[quote]Sloth wrote:
Who cares. The alternative to a Palin vice-presidency is an Obama Presidency. At this point, as long as she can spell her own name, I’m voting McCain.[/quote]
On what issues do you disagree with Obama? and why?
[quote]hokiehess wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Who cares. The alternative to a Palin vice-presidency is an Obama Presidency. At this point, as long as she can spell her own name, I’m voting McCain.
On what issues do you disagree with Obama? and why?[/quote]
Healthcare, taxes, abortion, and social programs.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
katzenjammer wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
And so what the fuck do you propose nutjob?
That’s quite a non sequitur there Irish.
I just want to know what fucknut thinks we should be doing instead of debating about probably the most important election in years.
For every smart post Lixy makes, he makes fifteen that make you reach for a bottle of scotch and handgun. I want to see what he thinks.[/quote]
You think the ratio of good posts is that high for lixy, huh?
Just the other day, he posted an article about the mythical islamic roots of the British legal system. Not only were the roots not to be found, but the article cited rulings from the 4 Schools of Sunni Islam - the very same juridical bodies lixy tells us don’t matter.
If he told me the sky is blue, I wouldn’t believe it until I went outside and verified with my own eyes.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
hokiehess wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Who cares. The alternative to a Palin vice-presidency is an Obama Presidency. At this point, as long as she can spell her own name, I’m voting McCain.
On what issues do you disagree with Obama? and why?
Healthcare, taxes, abortion, and social programs.[/quote]
I agree with you on all of the above, but bear in mind McCain does not care about any of these issues. Domestic policy is simply not a priority in any way for him, unless it’s useless nanny-state grandstanding on steroids in baseball, ultimate fighting, or other meaningless “issues.”
McCain wants to rattle sabers and start foreign wars. He could care less about genuinely American concerns.
Vote Constitution Party or Libertarian. You’ll feel better about yourself.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
.[/quote]
Is this all you libs are able to do, site her pork? Shall we look at Biden and Obama’s record? Of course, Obama hasn’t even been in the Senate long enough to accumulate much of that sort of thing.
Edit: retraction. It seems she provided enough during the interview.
Oh well, what’s not to love about a MILF who shoots? It’s as good a reason to vote for somebody as any nowadays.
[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
With all the extraordinarily talented people in this country, why do we end up with these four bozos? How does this happen? Anyone have any guesses about that? [/quote]
We’re getting the level of government we deserve. These are the people who we smelted from the dross in the primaries. Yay us.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
RJ, what economic experience of Palin’s are you refering to?[/quote]
Running a city, running a state, owning a business.
What economic experience has Obama ever had?
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
He does NOT have less foreign policy experience. I can’t have a conversation with you if you can’t at least admit that. I think you actually did in another thread.
Obama has met with numerous foreign leaders. Is on committees that focus on foreign policy. And has worked on bipartisian bills. Palin lives near Russia.
I won’t admit he has foreign policy experience. That would be a lie. What experience do you think he has? Chairing a subcommittee that has never met? What?
Is that any more than W had, “Mr. I-couldn’t-name-five -foreign-leaders-if-they-were-tattooed-on-my-cock”?
What about JFK? How much did he have?
Bill Clinton?
Mitt Romney?
Anyone else that’s ever been a governor?[/quote]
You fucks are the ones whining about how inexperienced Palin is. If experience doesn’t matter for the fucking Presidential nominee, why is it such a big fucking deal for the VP?
The argument you just gave could jst as easily be used for Palin.
When the fuck was Mitt Romney aver a president?
Dude - get off the whiskey. It’s not even dark yet.
[quote]GDollars37 wrote:
Sloth wrote:
hokiehess wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Who cares. The alternative to a Palin vice-presidency is an Obama Presidency. At this point, as long as she can spell her own name, I’m voting McCain.
On what issues do you disagree with Obama? and why?
Healthcare, taxes, abortion, and social programs.
I agree with you on all of the above, but bear in mind McCain does not care about any of these issues. Domestic policy is simply not a priority in any way for him, unless it’s useless nanny-state grandstanding on steroids in baseball, ultimate fighting, or other meaningless “issues.”
McCain wants to rattle sabers and start foreign wars. He could care less about genuinely American concerns.
Vote Constitution Party or Libertarian. You’ll feel better about yourself.[/quote]
Those parties aren’t even going to hit double digits, percentage wise. Perhaps next time around, but for now I’m going to do my part to defeat Obama.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
RJ, what economic experience of Palin’s are you refering to?
Running a city, running a state, owning a business.
