The point people should be focusing on is whether or not the information that was shared has or will damage US intelligence capabilities because our allies don’t trust the CIC not to endanger their operatives. That is the real issue here.
2 Likes
I have no idea I am an entrepreneur. I spend my time developing small businesses. Check with some of the folks on T Nation that think they know everything about everything and never admit when they are wrong…which by the way is most of the time. At least with their political prognostications.
Just google “Trump defends sharing classified information about terrorism”.
We are all equally smart when it comes to things we know nothing about. All we have to do is google.
Well, I think it’s obvious at this point that Trump is working for the Russians. And he’s doing it because they are paying him hundreds of thousands of dollars…no perhaps millions. And he really needs the money. He gave up making millions (or more) to become President. But for some reason money is far more important to him than his legacy as President. It’s perfectly logical in the eyes of the haters. So it must be true. Dang our President is working for Russia…how’d that happen?
Ha ha ha…I’ve seen political games before but never one so absolutely ridiculous on its face. But when that’s all you got you run with it.
Well of course he gave up information that will damage US intelligence. Just turn on MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS or NBC and they will give you the spot on scoop …blow by blow…\
Oh and don’t forget the reliable story from the Washington Post who used unnamed sources. But we don’t need “named sources” this is Trump for heaven sakes. Anything will do as long as it looks bad.
Lovin it…
IMPEACH HIM DANG IT!!
I think a more logical view is that Trump is nearing the end of his lifespan and if he’s working with Russia, it’s because they offered him a legacy that will survive after he does not. Compared to being POTUS, his businesses are a joke on the premise of a lasting history.
This was disappointing lol.
Always trying to downplay Trump’s mistakes because of “DA MEDIA” or “DA FEELZ” removes any intent to evaluate him on a case by case basis. You are quite literally half of the problem in this country regarding politics (with what you’re complaining about being the other half funnily enough).
The same Washington Post that broke the Watergate scandal using anonymous sources?
Did you read Trump’s Twitter feed?
Yes, good theory. He will be able to go down in history as the worst traitor since Benedict Arnold. That is something that every President wants but none have been able to attain it as yet.
I agree, and you are the other half.
And I will offer the same bet to you as I did Tyler. If Trump is impeached or resigns I won’t post for one year. If he doesn’t then you don’t post for one year.
I have found that bets such as this really brings out the true belief that one has in the cheap words that are thrown together on the Internet. Tyler is a true believer, he’s wrong, but I admire him for standing behind his words.
Now what about you?
I don’t know why I was surprised to wake up to his tweet today. This is Trump’s other Achilles heel: telling him he cannot do something. His response, “Wanna bet??”
And for all of the criticism that the MSM is unfair to Trump, CNN has this on their front page:
Is it even remotely a question anymore? You can almost predict his behavior if you just ask yourself, “What is the absolute worst way the president could handle this particular situation?”
Ha ha…you are smarter than this my friend. The Watergate story was broken back in 1972ish. There was real reporting then. If you think for one second that the same quality exists now anywhere… you are mistaken.
I’m not really interested in getting into e-dick measuring contests anymore. I’ve learned my lesson between TheRaj, Zepplin, etc… So, I’m not going to spend the rest of the day going back and forth with you over this.
If it doesn’t trouble you that the President might have shared information that will damage our relationship with an ally and; therefore, damage our intelligence capabilities and thus our National Defense then there’s nothing more to discuss anyway.
If we substitute Trump for Obama, Clinton, Kasich, McCain, Palin, GWB, etc… I would be equally as concerned over this.
2 Likes
I would also assume that the goal was to not get caught if he is indeed working with Russia.
I’m not sure how I’m the other half, as I don’t believe Trump colluded with Russia directly. Personally I’m on the side that Russia has an overarching end game, and that Trump as POTUS accomplishes that goal better than HRC as POTUS.
As I don’t believe Trump directly colluded with Russia, I decline the bet. [quote=“anon50325502, post:668, topic:226860”]
Did you read Trump’s Twitter feed?
[/quote]
We’ve now entered the twilight zone, where even Trump’s twitter is FakeNews.
Funny…I used to say that about Obama.
As I have always said…you are a smart man!
Okay gang I actually have plenty of work to do today and can’t get sucked into the black hole of PWI threads.
Everyone have fun.
The part about leaving for several hours and then coming back is that the topic has not changed and the same people are saying the same stuff.
Talk about the twilight zone…
HA!
This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, to say the Russia/Trump stuff doesn’t worry the fuck out of me.
Russia clearly has a plan, I just wish more republicans wanted to find out what that was. Ultimately, I wish Trump wanted to find out what that was.
Comedy gold.[quote=“zeb1, post:657, topic:226860”]
Furthermore, I don’t think you are familiar enough with the past 44 Presidents to make such a determination.
[/quote]
Troll attempt has failed. Rest assured, if any of us want deep, informed perspective on presidential history, don’t call us, we’ll call you.
1 Like
Watch julian assange nod at 1:01 when asked if Seth Rich was his source
Start a new thread. Don’t fuck up this one too.
NO
This has to do with Russia and Trump theory
