the few extremists” and when the new Pope says dumbfuckery anti-gun, anti-capitalism bullshit.

The media and the left (but I repeat myself) have a playbook, and it it’s only rule is the ends justify the means. Their ends are simply “get this inline with MY opinion, all others be damned”. Trust me, had the families denounced God or joined Mom’s Demand More Zanex they would be the sole focus of the “national conversation”.

It’s because they did the “Christian” thing to do, and are amazingly strong is why we’re talking about flags.

[quote]Alrightmiami19c wrote:
I was going to stay off of this thread, but I could not help but see it diminish into a debate over a stupid flag just like the national conversation. How do we (as a nation and on this thread) go from talking about nine people killed while at a bible study, to arguing about a dumb flag?[/quote]

Pretty simple: there isn’t much to say about the shooter and his victims. The former is evil, the latter are tragic. The survivors and family members, too, are tragic (and also remarkably strong). Nobody is going to argue with any of this, and, if someone were to try, that person wouldn’t be worth arguing with.

So the debate turns to things that are related and also controversial. Guess who put that flag into this story? Dylann Roof. You’ve seen the pictures, and, if you understand history, you know that Roof had a more accurate historical understanding of the Confederate battle flag and the ideology it represents than many people in this thread. For example, from his very mouth:

[quote]
I have read hundreds of slaves narratives from my state. And almost all of them were positive. One sticks out in my mind where an old ex-slave recounted how the day his mistress died was one of the saddest days of his life. And in many of these narratives the slaves told of how their masters didnt even allowing whipping on his plantation.

Segregation was not a bad thing. It was a defensive measure. Segregation did not exist to hold back negroes. It existed to protect us from them. And I mean that in multiple ways.[/quote]

Every single word of the foregoing excerpt is lifted directly from ideologies that are attested a thousandfold in the literature of the Confederacy, for which, again, the colors in question were born.

Why does any of this matter? It’s too obvious for me to spell it out, so instead I’ll offer a hypothetical that corresponds well in every important way: Suppose the state of New York were flying, on public property and before its State House, a flag with the Black Panther logo (the BP’s have a long history in the state of NY, after all). Suppose further that a guy who reveres that very logo – and, more importantly, reveres what it stands for – were to visit a New York church, killing nine white people for the explicit reason of their whiteness. What reaction might we expect from PWI? I’ll tell you: You wouldn’t even need the killing. The flight of the flag alone would be enough to send this board into whirling, pants-shitting paroxysms of tears and self-sorrow. Screeching whines about the persecution of the white man would echo unto the ends of the Earth.

About New York, I never thought I’d utter these words, but good for them. Turns out the “Safe Act” registrations was damn near abysmal and the populous said a collective “fuck you” to .gov.

Hat’s off NY’ers. Hat’s off, you big soda loving freaks.

Regardless of the history behind the Confederate flag, we need to be honest about what it represents: separatism, segregation, and yes, racism. When I see the flag, what comes to mind? Redneck racist. That’s the truth whether you want to admit it or not.

Despite the “heritage” of the flag, it’s been hijacked by rednecks and used as a racist symbol. That’s what most people identify with it, despite its orgins.

What about the Nazi flag? What comes to mind? Do you know the sign was stolen from the Hindus/Buddhists? It had a much different meaning, but they used the symbol and just reserved it. It’s not their symbol, they hijacked it and now we associate it with Nazis.

How is this different?

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dukes-of-hazzard-toy-car-general-lee-loses-its-confederate-flag-2015-06-24[/quote]

I noticed the car was in a commercial that began airing recently (before all this). They used various angles to downplay it, but even from the low angles you could see that the flag was gone.


R.I.P.

[quote]NorCal916 wrote:

What about the Nazi flag? … How is this different?[/quote]

Well, for one, the Nazi flags, arm bands, uniforms, and the like are all readily available on ebay and Amazon.

