[quote]BobParr wrote:
[quote]TigerBeans wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]Charlie Horse wrote:
[quote]Sterneneisen wrote:
Fucking masquerade.
Just when more and more studies keep saying that sat fat and cholesterol have nothing to do with heart disease.[/quote]
Yeah, I have been reading this too.
Having your health care include a gym membership would be more helpful.
If they’re going to tax a food item maybe sugar would be a better one? [/quote]
I believe they already have a tax like that.
[/quote]
Never heard of a sugar-tax around here, but that doesn�?�´t mean it�?�´s not there, I guess.
From what I can gather, the only ones who think this tax is a good idea are the politicians who voted it in.
Danish politicians are dumbfucks though, the lot of them, so eh…
[/quote]
Glad to hear that problem is limited to Denmark. On this side of the ocean we’re blessed with non-dumbfuck politicians. 
LOL about a “short-lived tax.” Once voted in, a tax might on very rare occasions be adjusted downward slightly, but it never really goes away. It’s one area where you can count on dumbfuck politicians to never waver.
[/quote]
I will admit that I hate politics with a passion, so I could just be biased like that 
Googling “fedtskat” (fat tax) brings up a long list of either “fat tax sucks” or
“why the fat tax will fail”, so you are not alone with your opinions, the danish people are behind you as well 