No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
only thing I will comment on is this.
All of his videos look like he is fighting for breath, the guy looks bad he looks like hes about to die everytime he speaks.
not arguing anything hes saying just commenting on his physical appearence.
[quote]Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.[/quote]
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.
[quote]MaddyD wrote:
only thing I will comment on is this.
All of his videos look like he is fighting for breath, the guy looks bad he looks like hes about to die everytime he speaks.
not arguing anything hes saying just commenting on his physical appearence.[/quote]
withdrawal symptoms
[quote]Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.[/quote]
Rush Limbaugh uses the term “feminazis” to denote a specific subset of feminists. He does not consider all feminists to be “feminazis”.
[quote]NealRaymond2 wrote:
Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.
Rush Limbaugh uses the term “feminazis” to denote a specific subset of feminists. He does not consider all feminists to be “feminazis”.[/quote]
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
[quote]PB-Crawl wrote:
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
[/quote]
A celebrity.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
PB-Crawl wrote:
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
A celebrity.[/quote]
All depends if you admit yourself anyone can take advantage of this loophole, you just have to do it before criminal chrages are presed.
The bonus is it leaves a way for you to file suite against your employer if they fire your, I mean after all it is a disease and that is discrimination. a company has no right to discriminate in who it employs, hell why do we even have interviews you should just say I want to do this and have that job.
Sorry off base, gotta love the direction we are going.
Anyone ever seen the movie idiocracy, welcome to America in the not so distant future.
[quote]Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.[/quote]
You are taking issue with things he did not say and you just suspect?
Did you believe Obama when he said Ayers was just some guy in his neighborhood?
[quote]PB-Crawl wrote:
NealRaymond2 wrote:
Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.
Rush Limbaugh uses the term “feminazis” to denote a specific subset of feminists. He does not consider all feminists to be “feminazis”.
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
[/quote]
I don’t believe any drug abusers or users should get any jail time what so ever… Do you think it’s the role of the government to control what you put into your own body?
[quote]pat wrote:
PB-Crawl wrote:
NealRaymond2 wrote:
Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.
Rush Limbaugh uses the term “feminazis” to denote a specific subset of feminists. He does not consider all feminists to be “feminazis”.
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
I don’t believe any drug abusers or users should get any jail time what so ever… Do you think it’s the role of the government to control what you put into your own body? [/quote]
if that drug abuse is provoking you to commit other crimes that endanger people, yes.(driving cars, child abandonment, selling to non-adults ect.)
that comment was mostly poking fun at rush’s views against rehab for drug offenders and his subsequent trip to rehab.
[quote]PB-Crawl wrote:
pat wrote:
PB-Crawl wrote:
NealRaymond2 wrote:
Gael wrote:
Cortes wrote:
No argument. I just enjoyed this very much and wanted to post it. Although I’m sure there are those here who will gleefully find something wrong with the message.
There is nothing wrong with the central message. I take issue with his attempt to frame the message of one that is encompassed by the conservatism that stands in chief opposition to liberalism. These are not “his” ideas, nor are they ideas that have grown out of conservatism.
I also suspect that Rush is lying when he says he holds no feelings for contempt against the feminists. I mean feminazis. Why didn’t he call them feminazis in this clip? Because it would have made him look like a liar.
Rush Limbaugh uses the term “feminazis” to denote a specific subset of feminists. He does not consider all feminists to be “feminazis”.
what term does he use for drug abusers and criminals who get off scotch free by entering rehab instead of doing the maximum prison time they deserve?
I don’t believe any drug abusers or users should get any jail time what so ever… Do you think it’s the role of the government to control what you put into your own body?
if that drug abuse is provoking you to commit other crimes that endanger people, yes.(driving cars, child abandonment, selling to non-adults ect.)
that comment was mostly poking fun at rush’s views against rehab for drug offenders and his subsequent trip to rehab.
[/quote]
Those things you mentioned are already illegal. The inspiration for committing crimes are as varied as the criminals who commit them. I am against government funded rehab assignments. If you dig yourself a hole with drugs, that’s your problem not mine.