[quote]NorCal916 wrote:
Regardless of the history behind the Confederate flag, we need to be honest about what it represents: separatism, segregation, and yes, racism. When I see the flag, what comes to mind? Redneck racist. That’s the truth whether you want to admit it or not.

Despite the “heritage” of the flag, it’s been hijacked by rednecks and used as a racist symbol. That’s what most people identify with it, despite its orgins.

What about the Nazi flag? What comes to mind? Do you know the sign was stolen from the Hindus/Buddhists? It had a much different meaning, but they used the symbol and just reserved it. It’s not their symbol, they hijacked it and now we associate it with Nazis.

How is this different?[/quote]

I think making a flag the center of attention in this case takes away from the victims and their families and the justice the shooter deserves.
A flag didn’t pull the trigger, a hateful racist did.
You can burn every Confederate flag in existence and it’s not going to help a single damn person. It’s not going to bring people together, it’s not going to root out hate, it’s going to do nothing. It’s a hollow victory.
People are pouring their vitriol into a symbol, in hopes that destroying the symbol will destroy what they hate.
Making this tragedy about a flag will only end up in more tragedy. We going to attack people bearing a confederate flag, because we automatically think they are racists?

I have lived in the south most of my life. The stars and bars have always been around, and it’s flown in all kinds of racial diversity with no one giving it a second thought until recently. In the '70’s, '80’s and '90’s it was just another flag and nobody paid much attention to it. Why all the sudden, it’s a big deal is beyond me.

I know this, 9 people are dead in a horrific terrorist attack. I say terrorist because though this guy isn’t part of ISIS or some islamic nut-job organization, his goal was to terrorize blacks. He’ll only succeed if we let him. And if we make it about a symbol rather than human relationships, he will have succeeded to some degree. If we pull together, help who we can help, and pay color no mind, he loses. I say lets make him lose.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
And here we go again with the “hate crime” thing again. Who cares if the murderer hated the victims more than other murderers hate their victims? Cold-blooded murder is still murder and the murderer needs to pay the ultimate price regardless of his degree of hate.

*edited[/quote]

It’s actually a legal strategy that allows him to be tried in federal court under federal law rather than state. I actually do not disagree with the move. Though I tend to agree with your overall sentiment that all crimes committed against others are all technically hate crimes.
This particular crime was a text book definition of a ‘hate crime’. I agree with the maneuver because it allows the full weight of the fed to be heaped upon his narrow shoulders. The scope of punishment is much larger under the fed. That’s why I agree with it in this case.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
About New York, I never thought I’d utter these words, but good for them. Turns out the “Safe Act” registrations was damn near abysmal and the populous said a collective “fuck you” to .gov.

Hat’s off NY’ers. Hat’s off, you big soda loving freaks. [/quote]

I don’t know anyone that complied with the “Safe act.” Plenty of “fuck Cuomo” stickers around, just not enough votes to send him packing last November.

A few facts to get started because some of you seem misguided:
(1) The flag in question is the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia.
(2) The Army of Northern Virginia battle flag was never the national flag of the CSA.
(3) The ships that brought slaves to the US never flew the ANV battle flag or any other CSA flag. They flew the US flag, the Portuguese flag, the British flag, but never any CSA flag.
(4) If you believe that the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia symbolizes slavery and racism, please realize that slavery in the CSA under whatever flag you want to use only lasted for 4 or so years. It lasted decades under Old Glory prior to, and even several years after, the emancipation of Southern slaves. I believe Deleware may have been the last State to emancipate slaves some time around 1870 I think. As far as I know, racism has existed and always will exist under every flag.
(5) What the war was fought over depends on who you ask and what year of the war you are talking about.

All that said… I am a lifelong resident of Alabama and I couldn’t care less whether the battle flag flys or not. Whether or not that flag flys, I still have to go to work tomorrow. They took all of them down in Montgomery earlier today. It doesn’t effect my life in the least. I am more concerned with taking care of my family and living life. If I want to see the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, I can fly my own at home. I just can’t buy one at Walmart, which I also don’t give a shit about.