What economic experience has Obama ever had? [/quote]
Not much. But judging by both of their comments and their interviews, he has a better grasp of what’s going on in this COUNTRY’S economy. And running a state and a company is very different than dealing with the economic issues that face a nation.
As Carly Fiorina has said. Why the comparison to Obama? I’m not happy with him either. My qualms and beefs with Obama have no impact on my view that Palin is a total joke.
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
You fucking tool.[/quote]
Lol you are so adorable when you get mad.
P.S. you are such a nice guy haha
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
entheogens wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
Not quite…More like: Obama gets intereviewed with softball questions - Obama does well - Media IS liberal.
Very nice at turning the original topic around. Were Katie Couric’s questions fair? Are they questions that should be asked of a Vice President?
Are liberals generally slow? Is it that they don’t like the truth shoved down their throat repeatedly? Or…is it something else?
WHEN WILL OBAMA EVER BE ASKED TOUGH QUESTIONS BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA?
Now…I know that answer to that question, do you? I bet you do you’re a bright guy.[/quote]
Please explain, what truth, liberals aren’t digesting?
If it is the questioning from mainstream media, did you watch the O’Reilly videos? He was leading the interviewee, and stating his opinions or actually telling Obama how he is going to handle foreign affairs in office.
It was ridiculously unfair and Obama kept his composure and gave eloquent well thought out answers.
Please, just tell me directly that I am wrong about this.
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
RJ, what economic experience of Palin’s are you refering to?
Running a city, running a state, owning a business.
What economic experience has Obama ever had?
Not much. But judging by both of their comments and their interviews, he has a better grasp of what’s going on in this COUNTRY’S economy. And running a state and a company is very different than dealing with the economic issues that face a nation.
[/quote]
Wow. I don’t think you are as middle of the road as you think you are.
No one with even the most basic of economic sense can say that Obama has a grasp on what is good for the country’s economy. At least not with t a straight face.
He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius. [/quote]
Even scarier is that Obama and Biden both make Couric look like a genius.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
rainjack wrote:
He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius.
Even scarier is that Obama and Biden both make Couric look like a genius.[/quote]
True that. What have we come to when television personalities seem more intelligent than the candidates?
[quote]rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
RJ, what economic experience of Palin’s are you refering to?
Running a city, running a state, owning a business.
What economic experience has Obama ever had?
Not much. But judging by both of their comments and their interviews, he has a better grasp of what’s going on in this COUNTRY’S economy. And running a state and a company is very different than dealing with the economic issues that face a nation.
Wow. I don’t think you are as middle of the road as you think you are.
No one with even the most basic of economic sense can say that Obama has a grasp on what is good for the country’s economy. At least not with t a straight face.
He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius. [/quote]
I didn’t say GOOD grasp. I said BETTER grasp. Palin makes Paris Hilton look like a genius. Have you actually listened to what she’s been saying?
On what are you basing your opinion that she has economic sense? That she was a small town mayor. And then governor for two years in which the state she was in charge of managed not to collapse?
I liked her. At least some things about her. Until she started to talk. And until her voting record was exposed. Anyhow, it’s Friday night. Time for the debates. Then time to go out. Obama’s a big disappointment. And McCain’s running mate is a joke. That’s the reality. Sad and true.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
RJ, what economic experience of Palin’s are you refering to?
Running a city, running a state, owning a business.
What economic experience has Obama ever had?
Not much. But judging by both of their comments and their interviews, he has a better grasp of what’s going on in this COUNTRY’S economy. And running a state and a company is very different than dealing with the economic issues that face a nation.
Wow. I don’t think you are as middle of the road as you think you are.
No one with even the most basic of economic sense can say that Obama has a grasp on what is good for the country’s economy. At least not with t a straight face.
He makes Jimmy Carter look like a genius. [/quote]
Yeah, like that moron Warren Buffet. Or that idiot majority at the Aemrican Economic Association who support Obama’s plan. ZOMG those elitist libral academic scum!!
And Im sure any idiot could graduate magna cum laude Harvard law and become a constitutional law professor at U of Chicago…
hey, what’s Palin’s educational background again? LMAO!
[quote]Floortom wrote:
<<< Yeah, like that moron Warren Buffet. Or that idiot majority at the Aemrican Economic Association who support Obama’s plan. ZOMG those elitist libral academic scum!!
And Im sure any idiot could graduate magna cum laude Harvard law and become a constitutional law professor at U of Chicago…
hey, what’s Palin’s educational background again? LMAO!
[/quote]
It’s funny.
Guys like you further convince me that Bonzo the performing chimp would be preferable in the whitehouse to Barack Obama.