You’re offended by the flag: So what? How long were you a slave? How did slavery directly impact your life personally? Fucking grow up. Make something of yourself and move on. Racists use it as a symbol? So what? Let racists wallow in their shit existence and go do something with yourself. Be better than them. Stop wasting time bitching and complaining. Success is the ultimate bird finger.

You’re offended because they took the flag down: It’s a symbol of my heritage? Bull shit. I have several ancestors who fought for the Army of Northern Virginia. Two who died in battle. One supposedly died in Pickets charge. I never met any of them. I don’t have pictures of them hanging in my house. Heritage? The only thing that I can see that they did for me was make my life harder. I get to deal with the lingering effects of the total devastation of the South on a daily basis. Yes, it still lingers.

I don’t know what my point is. I am just tired of both sides of this shit.

And also this

[quote]Alrightmiami19c wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
About New York, I never thought I’d utter these words, but good for them. Turns out the “Safe Act” registrations was damn near abysmal and the populous said a collective “fuck you” to .gov.

Hat’s off NY’ers. Hat’s off, you big soda loving freaks. [/quote]

I don’t know anyone that complied with the “Safe act.” Plenty of “fuck Cuomo” stickers around, just not enough votes to send him packing last November.[/quote]

Didn’t know you were in NY. Sorry to hear man. VT is close, and about a gun friendly as you can get short of cans.

But yeah, the City really bones the rest of the state when it comes to, well, everything.

[quote]OldOgre wrote:
(1) The flag in question is the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia.[/quote]

The phrases “battle flag” and “ANV” have been in this thread for pages and pages.

[quote]
(2) The Army of Northern Virginia battle flag was never the national flag of the CSA.[/quote]

It was created for the CSA, for its defense, and has since come to symbolize the CSA.

[quote]

(4) If you believe that the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia symbolizes slavery and racism, please realize that slavery in the CSA under whatever flag you want to use only lasted for 4 or so years.[/quote]

It symbolizes racism because, as has been repeated in here a nauseating number of times, it was created for a country that was created – explicitly – for the purpose of nurturing and proliferating the legal chattelhood of black slaves.

[quote]

(5) What the war was fought over depends on who you ask and what year of the war you are talking about.[/quote]

Whether 9/11 was an inside job depends on whom you ask. Whether aliens visited New Mexico depends on whom you ask. Whether Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing depends on whom you ask. The states the would become the CSA seceded for the explicit cause of the protection of the institution of slavery. There no mystery and there is no historiographical conspiracy.

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Whether Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing depends on whom you ask. [/quote]

People think this?

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

Didn’t know you were in NY. Sorry to hear man. VT is close, and about a gun friendly as you can get short of cans.

But yeah, the City really bones the rest of the state when it comes to, well, everything. [/quote]

I’m near Albany. The most common phrase up here is “I would love to move out of New York but…” I feel like the only reason anyone lives here is family and friends.
There have actually been a few petitions to secede from downstate. It hasn’t gained much traction, but would split the state in two. Rockland and Westchester counties south and all of long island being New York, and the rest of the state being New Amsterdam.

Catching up.

No, the Civil War wasn’t fought over “economics”, except in the sense that the Slave Power was seceding and forcing a fight over their preferred way of creating personal wealth. It wasn’t over “states’ rights” or tariffs - it was over the preservation of the Union and the rules of the republican experiment, and the institution of slavery.

No, just because someone would like to trot out a new or revisionist theory as to what the Civil War was “really about” doesn’t mean that theory is entitled to instant credibility or authority.

As for the flag, someone mentioned it earlier - the bigger issue is that it demonstrates loyalty to a nation other than the United States. (Photos of Dylann Roof stomping and spitting on the American flag tells you all you need to know about that.) But I certainly get the claim that it is a racist symbol, and why people think it should come down.

As is, states are deciding it should come down, so what is there to complain about if states are choosing to do so?